Literature DB >> 22459105

Comparison of Tono-Pen and Goldmann applanation tonometers for measurement of intraocular pressure in healthy children.

Yasmin S Bradfield1, Brett M Kaminski, Michael X Repka, Michele Melia, Bradley V Davitt, David A Johnson, Raymond T Kraker, Ruth E Manny, Noelle S Matta, Susan Schloff, Katherine K Weise.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: To assess the agreement of intraocular pressure (IOP) measured with the Tono-Pen and the Goldmann applanation tonometer (GAT) in normal children and adolescents.
METHODS: A total of 439 subjects from birth to <18 years of age without anterior segment anomalies or glaucoma had their IOP measured with the two instruments by separate, masked examiners in the office or under general anesthesia.
RESULTS: On average, the Tono-Pen measured values slightly lower than the GAT for IOP <11 mm Hg and slightly higher than the GAT for IOP >11 mm Hg in the office setting. Using the average of GAT and Tono-Pen IOPs to estimate the true IOP, the average difference (GAT - Tono-Pen) was 0.4 mm Hg at IOP of 10 mm Hg and -3.0 mm Hg at IOP of 20 mm Hg. The 95% limits of agreement on the average difference between instruments were ± 6.4 mm Hg in the office setting and ± 6.8 mm Hg under general anesthesia. Larger differences between instruments were found with younger age. Standard error of measurement with the Tono-Pen was 1.44 mm Hg and 1.82 mm Hg for the office and anesthesia settings, respectively. Thicker corneas were associated with higher IOP with both the GAT and the Tono-Pen.
CONCLUSIONS: In normal children, average differences between IOP measured by Tono-Pen and GAT were small, although there was substantial test-retest variability. Younger age was associated with larger average differences, as was higher IOP in the office setting.
Copyright © 2012 American Association for Pediatric Ophthalmology and Strabismus. Published by Mosby, Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22459105      PMCID: PMC3428123          DOI: 10.1016/j.jaapos.2011.12.150

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J AAPOS        ISSN: 1091-8531            Impact factor:   1.220


  19 in total

1.  New Tonopen XL: comparison with the Goldmann tonometer.

Authors:  M Iester; A Mermoud; F Achache; S Roy
Journal:  Eye (Lond)       Date:  2001-02       Impact factor: 3.775

2.  Standardizing the measurement of intraocular pressure for clinical research. Guidelines from the Eye Care Technology Forum.

Authors:  M A Kass
Journal:  Ophthalmology       Date:  1996-01       Impact factor: 12.079

3.  Comparison of the Tono-Pen to the Goldmann applanation tonometer.

Authors:  R E Frenkel; Y J Hong; D H Shin
Journal:  Arch Ophthalmol       Date:  1988-06

4.  Clinical evaluation of the Oculab Tono-Pen.

Authors:  D S Minckler; G Baerveldt; D K Heuer; B Quillen-Thomas; A F Walonker; J Weiner
Journal:  Am J Ophthalmol       Date:  1987-08-15       Impact factor: 5.258

5.  Comparing methods of measurement: why plotting difference against standard method is misleading.

Authors:  J M Bland; D G Altman
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  1995-10-21       Impact factor: 79.321

6.  Reliability of intraocular pressure measurement with the Goldmann applanation tonometer in epidemiological studies.

Authors:  I Dielemans; J R Vingerling; A Hofman; D E Grobbee; P T de Jong
Journal:  Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol       Date:  1994-03       Impact factor: 3.117

7.  Sources of variability in the results of applanation tonometry.

Authors:  M A Motolko; F Feldman; M Hyde; D Hudy
Journal:  Can J Ophthalmol       Date:  1982-06       Impact factor: 1.882

8.  Central corneal thickness in children.

Authors:  Yasmin S Bradfield; B Michele Melia; Michael X Repka; Brett M Kaminski; Bradley V Davitt; David A Johnson; Raymond T Kraker; Ruth E Manny; Noelle S Matta; Katherine K Weise; Susan Schloff
Journal:  Arch Ophthalmol       Date:  2011-09

9.  Intraocular pressures in children with glaucoma during halothane anesthesia.

Authors:  B Ausinsch; E S Munson; N S Levy
Journal:  Ann Ophthalmol       Date:  1977-11

10.  Tonometry in pediatric patients: a comparative study among Tono-pen, Perkins, and Schiötz tonometers.

Authors:  A F Bordon; O Katsumi; T Hirose
Journal:  J Pediatr Ophthalmol Strabismus       Date:  1995 Nov-Dec       Impact factor: 1.402

View more
  9 in total

1.  Intraocular Pressure Changes Following Intravitreal Melphalan and Topotecan for the Treatment of Retinoblastoma With Vitreous Seeding.

Authors:  Matthew D Karl; Jasmine H Francis; Saipriya Iyer; Brian Marr; David H Abramson
Journal:  J Pediatr Ophthalmol Strabismus       Date:  2017-01-17       Impact factor: 1.402

2.  Reply: To PMID 23639132.

Authors:  Scott R Lambert; Hillary M Superak; Mike J Lynn; Allen D Beck
Journal:  Am J Ophthalmol       Date:  2013-09       Impact factor: 5.258

3.  Intraobserver reliability of contact pachymetry in children.

Authors:  Katherine K Weise; Brett Kaminski; Michele Melia; Michael X Repka; Yasmin S Bradfield; Bradley V Davitt; David A Johnson; Raymond T Kraker; Ruth E Manny; Noelle S Matta; Susan Schloff
Journal:  J AAPOS       Date:  2013-04       Impact factor: 1.220

4.  Comparison of Goldmann applanation tonometer, Tono-Pen and noncontact tonometer in children.

Authors:  Usha Kaul Raina; Neha Rathie; Anika Gupta; Shantanu Kumar Gupta; Meenakshi Thakar
Journal:  Oman J Ophthalmol       Date:  2016 Jan-Apr

5.  Possibilities of monitoring intraocular pressure in children using EASYTON transpalpebral tonometer.

Authors:  Elena N Iomdina; Nina Yu Kushnarevich
Journal:  Int Ophthalmol       Date:  2022-01-28       Impact factor: 2.029

6.  Normal intraocular pressure in Egyptian children and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Ibrahim Rezkallah Moussa; Rehab Rashad Kassem; Noha Ahmed Edris; Dalia Hamed Khalil
Journal:  Eye (Lond)       Date:  2021-06-18       Impact factor: 4.456

Review 7.  Teleglaucoma: ready to go?

Authors:  N G Strouthidis; G Chandrasekharan; J P Diamond; I E Murdoch
Journal:  Br J Ophthalmol       Date:  2014-04-10       Impact factor: 4.638

8.  Comparison of Goldmann Applanation, Noncontact Air Puff, and Tono-Pen XL Tonometry in Normal Controls versus Glaucoma Patients at a University Hospital in Riyadh, Saudi Arabia.

Authors:  Essam A Osman; Priscilla W Gikandi; Abdul-Rahman A Al-Jasser; Majeedah Alotaibi; Ahmed Mousa
Journal:  Middle East Afr J Ophthalmol       Date:  2018 Jan-Mar

9.  The relationship between axial length, age and intraocular pressure in children with primary congenital glaucoma.

Authors:  Ibrahim Al-Obaida; Adi Mohammed Al Owaifeer; Khabir Ahmad; Rizwan Malik
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2020-10-20       Impact factor: 4.379

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.