Literature DB >> 21068039

The intelligibility of noise-vocoded speech: spectral information available from across-channel comparison of amplitude envelopes.

Brian Roberts1, Robert J Summers, Peter J Bailey.   

Abstract

Noise-vocoded (NV) speech is often regarded as conveying phonetic information primarily through temporal-envelope cues rather than spectral cues. However, listeners may infer the formant frequencies in the vocal-tract output-a key source of phonetic detail-from across-band differences in amplitude when speech is processed through a small number of channels. The potential utility of this spectral information was assessed for NV speech created by filtering sentences into six frequency bands, and using the amplitude envelope of each band (≤30 Hz) to modulate a matched noise-band carrier (N). Bands were paired, corresponding to F1 (≈N1 + N2), F2 (≈N3 + N4) and the higher formants (F3' ≈ N5 + N6), such that the frequency contour of each formant was implied by variations in relative amplitude between bands within the corresponding pair. Three-formant analogues (F0 = 150 Hz) of the NV stimuli were synthesized using frame-by-frame reconstruction of the frequency and amplitude of each formant. These analogues were less intelligible than the NV stimuli or analogues created using contours extracted from spectrograms of the original sentences, but more intelligible than when the frequency contours were replaced with constant (mean) values. Across-band comparisons of amplitude envelopes in NV speech can provide phonetically important information about the frequency contours of the underlying formants.

Mesh:

Year:  2010        PMID: 21068039      PMCID: PMC3081737          DOI: 10.1098/rspb.2010.1554

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Proc Biol Sci        ISSN: 0962-8452            Impact factor:   5.349


  28 in total

1.  Inferior frontal gyrus activation predicts individual differences in perceptual learning of cochlear-implant simulations.

Authors:  Frank Eisner; Carolyn McGettigan; Andrew Faulkner; Stuart Rosen; Sophie K Scott
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2010-05-26       Impact factor: 6.167

2.  Spectral and temporal cues for speech recognition: implications for auditory prostheses.

Authors:  Li Xu; Bryan E Pfingst
Journal:  Hear Res       Date:  2007-12-28       Impact factor: 3.208

3.  Spectral integration of dynamic cues in the perception of syllable-initial stops.

Authors:  Robert Allen Fox; Ewa Jacewicz; Lawrence L Feth
Journal:  Phonetica       Date:  2008-05-28       Impact factor: 1.759

4.  The importance of temporal fine structure information in speech at different spectral regions for normal-hearing and hearing-impaired subjects.

Authors:  Kathryn Hopkins; Brian C J Moore
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2010-03       Impact factor: 1.840

5.  Effects of envelope bandwidth on the intelligibility of sine- and noise-vocoded speech.

Authors:  Pamela Souza; Stuart Rosen
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2009-08       Impact factor: 1.840

6.  Recognition of interrupted sentences under conditions of spectral degradation.

Authors:  Monita Chatterjee; Fabiola Peredo; Desirae Nelson; Deniz Başkent
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2010-02       Impact factor: 1.840

7.  Transfer of auditory perceptual learning with spectrally reduced speech to speech and nonspeech tasks: implications for cochlear implants.

Authors:  Jeremy L Loebach; David B Pisoni; Mario A Svirsky
Journal:  Ear Hear       Date:  2009-12       Impact factor: 3.570

8.  Contribution of consonant landmarks to speech recognition in simulated acoustic-electric hearing.

Authors:  Fei Chen; Philipos C Loizou
Journal:  Ear Hear       Date:  2010-04       Impact factor: 3.570

9.  On the number of auditory filter outputs needed to understand speech: further evidence for auditory channel independence.

Authors:  Frédéric Apoux; Eric W Healy
Journal:  Hear Res       Date:  2009-06-16       Impact factor: 3.208

10.  Children discover the spectral skeletons in their native language before the amplitude envelopes.

Authors:  Susan Nittrouer; Joanna H Lowenstein; Robert R Packer
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform       Date:  2009-08       Impact factor: 3.332

View more
  12 in total

1.  Effects of the rate of formant-frequency variation on the grouping of formants in speech perception.

Authors:  Robert J Summers; Peter J Bailey; Brian Roberts
Journal:  J Assoc Res Otolaryngol       Date:  2011-12-13

2.  Arrays of rectangular subcritical speech bands: Intelligibility improved by noise-vocoding and expanding to critical bandwidths.

Authors:  Richard M Warren; James A Bashford; Peter W Lenz
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2018-04       Impact factor: 1.840

3.  Spectral and Temporal Envelope Cues for Human and Automatic Speech Recognition in Noise.

Authors:  Guangxin Hu; Sarah C Determan; Yue Dong; Alec T Beeve; Joshua E Collins; Yan Gai
Journal:  J Assoc Res Otolaryngol       Date:  2019-11-22

4.  Rapid computations of spectrotemporal prediction error support perception of degraded speech.

Authors:  Ediz Sohoglu; Matthew H Davis
Journal:  Elife       Date:  2020-11-04       Impact factor: 8.140

5.  Phase-locked responses to speech in human auditory cortex are enhanced during comprehension.

Authors:  Jonathan E Peelle; Joachim Gross; Matthew H Davis
Journal:  Cereb Cortex       Date:  2012-05-17       Impact factor: 5.357

6.  Acoustic source characteristics, across-formant integration, and speech intelligibility under competitive conditions.

Authors:  Brian Roberts; Robert J Summers; Peter J Bailey
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform       Date:  2015-03-09       Impact factor: 3.332

7.  Formant-frequency variation and informational masking of speech by extraneous formants: evidence against dynamic and speech-specific acoustical constraints.

Authors:  Brian Roberts; Robert J Summers; Peter J Bailey
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform       Date:  2014-05-19       Impact factor: 3.332

8.  The Contribution of Cognitive Factors to Individual Differences in Understanding Noise-Vocoded Speech in Young and Older Adults.

Authors:  Stephanie Rosemann; Carsten Gießing; Jale Özyurt; Rebecca Carroll; Sebastian Puschmann; Christiane M Thiel
Journal:  Front Hum Neurosci       Date:  2017-06-07       Impact factor: 3.169

9.  An acoustic key to eight languages/dialects: Factor analyses of critical-band-filtered speech.

Authors:  Kazuo Ueda; Yoshitaka Nakajima
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2017-02-15       Impact factor: 4.379

10.  Top-down influences of written text on perceived clarity of degraded speech.

Authors:  Ediz Sohoglu; Jonathan E Peelle; Robert P Carlyon; Matthew H Davis
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform       Date:  2013-06-10       Impact factor: 3.332

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.