Literature DB >> 24993234

Contextual variability during speech-in-speech recognition.

Susanne Brouwer1, Ann R Bradlow1.   

Abstract

This study examined the influence of background language variation on speech recognition. English listeners performed an English sentence recognition task in either "pure" background conditions in which all trials had either English or Dutch background babble or in mixed background conditions in which the background language varied across trials (i.e., a mix of English and Dutch or one of these background languages mixed with quiet trials). This design allowed the authors to compare performance on identical trials across pure and mixed conditions. The data reveal that speech-in-speech recognition is sensitive to contextual variation in terms of the target-background language (mis)match depending on the relative ease/difficulty of the test trials in relation to the surrounding trials.

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 24993234      PMCID: PMC4098068          DOI: 10.1121/1.4881322

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am        ISSN: 0001-4966            Impact factor:   1.840


  8 in total

1.  Within-ear and across-ear interference in a dichotic cocktail party listening task: effects of masker uncertainty.

Authors:  Douglas S Brungart; Brian D Simpson
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2004-01       Impact factor: 1.840

2.  Effect of masker type on native and non-native consonant perception in noise.

Authors:  M L Garcia Lecumberri; Martin Cooke
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2006-04       Impact factor: 1.840

3.  Sentence recognition in native- and foreign-language multi-talker background noise.

Authors:  Kristin J Van Engen; Ann R Bradlow
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2007-01       Impact factor: 1.840

4.  Variability and uncertainty in masking by competing speech.

Authors:  Richard L Freyman; Karen S Helfer; Uma Balakrishnan
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2007-02       Impact factor: 1.840

5.  Role of masker predictability in the cocktail party problem.

Authors:  Gary L Jones; Ruth Y Litovsky
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2008-12       Impact factor: 1.840

6.  Random effects structure for confirmatory hypothesis testing: Keep it maximal.

Authors:  Dale J Barr; Roger Levy; Christoph Scheepers; Harry J Tily
Journal:  J Mem Lang       Date:  2013-04       Impact factor: 3.059

7.  Masking release due to linguistic and phonetic dissimilarity between the target and masker speech.

Authors:  Lauren Calandruccio; Susanne Brouwer; Kristin J Van Engen; Sumitrajit Dhar; Ann R Bradlow
Journal:  Am J Audiol       Date:  2013-06       Impact factor: 1.493

8.  Linguistic contributions to speech-on-speech masking for native and non-native listeners: language familiarity and semantic content.

Authors:  Susanne Brouwer; Kristin J Van Engen; Lauren Calandruccio; Ann R Bradlow
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2012-02       Impact factor: 2.482

  8 in total
  4 in total

1.  Error patterns of native and non-native listeners' perception of speech in noise.

Authors:  Benjamin D Zinszer; Meredith Riggs; Rachel Reetzke; Bharath Chandrasekaran
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2019-02       Impact factor: 1.840

2.  The effects of target-masker sex mismatch on linguistic release from masking.

Authors:  Brittany T Williams; Navin Viswanathan
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2020-10       Impact factor: 1.840

3.  Adaptive plasticity in speech perception: Effects of external information and internal predictions.

Authors:  Sara Guediche; Julie A Fiez; Lori L Holt
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform       Date:  2016-02-08       Impact factor: 3.332

4.  Revisiting the target-masker linguistic similarity hypothesis.

Authors:  Violet A Brown; Naseem H Dillman-Hasso; ZhaoBin Li; Lucia Ray; Ellen Mamantov; Kristin J Van Engen; Julia F Strand
Journal:  Atten Percept Psychophys       Date:  2022-04-26       Impact factor: 2.199

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.