Literature DB >> 18771705

Stepping to recover balance in complex environments: is online visual control of the foot motion necessary or sufficient?

Carol Y Scovil1, John L Zettel, Brian E Maki.   

Abstract

Rapid step reactions evoked by balance perturbation must accommodate constraints on limb motion imposed by obstacles and other environmental features. Recent results suggest that the required visuospatial information (VSI) is acquired and stored "proactively", prior to perturbation onset (PO); however, the extent to which "online" (post-PO) visual feedback can contribute is not known. To study this, we used large unpredictable platform perturbations to evoke rapid step reactions, while subjects wore liquid crystal goggles that occluded vision: (1) prior to PO (forcing use of online-VSI), (2) after PO (forcing use of stored-VSI), or (3) not at all (normal-VSI). Subjects stood behind a barrier in which the location of a narrow slot, through which the foot had to be moved during forward step reactions, was varied unpredictably between trials. Within subjects who were able to do the task (6 of 8 young adults tested), responses in stored-VSI and normal-VSI trials were very similar. However, in online-VSI trials, the foot-off time for the step through the slot was delayed (by approximately 50 ms, on average). Presumably, this delay allowed more time to acquire and process online-VSI regarding the required foot trajectory, yet subjects were still more likely to select the "wrong" foot (contralateral to the slot location) and to contact the barrier while moving the foot through the slot, in online-VSI trials. These results suggest a critical role for stored-VSI during the earliest phase of the step, in selecting the step limb and planning the initial trajectory. Online acquisition and processing of the required VSI may be too slow to allow effective control of this early phase, particularly in situations where the demands for accurate foot motion are high.

Mesh:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18771705     DOI: 10.1016/j.neulet.2008.08.062

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Neurosci Lett        ISSN: 0304-3940            Impact factor:   3.046


  5 in total

1.  Reaching to recover balance in unpredictable circumstances: is online visual control of the reach-to-grasp reaction necessary or sufficient?

Authors:  Kenneth C Cheng; Sandra M McKay; Emily C King; Brian E Maki
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2012-03-13       Impact factor: 1.972

Review 2.  Cognitive demands and cortical control of human balance-recovery reactions.

Authors:  B E Maki; W E McIlroy
Journal:  J Neural Transm (Vienna)       Date:  2007-06-08       Impact factor: 3.575

3.  Can we use peripheral vision to create a visuospatial map for compensatory reach-to-grasp reactions?

Authors:  Laura Williams; Veronica Miyasike-daSilva; W Richard Staines; Stephen D Prentice; William E McIlroy
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2022-09-15       Impact factor: 2.064

4.  Perturbation training to promote safe independent mobility post-stroke: study protocol for a randomized controlled trial.

Authors:  Avril Mansfield; Anthony Aqui; Andrew Centen; Cynthia J Danells; Vincent G DePaul; Svetlana Knorr; Alison Schinkel-Ivy; Dina Brooks; Elizabeth L Inness; William E McIlroy; George Mochizuki
Journal:  BMC Neurol       Date:  2015-06-06       Impact factor: 2.474

5.  Do aging and dual-tasking impair the capacity to store and retrieve visuospatial information needed to guide perturbation-evoked reach-to-grasp reactions?

Authors:  Kenneth C Cheng; Jay Pratt; Brian E Maki
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2013-11-05       Impact factor: 3.240

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.