Literature DB >> 22411582

Reaching to recover balance in unpredictable circumstances: is online visual control of the reach-to-grasp reaction necessary or sufficient?

Kenneth C Cheng1, Sandra M McKay, Emily C King, Brian E Maki.   

Abstract

Reaching to grasp an object for support is a common and functionally important response to sudden balance perturbation. The need to react very rapidly (to prevent falling) imposes temporal constraints on acquisition and processing of the visuospatial information (VSI) needed to guide the reaching movement. Previous results suggested that the CNS may deal with these constraints by using VSI stored in memory proactively, prior to perturbation onset; however, the extent to which online visual control is necessary or sufficient to guide these reactions has not been established. This study examined the speed, accuracy, and effectiveness of perturbation-evoked reach-to-grasp reactions when forced to rely entirely on either online- or stored-VSI by using liquid-crystal goggles to occlude vision either before or after perturbation onset. The reactions were evoked, in twelve healthy young adults, via sudden unpredictable antero-posterior platform translation (barriers deterred stepping reactions). Prior to perturbation onset, a small cylindrical handhold was positioned unpredictably (by a motor-driven device) at one of four locations in front of the subject. Results indicated that equilibrium could be recovered successfully by grasping the handhold using either online-VSI or stored-VSI to guide the arm reaction; however, both sources of VSI were required for optimal performance. Reach initiation and arm movement were slowed when dependent on online-VSI, whereas reach accuracy and grip formation were impaired when dependent on stored-VSI. Comparison with normal-VSI trials suggests that both sources of VSI are utilized when grasping a small handhold for support under normal visual conditions, with stored-VSI predominating during initiation/transport and online-VSI contributing primarily to final target acquisition/prehension.

Mesh:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22411582     DOI: 10.1007/s00221-012-3051-6

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Exp Brain Res        ISSN: 0014-4819            Impact factor:   1.972


  31 in total

1.  Resolving conflicts in task demands during balance recovery: does holding an object inhibit compensatory grasping?

Authors:  Hamid Bateni; Aleksandra Zecevic; William E McIlroy; Brian E Maki
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2004-02-03       Impact factor: 1.972

2.  Initiation of rapid reach-and-grasp balance reactions: is a pre-formed visuospatial map used in controlling the initial arm trajectory?

Authors:  Mohammad Ghafouri; William E McIlroy; Brian E Maki
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2004-02-24       Impact factor: 1.972

3.  The use of peripheral vision to guide perturbation-evoked reach-to-grasp balance-recovery reactions.

Authors:  Emily C King; Sandra M McKay; Kenneth C Cheng; Brian E Maki
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2010-10-19       Impact factor: 1.972

4.  Redirection of gaze and switching of attention during rapid stepping reactions evoked by unpredictable postural perturbation.

Authors:  John L Zettel; Andrea Holbeche; William E McIlroy; Brian E Maki
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2005-05-10       Impact factor: 1.972

Review 5.  Whole-body responses: neural control and implications for rehabilitation and fall prevention.

Authors:  Daniel S Marigold; John E Misiaszek
Journal:  Neuroscientist       Date:  2009-02       Impact factor: 7.519

6.  Stepping to recover balance in complex environments: is online visual control of the foot motion necessary or sufficient?

Authors:  Carol Y Scovil; John L Zettel; Brian E Maki
Journal:  Neurosci Lett       Date:  2008-08-28       Impact factor: 3.046

7.  Influence of lateral destabilization on compensatory stepping responses.

Authors:  B E Maki; W E McIlroy; S D Perry
Journal:  J Biomech       Date:  1996-03       Impact factor: 2.712

8.  The influence of premovement visual information on manual aiming.

Authors:  D Elliott; J Madalena
Journal:  Q J Exp Psychol A       Date:  1987-08

Review 9.  The role of limb movements in maintaining upright stance: the "change-in-support" strategy.

Authors:  B E Maki; W E McIlroy
Journal:  Phys Ther       Date:  1997-05

10.  Early activation of arm muscles follows external perturbation of upright stance.

Authors:  W E McIlroy; B E Maki
Journal:  Neurosci Lett       Date:  1995-01-30       Impact factor: 3.046

View more
  7 in total

1.  Motor preparation for compensatory reach-to-grasp responses when viewing a wall-mounted safety handle.

Authors:  David A E Bolton; David M Cole; Blake Butler; Mahmoud Mansour; Garrett Rydalch; Douglas W McDannald; Sarah E Schwartz
Journal:  Cortex       Date:  2019-03-21       Impact factor: 4.027

2.  Can we use peripheral vision to create a visuospatial map for compensatory reach-to-grasp reactions?

Authors:  Laura Williams; Veronica Miyasike-daSilva; W Richard Staines; Stephen D Prentice; William E McIlroy
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2022-09-15       Impact factor: 2.064

3.  Role of peripheral vision in rapid perturbation-evoked reach-to-grasp reactions.

Authors:  Sakineh B Akram; Veronica Miyasike-daSilva; Karen Van Ooteghem; William E McIlroy
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2013-06-28       Impact factor: 1.972

4.  Relationship between visuo-perceptual function and manual dexterity in community-dwelling older adults.

Authors:  Chiang-Soon Song
Journal:  J Phys Ther Sci       Date:  2015-06-30

Review 5.  Time-interval for integration of stabilizing haptic and visual information in subjects balancing under static and dynamic conditions.

Authors:  Jean-Louis Honeine; Marco Schieppati
Journal:  Front Syst Neurosci       Date:  2014-10-06

6.  Age-Related Differences in Arm and Trunk Responses to First and Repeated Exposure to Laterally Induced Imbalances.

Authors:  Ruth Y Akinlosotu; Nesreen Alissa; John D Sorkin; George F Wittenberg; Kelly P Westlake
Journal:  Brain Sci       Date:  2020-08-20

7.  Do aging and dual-tasking impair the capacity to store and retrieve visuospatial information needed to guide perturbation-evoked reach-to-grasp reactions?

Authors:  Kenneth C Cheng; Jay Pratt; Brian E Maki
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2013-11-05       Impact factor: 3.240

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.