Literature DB >> 2951488

Perceptual normalization of vowels produced by sinusoidal voices.

R E Remez, P E Rubin, L C Nygaard, W A Howell.   

Abstract

When listeners hear a sinusoidal replica of a sentence, they perceive linguistic properties despite the absence of short-time acoustic components typical of vocal signals. Is this accomplished by a postperceptual strategy that accommodates the anomalous acoustic pattern ad hoc, or is a sinusoidal sentence understood by the ordinary means of speech perception? If listeners treat sinusoidal signals as speech signals however unlike speech they may be, then perception should exhibit the commonplace sensitivity to the dimensions of the originating vocal tract. The present study, employing sinusoidal signals, raised this issue by testing the identification of target /bVt/, or b-vowel-t, syllables occurring in sentences that differed in the range of frequency variation of their component tones. Vowel quality of target syllables was influenced by this acoustic correlate of vocal-tract scale, implying that the perception of these nonvocal signals includes a process of vocal-tract scale, implying that the perception of these nonvocal signals includes a process of vocal-tract normalization. Converging evidence suggests that the perception of sinusoidal vowels depends on the relation among component tones and not on the phonetic likeness of each tone in isolation. The findings support the general claim that sinusoidal replicas of natural speech signals are perceptible phonetically because they preserve time-varying information present in natural signals.

Mesh:

Year:  1987        PMID: 2951488     DOI: 10.1037//0096-1523.13.1.40

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform        ISSN: 0096-1523            Impact factor:   3.332


  8 in total

1.  Learning to recognize talkers from natural, sinewave, and reversed speech samples.

Authors:  Sonya M Sheffert; David B Pisoni; Jennifer M Fellowes; Robert E Remez
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform       Date:  2002-12       Impact factor: 3.332

2.  On the perception of speech from time-varying acoustic information: contributions of amplitude variation.

Authors:  R Remez; P E Rubin
Journal:  Percept Psychophys       Date:  1990-10

3.  ANALOGY AND DISANALOGY IN PRODUCTION AND PERCEPTION OF SPEECH.

Authors:  Robert E Remez
Journal:  Lang Cogn Neurosci       Date:  2015-03-01       Impact factor: 2.331

4.  Cross-modal transfer of talker-identity learning.

Authors:  Dominique Simmons; Josh Dorsi; James W Dias; Lawrence D Rosenblum
Journal:  Atten Percept Psychophys       Date:  2020-10-20       Impact factor: 2.199

5.  AUDITORY-PHONETIC PROJECTION AND LEXICAL STRUCTURE IN THE RECOGNITION OF SINE-WAVE WORDS.

Authors:  Robert E Remez; Kathryn R Dubowski; Robin S Broder; Morgana L Davids; Yael S Grossman; Marina Moskalenko; Jennifer S Pardo; Sara Maria Hasbun
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform       Date:  2009-04-01       Impact factor: 3.332

6.  Perception of sinewave vowels.

Authors:  James M Hillenbrand; Michael J Clark; Carter A Baer
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2011-06       Impact factor: 1.840

7.  Constraints on the processes responsible for the extrinsic normalization of vowels.

Authors:  Matthias J Sjerps; Holger Mitterer; James M McQueen
Journal:  Atten Percept Psychophys       Date:  2011-05       Impact factor: 2.199

Review 8.  Revisiting vocal perception in non-human animals: a review of vowel discrimination, speaker voice recognition, and speaker normalization.

Authors:  Buddhamas Kriengwatana; Paola Escudero; Carel Ten Cate
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2015-01-13
  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.