Literature DB >> 2710622

Discovering phonetic coherence in acoustic patterns.

C T Best, M Studdert-Kennedy, S Manuel, J Rubin-Spitz.   

Abstract

Despite spectral and temporal discontinuities in the speech signal, listeners normally report coherent phonetic patterns corresponding to the phonemes of a language that they know. What is the basis for the internal coherence of phonetic segments? According to one account, listeners achieve coherence by extracting and integrating discrete cues; according to another, coherence arises automatically from general principles of auditory form perception; according to a third, listeners perceive speech patterns as coherent because they are the acoustic consequences of coordinated articulatory gestures in a familiar language. We tested these accounts in three experiments by training listeners to hear a continuum of three-tone, modulated sine wave patterns, modeled after a minimal pair contrast between three-formant synthetic speech syllables, either as distorted speech signals carrying a phonetic contrast (speech listeners) or as distorted musical chords carrying a nonspeech auditory contrast (music listeners). The music listeners could neither integrate the sine wave patterns nor perceive their auditory coherence to arrive at consistent, categorical percepts, whereas the speech listeners judged the patterns as speech almost as reliably as the synthetic syllables on which they were modeled. The outcome is consistent with the hypothesis that listeners perceive the phonetic coherence of a speech signal by recognizing acoustic patterns that reflect the coordinated articulatory gestures from which they arose.

Mesh:

Year:  1989        PMID: 2710622     DOI: 10.3758/bf03210703

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Percept Psychophys        ISSN: 0031-5117


  15 in total

1.  Perception of temporal order in vowel sequences with and without formant transitions.

Authors:  M F Dorman; J E Cutting; L J Raphael
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform       Date:  1975-05       Impact factor: 3.332

2.  Integral processing of phonemes: evidence for a phonetic mode of perception.

Authors:  G R Tomiak; J W Mullennix; J R Sawusch
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  1987-03       Impact factor: 1.840

Review 3.  Toward a theory of speech perception.

Authors:  R A Cole; B Scott
Journal:  Psychol Rev       Date:  1974-07       Impact factor: 8.934

4.  Skilled actions: a task-dynamic approach.

Authors:  E Saltzman; J A Kelso
Journal:  Psychol Rev       Date:  1987-01       Impact factor: 8.934

5.  Perceiving vowels in the presence of another sound: constraints on formant perception.

Authors:  C J Darwin
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  1984-12       Impact factor: 1.840

6.  Information in speech: observations on the perception of [s]-stop clusters.

Authors:  P J Bailey; Q Summerfield
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform       Date:  1980-08       Impact factor: 3.332

7.  The perceptual classification of speech.

Authors:  P W Jusczyk; L B Smith; C Murphy
Journal:  Percept Psychophys       Date:  1981-07

8.  The case against a speech mode of perception.

Authors:  M E Schouten
Journal:  Acta Psychol (Amst)       Date:  1980-01

9.  Speech perception without traditional speech cues.

Authors:  R E Remez; P E Rubin; D B Pisoni; T D Carrell
Journal:  Science       Date:  1981-05-22       Impact factor: 47.728

10.  Japanese quail can learn phonetic categories.

Authors:  K R Kluender; R L Diehl; P R Killeen
Journal:  Science       Date:  1987-09-04       Impact factor: 47.728

View more
  12 in total

1.  The effect of amplitude comodulation on auditory object formation in sentence perception.

Authors:  T D Carrell; J M Opie
Journal:  Percept Psychophys       Date:  1992-10

2.  On the perception of speech from time-varying acoustic information: contributions of amplitude variation.

Authors:  R Remez; P E Rubin
Journal:  Percept Psychophys       Date:  1990-10

3.  Young infants' perception of liquid coarticulatory influences on following stop consonants.

Authors:  C A Fowler; C T Best; G W McRoberts
Journal:  Percept Psychophys       Date:  1990-12

4.  Perceptual coherence in listeners having longstanding childhood hearing losses, listeners with adult-onset hearing losses, and listeners with normal hearing.

Authors:  Andrea Pittman
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2008-01       Impact factor: 1.840

5.  Learning to perceptually organize speech signals in native fashion.

Authors:  Susan Nittrouer; Joanna H Lowenstein
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2010-03       Impact factor: 1.840

6.  New Approaches to the Study of Childhood Language Disorders.

Authors:  Susan Nittrouer; Bruce Pennington
Journal:  Curr Dir Psychol Sci       Date:  2010-10-01

7.  Explaining coherence in coherence masking protection for adults and children.

Authors:  Eric Tarr; Susan Nittrouer
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2013-06       Impact factor: 1.840

8.  Formant-frequency discrimination of synthesized vowels in budgerigars (Melopsittacus undulatus) and humans.

Authors:  Kenneth S Henry; Kassidy N Amburgey; Kristina S Abrams; Fabio Idrobo; Laurel H Carney
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2017-10       Impact factor: 1.840

9.  Left posterior temporal regions are sensitive to auditory categorization.

Authors:  Rutvik Desai; Einat Liebenthal; Eric Waldron; Jeffrey R Binder
Journal:  J Cogn Neurosci       Date:  2008-07       Impact factor: 3.225

10.  Perceptual organization of speech signals by children with and without dyslexia.

Authors:  Susan Nittrouer; Joanna H Lowenstein
Journal:  Res Dev Disabil       Date:  2013-05-21
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.