Literature DB >> 31770659

Reward learning biases the direction of saccades.

Ming-Ray Liao1, Brian A Anderson2.   

Abstract

The role of associative reward learning in guiding feature-based attention and spatial attention is well established. However, no studies have looked at the extent to which reward learning can modulate the direction of saccades during visual search. Here, we introduced a novel reward learning paradigm to examine whether reward-associated directions of eye movements can modulate performance in different visual search tasks. Participants had to fixate a peripheral target before fixating one of four disks that subsequently appeared in each cardinal position. This was followed by reward feedback contingent upon the direction chosen, where one direction consistently yielded a high reward. Thus, reward was tied to the direction of saccades rather than the absolute location of the stimulus fixated. Participants selected the target in the high-value direction on the majority of trials, demonstrating robust learning of the task contingencies. In an untimed visual foraging task that followed, which was performed in extinction, initial saccades were reliably biased in the previously rewarded-associated direction. In a second experiment, following the same training procedure, eye movements in the previously high-value direction were facilitated in a saccade-to-target task. Our findings suggest that rewarding directional eye movements biases oculomotor search patterns in a manner that is robust to extinction and generalizes across stimuli and task.
Copyright © 2019 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Eye movements; Foraging; Overt attention; Reinforcement; Reward learning; Visual search

Mesh:

Year:  2019        PMID: 31770659      PMCID: PMC7028500          DOI: 10.1016/j.cognition.2019.104145

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Cognition        ISSN: 0010-0277


  61 in total

1.  What the brain stem tells the frontal cortex. I. Oculomotor signals sent from superior colliculus to frontal eye field via mediodorsal thalamus.

Authors:  Marc A Sommer; Robert H Wurtz
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2003-10-22       Impact factor: 2.714

2.  Reward modulates oculomotor competition between differently valued stimuli.

Authors:  Berno Bucker; Jeroen D Silvis; Mieke Donk; Jan Theeuwes
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  2015-02-07       Impact factor: 1.886

3.  On the representational nature of value-driven spatial attentional biases.

Authors:  Brian A Anderson; Haena Kim
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2018-10-10       Impact factor: 2.714

4.  Value-driven attentional and oculomotor capture during goal-directed, unconstrained viewing.

Authors:  Brian A Anderson; Steven Yantis
Journal:  Atten Percept Psychophys       Date:  2012-11       Impact factor: 2.199

5.  Altering spatial priority maps via reward-based learning.

Authors:  Leonardo Chelazzi; Jana Eštočinová; Riccardo Calletti; Emanuele Lo Gerfo; Ilaria Sani; Chiara Della Libera; Elisa Santandrea
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2014-06-18       Impact factor: 6.167

6.  A comparison of the intranigral distribution of nigrotectal neurons labeled with horseradish peroxidase in the monkey, cat, and rat.

Authors:  R M Beckstead; S B Edwards; A Frankfurter
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  1981-02       Impact factor: 6.167

7.  Valuable Orientations Capture Attention.

Authors:  Patryk A Laurent; Michelle G Hall; Brian A Anderson; Steven Yantis
Journal:  Vis cogn       Date:  2015-01-01

8.  Modulation of spatial attention by goals, statistical learning, and monetary reward.

Authors:  Yuhong V Jiang; Li Z Sha; Roger W Remington
Journal:  Atten Percept Psychophys       Date:  2015-10       Impact factor: 2.199

Review 9.  Exploration versus exploitation in space, mind, and society.

Authors:  Thomas T Hills; Peter M Todd; David Lazer; A David Redish; Iain D Couzin
Journal:  Trends Cogn Sci       Date:  2014-12-03       Impact factor: 20.229

10.  Rewards modulate saccade latency but not exogenous spatial attention.

Authors:  Stephen Dunne; Amanda Ellison; Daniel T Smith
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2015-07-28
View more
  5 in total

1.  Selection history is relative.

Authors:  Ming-Ray Liao; Mark K Britton; Brian A Anderson
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  2020-07-11       Impact factor: 1.886

2.  Pavlovian learning in the selection history-dependent control of overt spatial attention.

Authors:  Brian A Anderson; Ming-Ray Liao; Laurent Grégoire
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform       Date:  2022-06-23       Impact factor: 3.077

Review 3.  An adaptive view of attentional control.

Authors:  Brian A Anderson
Journal:  Am Psychol       Date:  2021-12

4.  Inertia in value-driven attention.

Authors:  Ming-Ray Liao; Brian A Anderson
Journal:  Learn Mem       Date:  2020-11-16       Impact factor: 2.460

5.  Using aversive conditioning with near-real-time feedback to shape eye movements during naturalistic viewing.

Authors:  Brian A Anderson
Journal:  Behav Res Methods       Date:  2020-09-11
  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.