Literature DB >> 8768181

Limits on phonetic integration in duplex perception.

D H Whalen1, A M Liberman.   

Abstract

The telling fact about duplex perception is that listeners integrate into a unitary phonetic percept signals that are coherent from a phonetic point of view, even though the signals are, on purely auditory grounds, separate sources. Here we explore the limits on the integration of a sinusoidal consonant cue (the F3 transition for [da] vs. [ga]) with the resonances of the remainder of the syllable. Perceiving duplexly, listeners hear the whistle of the sinusoid, but also the [da] and [ga] for which the sinusoid provides the critical information. In the first experiment, phonetic integration was significantly reduced, but not to zero, by a precursor that extended the transition cue forward in time so that it started 50 msec before the cue. The effect was the same above and below the duplexity threshold (the intensity of sinusoid in the combined pattern at which the whistle was just barely audible). In the second experiment, integration was reduced once again by the precursor, and also, but only below the duplexity threshold, by harmonics of the cues that were simultaneous with it. The third experiment showed that the simultaneous harmonics reduced phonetic integration only by serving as distractors while also permitting the conclusion that the precursor produced its effects by making the cue part of a coherent and competing auditory pattern, and so "capturing" it. The fourth experiment supported this interpretation by showing that for some subjects the amount of capture was reduced when the capturing tone was itself captured by being made part of a tonal complex. The results support the assumption that the independent phonetic system will integrate across disparate sources according to the cohesive power of that system as measured against the evidence for separate sources.

Mesh:

Year:  1996        PMID: 8768181     DOI: 10.3758/bf03205488

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Percept Psychophys        ISSN: 0031-5117


  24 in total

1.  Modeling phoneme perception. I: Categorical perception.

Authors:  M E Schouten; A J van Hessen
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  1992-10       Impact factor: 1.840

2.  On the perception of speech from time-varying acoustic information: contributions of amplitude variation.

Authors:  R Remez; P E Rubin
Journal:  Percept Psychophys       Date:  1990-10

3.  A new version of duplex perception: evidence for phonetic and nonphonetic fusion.

Authors:  L C Nygaard; P D Eimas
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  1990-07       Impact factor: 1.840

4.  Masking and stimulus intensity effects on duplex perception: a confirmation of the dissociation between speech and nonspeech modes.

Authors:  S Bentin; V Mann
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  1990-07       Impact factor: 1.840

5.  The effects of auditory streaming on duplex perception.

Authors:  V Ciocca; A S Bregman
Journal:  Percept Psychophys       Date:  1989-07

Review 6.  Perception of the speech code.

Authors:  A M Liberman; F S Cooper; D P Shankweiler; M Studdert-Kennedy
Journal:  Psychol Rev       Date:  1967-11       Impact factor: 8.934

7.  Letter: Dichotic release from masking for speech.

Authors:  T C Rand
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  1974-03       Impact factor: 1.840

8.  Anomalous stereoscopic depth perception.

Authors:  W Richards
Journal:  J Opt Soc Am       Date:  1971-03

9.  A reexamination of duplex perception evoked by intensity differences.

Authors:  P J Bailey; P Herrmann
Journal:  Percept Psychophys       Date:  1993-07

10.  The motor theory of speech perception revised.

Authors:  A M Liberman; I G Mattingly
Journal:  Cognition       Date:  1985-10
View more
  5 in total

1.  Variable perception of white noise in ambiguous phonetic contexts: the case of /p/ and /f/.

Authors:  Valeriy Shafiro; Lawrence J Raphael
Journal:  J Psycholinguist Res       Date:  2007-11

2.  Object-based auditory and visual attention.

Authors:  Barbara G Shinn-Cunningham
Journal:  Trends Cogn Sci       Date:  2008-04-07       Impact factor: 20.229

3.  An account of the Speech-to-Song Illusion using Node Structure Theory.

Authors:  Nichol Castro; Joshua M Mendoza; Elizabeth C Tampke; Michael S Vitevitch
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2018-06-08       Impact factor: 3.240

4.  Effects of stimulus response compatibility on covert imitation of vowels.

Authors:  Patti Adank; Helen Nuttall; Harold Bekkering; Gwijde Maegherman
Journal:  Atten Percept Psychophys       Date:  2018-07       Impact factor: 2.199

5.  Congruent aero-tactile stimuli bias perception of voicing continua.

Authors:  Dolly Goldenberg; Mark K Tiede; Ryan T Bennett; D H Whalen
Journal:  Front Hum Neurosci       Date:  2022-07-15       Impact factor: 3.473

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.