Literature DB >> 20702804

Taste does not determine daily intake of dilute sugar solutions in mice.

J I Glendinning1, F Beltran, L Benton, S Cheng, J Gieseke, J Gillman, H N Spain.   

Abstract

When a rodent licks a sweet-tasting solution, taste circuits in the central nervous system that facilitate stimulus identification, motivate intake, and prepare the body for digestion are activated. Here, we asked whether taste also determines daily intake of sugar solutions in C57BL/6 mice. We tested several dilute concentrations of glucose (167, 250, and 333 mM) and fructose (167, 250, and 333 mM). In addition, we tested saccharin (38 mM), alone and in binary mixture with each of the sugar concentrations, to manipulate sweet taste intensity while holding caloric value constant. In experiment 1, we measured taste responsiveness to the sweetener solutions in two ways: chorda tympani nerve responses and short-term lick tests. For both measures, the mice exhibited the following relative magnitude of responsiveness: binary mixtures > saccharin > individual sugars. In experiment 2, we asked whether the taste measures reliably predicted daily intake of the sweetener solutions. No such relationship was observed. The glucose solutions elicited weak taste responses but high daily intakes, whereas the fructose solutions elicited weak taste responses and low daily intakes. On the other hand, the saccharin + glucose solutions elicited strong taste responses and high daily intakes, while the saccharin + fructose solutions elicited strong taste responses but low daily intakes. Overall, we found that 1) daily intake of the sweetener solutions varied independently of the magnitude of the taste responses and 2) the solutions containing glucose stimulated substantially higher daily intakes than did the solutions containing isomolar concentrations of fructose. Given prior work demonstrating greater postoral stimulation of feeding by glucose than fructose, we propose that the magnitude of postoral nutritive stimulation plays a more important role than does taste in determining daily intake of dilute sugar solutions.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20702804      PMCID: PMC2980460          DOI: 10.1152/ajpregu.00331.2010

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Physiol Regul Integr Comp Physiol        ISSN: 0363-6119            Impact factor:   3.619


  76 in total

1.  A gut feeling for obesity: 7TM sensors on enteroendocrine cells.

Authors:  Maja S Engelstoft; Kristoffer L Egerod; Birgitte Holst; Thue W Schwartz
Journal:  Cell Metab       Date:  2008-12       Impact factor: 27.287

Review 2.  Reward systems and food intake: role of opioids.

Authors:  B A Gosnell; A S Levine
Journal:  Int J Obes (Lond)       Date:  2009-06       Impact factor: 5.095

3.  The capsaicin receptor participates in artificial sweetener aversion.

Authors:  Céline E Riera; Horst Vogel; Sidney A Simon; Sami Damak; Johannes le Coutre
Journal:  Biochem Biophys Res Commun       Date:  2008-09-18       Impact factor: 3.575

4.  T1R3 taste receptor is critical for sucrose but not Polycose taste.

Authors:  Steven Zukerman; John I Glendinning; Robert F Margolskee; Anthony Sclafani
Journal:  Am J Physiol Regul Integr Comp Physiol       Date:  2008-12-17       Impact factor: 3.619

5.  Forebrain activation induced by postoral nutritive substances in rats.

Authors:  Tomokazu Tsurugizawa; Takashi Kondoh; Kunio Torii
Journal:  Neuroreport       Date:  2008-07-16       Impact factor: 1.837

6.  Food reward in the absence of taste receptor signaling.

Authors:  Ivan E de Araujo; Albino J Oliveira-Maia; Tatyana D Sotnikova; Raul R Gainetdinov; Marc G Caron; Miguel A L Nicolelis; Sidney A Simon
Journal:  Neuron       Date:  2008-03-27       Impact factor: 17.173

Review 7.  Learned flavor preferences. The variable potency of post-oral nutrient reinforcers.

Authors:  Karen Ackroff
Journal:  Appetite       Date:  2008-07-07       Impact factor: 3.868

Review 8.  Molecular pharmacology of promiscuous seven transmembrane receptors sensing organic nutrients.

Authors:  Petrine Wellendorph; Lars Dan Johansen; Hans Bräuner-Osborne
Journal:  Mol Pharmacol       Date:  2009-06-01       Impact factor: 4.436

Review 9.  Linking peripheral taste processes to behavior.

Authors:  Alan C Spector; John I Glendinning
Journal:  Curr Opin Neurobiol       Date:  2009-08-10       Impact factor: 6.627

10.  Multiple sweet receptors and transduction pathways revealed in knockout mice by temperature dependence and gurmarin sensitivity.

Authors:  Tadahiro Ohkuri; Keiko Yasumatsu; Nao Horio; Masafumi Jyotaki; Robert F Margolskee; Yuzo Ninomiya
Journal:  Am J Physiol Regul Integr Comp Physiol       Date:  2009-02-11       Impact factor: 3.619

View more
  17 in total

1.  Gut T1R3 sweet taste receptors do not mediate sucrose-conditioned flavor preferences in mice.

Authors:  Anthony Sclafani; Damien S Glass; Robert F Margolskee; John I Glendinning
Journal:  Am J Physiol Regul Integr Comp Physiol       Date:  2010-10-06       Impact factor: 3.619

2.  Rapid stimulus-bound suppression of intake in response to an intraduodenal nonnutritive sweetener after training with nutritive sugars predicting malaise.

Authors:  Lindsey A Schier; Terry L Davidson; Terry L Powley
Journal:  Am J Physiol Regul Integr Comp Physiol       Date:  2012-03-14       Impact factor: 3.619

3.  Flavor preferences conditioned by intragastric glucose but not fructose or galactose in C57BL/6J mice.

Authors:  Anthony Sclafani; Karen Ackroff
Journal:  Physiol Behav       Date:  2012-03-14

4.  Strain differences in sucrose- and fructose-conditioned flavor preferences in mice.

Authors:  Alexander Pinhas; Michael Aviel; Michael Koen; Simon Gurgov; Vanessa Acosta; Michael Israel; Leonid Kakuriev; Elena Guskova; Isabelle Fuzailov; Khalid Touzani; Anthony Sclafani; Richard J Bodnar
Journal:  Physiol Behav       Date:  2011-09-14

5.  Impact of T1r3 and Trpm5 on carbohydrate preference and acceptance in C57BL/6 mice.

Authors:  Steven Zukerman; John I Glendinning; Robert F Margolskee; Anthony Sclafani
Journal:  Chem Senses       Date:  2013-04-01       Impact factor: 3.160

6.  Taste uncoupled from nutrition fails to sustain the reinforcing properties of food.

Authors:  Jeff A Beeler; James E McCutcheon; Zhen F H Cao; Mari Murakami; Erin Alexander; Mitchell F Roitman; Xiaoxi Zhuang
Journal:  Eur J Neurosci       Date:  2012-06-19       Impact factor: 3.386

7.  Flavor preference conditioning by different sugars in sweet ageusic Trpm5 knockout mice.

Authors:  Anthony Sclafani; Karen Ackroff
Journal:  Physiol Behav       Date:  2014-12-12

8.  Post-oral glucose stimulation of intake and conditioned flavor preference in C57BL/6J mice: a concentration-response study.

Authors:  Steven Zukerman; Karen Ackroff; Anthony Sclafani
Journal:  Physiol Behav       Date:  2012-11-28

9.  SGLT1 sugar transporter/sensor is required for post-oral glucose appetition.

Authors:  Anthony Sclafani; Hermann Koepsell; Karen Ackroff
Journal:  Am J Physiol Regul Integr Comp Physiol       Date:  2016-01-20       Impact factor: 3.619

10.  Experience with sugar modifies behavioral but not taste-evoked medullary responses to sweeteners in mice.

Authors:  Stuart A McCaughey; John I Glendinning
Journal:  Chem Senses       Date:  2013-10-01       Impact factor: 3.160

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.