Literature DB >> 22352516

Linguistic contributions to speech-on-speech masking for native and non-native listeners: language familiarity and semantic content.

Susanne Brouwer1, Kristin J Van Engen, Lauren Calandruccio, Ann R Bradlow.   

Abstract

This study examined whether speech-on-speech masking is sensitive to variation in the degree of similarity between the target and the masker speech. Three experiments investigated whether speech-in-speech recognition varies across different background speech languages (English vs Dutch) for both English and Dutch targets, as well as across variation in the semantic content of the background speech (meaningful vs semantically anomalous sentences), and across variation in listener status vis-à-vis the target and masker languages (native, non-native, or unfamiliar). The results showed that the more similar the target speech is to the masker speech (e.g., same vs different language, same vs different levels of semantic content), the greater the interference on speech recognition accuracy. Moreover, the listener's knowledge of the target and the background language modulate the size of the release from masking. These factors had an especially strong effect on masking effectiveness in highly unfavorable listening conditions. Overall this research provided evidence that that the degree of target-masker similarity plays a significant role in speech-in-speech recognition. The results also give insight into how listeners assign their resources differently depending on whether they are listening to their first or second language.
© 2012 Acoustical Society of America

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22352516      PMCID: PMC3292614          DOI: 10.1121/1.3675943

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am        ISSN: 0001-4966            Impact factor:   2.482


  26 in total

1.  The interlanguage speech intelligibility benefit.

Authors:  Tessa Bent; Ann R Bradlow
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2003-09       Impact factor: 1.840

2.  Effect of number of masking talkers and auditory priming on informational masking in speech recognition.

Authors:  Richard L Freyman; Uma Balakrishnan; Karen S Helfer
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2004-05       Impact factor: 1.840

3.  Release from informational masking by time reversal of native and non-native interfering speech.

Authors:  Koenraad S Rhebergen; Niek J Versfeld; Wouter A Dreschler
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2005-09       Impact factor: 1.840

4.  Sentence recognition in native- and foreign-language multi-talker background noise.

Authors:  Kristin J Van Engen; Ann R Bradlow
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2007-01       Impact factor: 1.840

5.  Distraction by competing speech in young and older adult listeners.

Authors:  Patricia A Tun; Gail O'Kane; Arthur Wingfield
Journal:  Psychol Aging       Date:  2002-09

6.  Semantic and phonetic enhancements for speech-in-noise recognition by native and non-native listeners.

Authors:  Ann R Bradlow; Jennifer A Alexander
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2007-04       Impact factor: 1.840

7.  Recognizing speech under a processing load: dissociating energetic from informational factors.

Authors:  Sven L Mattys; Joanna Brooks; Martin Cooke
Journal:  Cogn Psychol       Date:  2009-05-06       Impact factor: 3.468

8.  Age of second-language acquisition and perception of speech in noise.

Authors:  L H Mayo; M Florentine; S Buus
Journal:  J Speech Lang Hear Res       Date:  1997-06       Impact factor: 2.297

9.  Perceptual masking in multiple sound backgrounds.

Authors:  R Carhart; T W Tillman; E S Greetis
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  1969-03       Impact factor: 1.840

10.  The effectiveness of clear speech as a masker.

Authors:  Lauren Calandruccio; Kristin Van Engen; Sumitrajit Dhar; Ann R Bradlow
Journal:  J Speech Lang Hear Res       Date:  2010-08-05       Impact factor: 2.297

View more
  48 in total

1.  Linguistically-based informational masking in preschool children.

Authors:  Rochelle S Newman; Giovanna Morini; Faraz Ahsan; Gerald Kidd
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2015-07       Impact factor: 1.840

2.  Development and preliminary evaluation of a pediatric Spanish-English speech perception task.

Authors:  Lauren Calandruccio; Bianca Gomez; Emily Buss; Lori J Leibold
Journal:  Am J Audiol       Date:  2014-06       Impact factor: 1.493

3.  The information-divergence hypothesis of informational masking.

Authors:  Robert A Lutfi; Lynn Gilbertson; Inseok Heo; An-Chieh Chang; Jacob Stamas
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2013-09       Impact factor: 1.840

4.  Perceiving sequential dependencies in auditory streams.

Authors:  Gerald Kidd; Christine R Mason; Timothy Streeter; Eric R Thompson; Virginia Best; Gregory H Wakefield
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2013-08       Impact factor: 1.840

5.  Contextual variability during speech-in-speech recognition.

Authors:  Susanne Brouwer; Ann R Bradlow
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2014-07       Impact factor: 1.840

6.  Working memory training to improve speech perception in noise across languages.

Authors:  Erin M Ingvalson; Sumitrajit Dhar; Patrick C M Wong; Hanjun Liu
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2015-06       Impact factor: 1.840

7.  Enhancing the perceptual segregation and localization of sound sources with a triple beamformer.

Authors:  Gerald Kidd; Todd R Jennings; Andrew J Byrne
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2020-12       Impact factor: 1.840

8.  The Downside of Greater Lexical Influences: Selectively Poorer Speech Perception in Noise.

Authors:  Boji P W Lam; Zilong Xie; Rachel Tessmer; Bharath Chandrasekaran
Journal:  J Speech Lang Hear Res       Date:  2017-06-10       Impact factor: 2.297

9.  Spatially separating language masker from target results in spatial and linguistic masking release.

Authors:  Navin Viswanathan; Kostas Kokkinakis; Brittany T Williams
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2016-12       Impact factor: 1.840

10.  Effects of listener age and native language on perception of accented and unaccented sentences.

Authors:  Rebecca E Bieber; Grace H Yeni-Komshian; Maya S Freund; Peter J Fitzgibbons; Sandra Gordon-Salant
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2018-12       Impact factor: 1.840

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.