Literature DB >> 23622447

Intraobserver reliability of contact pachymetry in children.

Katherine K Weise1, Brett Kaminski, Michele Melia, Michael X Repka, Yasmin S Bradfield, Bradley V Davitt, David A Johnson, Raymond T Kraker, Ruth E Manny, Noelle S Matta, Susan Schloff.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Central corneal thickness (CCT) is an important measurement in the treatment and management of pediatric glaucoma and potentially of refractive error, but data regarding reliability of CCT measurement in children are limited. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the reliability of CCT measurement with the use of handheld contact pachymetry in children.
METHODS: We conducted a multicenter intraobserver test-retest reliability study of more than 3,400 healthy eyes in children aged from newborn to 17 years by using a handheld contact pachymeter (Pachmate DGH55; DGH Technology Inc, Exton, PA) in 2 clinical settings--with the use of topical anesthesia in the office and with the patient under general anesthesia in a surgical facility.
RESULTS: The overall standard error of measurement, including only measurements with standard deviation ≤5 μm, was 8 μm; the corresponding coefficient of repeatability, or limits within which 95% of test-retest differences fell, was ±22.3 μm. However, standard error of measurement increased as CCT increased, from 6.8 μm for CCT less than 525 μm, to 12.9 μm for CCT 625 μm and greater. The standard error of measurement including measurements with standard deviation >5 μm was 10.5 μm. Age, sex, race/ethnicity group, and examination setting did not influence the magnitude of test-retest differences.
CONCLUSIONS: CCT measurement reliability in children via the Pachmate DGH55 handheld contact pachymeter is similar to that reported for adults. Because thicker CCT measurements are less reliable than thinner measurements, a second measure may be helpful when the first exceeds 575 μm. Reliability is also improved by disregarding measurements with instrument-reported standard deviations >5 μm.
Copyright © 2013 American Association for Pediatric Ophthalmology and Strabismus. Published by Mosby, Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23622447      PMCID: PMC3639436          DOI: 10.1016/j.jaapos.2012.11.005

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J AAPOS        ISSN: 1091-8531            Impact factor:   1.220


  32 in total

1.  Canadian Ophthalmological Society practice guidelines for refractive surgery. Canadian Ophthalmological Society Working Group on Refractive Surgery Practice Guidelines.

Authors: 
Journal:  Can J Ophthalmol       Date:  2000-10       Impact factor: 1.882

2.  Reproducibility of ocular biometry with a new noncontact optical low-coherence reflectometer in children.

Authors:  Afsun Şahin; Hüseyin Gürsoy; Hikmet Başmak; Nilgün Yildirim; Zuhat Usalp; Ertuğrul Çolak
Journal:  Eur J Ophthalmol       Date:  2011 Mar-Apr       Impact factor: 2.597

3.  Reliability coefficients of three corneal pachymeters.

Authors:  N C Wheeler; C M Morantes; R M Kristensen; T H Pettit; D A Lee
Journal:  Am J Ophthalmol       Date:  1992-06-15       Impact factor: 5.258

4.  Central corneal thickness and its relationship to myopia in Chinese adults.

Authors:  H-B Fam; A C S How; M Baskaran; K-L Lim; Y-H Chan; T Aung
Journal:  Br J Ophthalmol       Date:  2006-08-17       Impact factor: 4.638

5.  Central corneal thickness in children.

Authors:  Yasmin S Bradfield; B Michele Melia; Michael X Repka; Brett M Kaminski; Bradley V Davitt; David A Johnson; Raymond T Kraker; Ruth E Manny; Noelle S Matta; Katherine K Weise; Susan Schloff
Journal:  Arch Ophthalmol       Date:  2011-09

6.  Comparison of Tono-Pen and Goldmann applanation tonometers for measurement of intraocular pressure in healthy children.

Authors:  Yasmin S Bradfield; Brett M Kaminski; Michael X Repka; Michele Melia; Bradley V Davitt; David A Johnson; Raymond T Kraker; Ruth E Manny; Noelle S Matta; Susan Schloff; Katherine K Weise
Journal:  J AAPOS       Date:  2012-03-28       Impact factor: 1.220

7.  Association between corneal biomechanical properties and myopia in Chinese subjects.

Authors:  Z Jiang; M Shen; G Mao; D Chen; J Wang; J Qu; F Lu
Journal:  Eye (Lond)       Date:  2011-05-06       Impact factor: 3.775

8.  [Evaluation of central corneal thickness in children and adolescents with type I diabetes mellitus].

Authors:  Beata Urban; Jadwiga Peczyńska; Barbara Głowińska-Olszewska; Mirosława Urban; Alina Bakunowicz-Lazarczyk; Małgorzata Kretowska
Journal:  Klin Oczna       Date:  2007

9.  Central corneal thickness in children with growth hormone deficiency.

Authors:  Fulvio Parentin; Stefano Pensiero
Journal:  Acta Ophthalmol       Date:  2010-09       Impact factor: 3.761

10.  Reliability of corneal thickness and endothelial cell density measures.

Authors:  Jason J Nichols; Gregory M Kosunick; Mark A Bullimore
Journal:  J Refract Surg       Date:  2003 May-Jun       Impact factor: 3.573

View more
  1 in total

1.  Comparison of Measurement of Central Corneal Thickness with Spectral Domain Optical Coherence Tomography and Standard Ultrasonic Pachymeter in Premature Infants.

Authors:  Emre Hekimoglu; Muhammet Kazım Erol; Devrim Toslak; Deniz Turgut Coban; Berna Doğan; Ozgur Yucel
Journal:  J Ophthalmol       Date:  2015-07-22       Impact factor: 1.909

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.