Literature DB >> 12069010

Lexical and talker effects on word recognition among native and non-native listeners with normal and impaired hearing.

Sumiko Takayanagi1, Donald D Dirks, Anahita Moshfegh.   

Abstract

Evidence suggests that word recognition depends on numerous talker-, listener-, and stimulus-related characteristics. The current study examined the effects of talker variability and lexical difficulty on spoken-word recognition among four groups of listeners: native listeners with normal hearing or hearing impairment (moderate sensorineural hearing loss) and non-native listeners with normal hearing or hearing impairment. The ability of listeners to accommodate trial-to-trial variations in talkers' voice was assessed by comparing recognition scores for a single-talker condition to those obtained in a multiple-talker condition. Lexical difficulty was assessed by comparing word-recognition performance between lexically "easy" and "hard" words as determined by frequency of occurrence in language and the structural characteristics of similarity neighborhoods formalized in the Neighborhood Activation Model. An up-down adaptive procedure was used to determine the sound pressure level for 50% performance. Non-native listeners in both normal-hearing and hearing-impaired groups required greater intensity for equal intelligibility than the native normal-hearing and hearing-impaired listeners. Results, however, showed significant effects of talker variability and lexical difficulty for the four groups. Structural equation modeling demonstrated that an audibility factor accounts for 2-3 times more variance in performance than does a linguistic-familiarity factor. However, the linguistic-familiarity factor is also essential to the model fit. The results demonstrated effects of talker variability and lexical difficulty on word recognition for both native and nonnative listeners with normal or impaired hearing. The results indicate that linguistic and indexical factors should be considered in the development of speech-recognition tests.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2002        PMID: 12069010     DOI: 10.1044/1092-4388(2002/047)

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Speech Lang Hear Res        ISSN: 1092-4388            Impact factor:   2.297


  14 in total

1.  Factors influencing recognition of interrupted speech.

Authors:  Xin Wang; Larry E Humes
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2010-10       Impact factor: 1.840

2.  Perceptual contributions to monosyllabic word intelligibility: segmental, lexical, and noise replacement factors.

Authors:  Daniel Fogerty; Larry E Humes
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2010-11       Impact factor: 1.840

3.  Effects of open-set and closed-set task demands on spoken word recognition.

Authors:  Cynthia G Clopper; David B Pisoni; Adam T Tierney
Journal:  J Am Acad Audiol       Date:  2006-05       Impact factor: 1.664

4.  Sensitivity to phonological similarity within and across languages.

Authors:  Viorica Marian; Henrike K Blumenfeld; Olga V Boukrina
Journal:  J Psycholinguist Res       Date:  2008-05

5.  Effects of long-term training on aided speech-recognition performance in noise in older adults.

Authors:  Matthew H Burk; Larry E Humes
Journal:  J Speech Lang Hear Res       Date:  2008-06       Impact factor: 2.297

6.  The Effect of Intensified Language Exposure on Accommodating Talker Variability.

Authors:  Mark Antoniou; Patrick C M Wong; Suiping Wang
Journal:  J Speech Lang Hear Res       Date:  2015-06       Impact factor: 2.297

7.  Age-related neural reorganization during spoken word recognition: the interaction of form and meaning.

Authors:  Meredith Shafto; Billi Randall; Emmanuel A Stamatakis; Paul Wright; L K Tyler
Journal:  J Cogn Neurosci       Date:  2012-03-05       Impact factor: 3.225

8.  Acoustic predictors of intelligibility for segmentally interrupted speech: temporal envelope, voicing, and duration.

Authors:  Daniel Fogerty
Journal:  J Speech Lang Hear Res       Date:  2013-07-09       Impact factor: 2.297

9.  The relative importance of consonant and vowel segments to the recognition of words and sentences: effects of age and hearing loss.

Authors:  Daniel Fogerty; Diane Kewley-Port; Larry E Humes
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2012-09       Impact factor: 1.840

10.  Age-related differences in inhibitory control predict audiovisual speech perception.

Authors:  Avanti Dey; Mitchell S Sommers
Journal:  Psychol Aging       Date:  2015-06-29
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.