Literature DB >> 20865138

AUDITORY-PHONETIC PROJECTION AND LEXICAL STRUCTURE IN THE RECOGNITION OF SINE-WAVE WORDS.

Robert E Remez1, Kathryn R Dubowski, Robin S Broder, Morgana L Davids, Yael S Grossman, Marina Moskalenko, Jennifer S Pardo, Sara Maria Hasbun.   

Abstract

Speech remains intelligible despite the elimination of canonical acoustic correlates of phonemes from the spectrum. A portion of this perceptual flexibility can be attributed to modulation sensitivity in the auditory-to-phonetic projection, though signal-independent properties of lexical neighborhoods also affect intelligibility in utterances composed of words. Three tests were conducted to estimate the effects of exposure to natural and sine-wave samples of speech in this kind of perceptual versatility. First, sine-wave versions of the easy/hard word sets were created, modeled on the speech samples of a single talker. The performance difference in recognition of easy and hard words was used to index the perceptual reliance on signal-independent properties of lexical contrasts. Second, several kinds of exposure produced familiarity with an aspect of sine-wave speech: 1) sine-wave sentences modeled on the same talker; 2) sine-wave sentences modeled on a different talker, to create familiarity with a sine-wave carrier; and 3) natural sentences spoken by the same talker, to create familiarity with the idiolect expressed in the sine-wave words. Recognition performance with both easy and hard sine-wave words improved after exposure only to sine-wave sentences modeled on the same talker. Third, a control test showed that signal-independent uncertainty is a plausible cause of differences in recognition of easy and hard sine-wave words. The conditions of beneficial exposure reveal the specificity of attention underlying versatility in speech perception.

Entities:  

Year:  2009        PMID: 20865138      PMCID: PMC2943240     

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform        ISSN: 0096-1523            Impact factor:   3.332


  38 in total

1.  On the bistability of sine wave analogues of speech.

Authors:  R E Remez; J S Pardo; R L Piorkowski; P E Rubin
Journal:  Psychol Sci       Date:  2001-01

2.  Chimaeric sounds reveal dichotomies in auditory perception.

Authors:  Zachary M Smith; Bertrand Delgutte; Andrew J Oxenham
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2002-03-07       Impact factor: 49.962

3.  Short-term reorganization of auditory analysis induced by phonetic experience.

Authors:  Einat Liebenthal; Jeffrey R Binder; Rebecca L Piorkowski; Robert E Remez
Journal:  J Cogn Neurosci       Date:  2003-05-15       Impact factor: 3.225

4.  Listener sensitivity to individual talker differences in voice-onset-time.

Authors:  J Sean Allen; Joanne L Miller
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2004-06       Impact factor: 1.840

5.  On the perception of speech from time-varying acoustic information: contributions of amplitude variation.

Authors:  R Remez; P E Rubin
Journal:  Percept Psychophys       Date:  1990-10

6.  Rapid adaptation to foreign-accented English.

Authors:  Constance M Clarke; Merrill F Garrett
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2004-12       Impact factor: 1.840

7.  Perceptual learning in speech: stability over time.

Authors:  Frank Eisner; James M McQueen
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2006-04       Impact factor: 1.840

8.  Some considerations in evaluating spoken word recognition by normal-hearing, noise-masked normal-hearing, and cochlear implant listeners. I: The effects of response format.

Authors:  M S Sommers; K I Kirk; D B Pisoni
Journal:  Ear Hear       Date:  1997-04       Impact factor: 3.570

9.  Perceptual normalization of vowels produced by sinusoidal voices.

Authors:  R E Remez; P E Rubin; L C Nygaard; W A Howell
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform       Date:  1987-02       Impact factor: 3.332

10.  The modulation transfer function for speech intelligibility.

Authors:  Taffeta M Elliott; Frédéric E Theunissen
Journal:  PLoS Comput Biol       Date:  2009-03-06       Impact factor: 4.475

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.