Literature DB >> 28040021

Spatially separating language masker from target results in spatial and linguistic masking release.

Navin Viswanathan1, Kostas Kokkinakis1, Brittany T Williams1.   

Abstract

Several studies demonstrate that in complex auditory scenes, speech recognition is improved when the competing background and target speech differ linguistically. However, such studies typically utilize spatially co-located speech sources which may not fully capture typical listening conditions. Furthermore, co-located presentation may overestimate the observed benefit of linguistic dissimilarity. The current study examines the effect of spatial separation on linguistic release from masking. Results demonstrate that linguistic release from masking does extend to spatially separated sources. The overall magnitude of the observed effect, however, appears to be diminished relative to the co-located presentation conditions.

Year:  2016        PMID: 28040021      PMCID: PMC5392089          DOI: 10.1121/1.4968034

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am        ISSN: 0001-4966            Impact factor:   1.840


  9 in total

1.  Spatial release from informational masking in speech recognition.

Authors:  R L Freyman; U Balakrishnan; K S Helfer
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2001-05       Impact factor: 1.840

2.  Speech-on-speech masking with variable access to the linguistic content of the masker speech.

Authors:  Lauren Calandruccio; Sumitrajit Dhar; Ann R Bradlow
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2010-08       Impact factor: 1.840

3.  Sentence recognition in native- and foreign-language multi-talker background noise.

Authors:  Kristin J Van Engen; Ann R Bradlow
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2007-01       Impact factor: 1.840

4.  The foreign language cocktail party problem: Energetic and informational masking effects in non-native speech perception.

Authors:  Martin Cooke; M L Garcia Lecumberri; Jon Barker
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2008-01       Impact factor: 1.840

5.  Recognizing speech under a processing load: dissociating energetic from informational factors.

Authors:  Sven L Mattys; Joanna Brooks; Martin Cooke
Journal:  Cogn Psychol       Date:  2009-05-06       Impact factor: 3.468

6.  Masking release due to linguistic and phonetic dissimilarity between the target and masker speech.

Authors:  Lauren Calandruccio; Susanne Brouwer; Kristin J Van Engen; Sumitrajit Dhar; Ann R Bradlow
Journal:  Am J Audiol       Date:  2013-06       Impact factor: 1.493

7.  The BKB (Bamford-Kowal-Bench) sentence lists for partially-hearing children.

Authors:  J Bench; A Kowal; J Bamford
Journal:  Br J Audiol       Date:  1979-08

8.  Linguistic Masking Release in School-Age Children and Adults.

Authors:  Lauren Calandruccio; Lori J Leibold; Emily Buss
Journal:  Am J Audiol       Date:  2016-03       Impact factor: 1.493

9.  Linguistic contributions to speech-on-speech masking for native and non-native listeners: language familiarity and semantic content.

Authors:  Susanne Brouwer; Kristin J Van Engen; Lauren Calandruccio; Ann R Bradlow
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2012-02       Impact factor: 2.482

  9 in total
  5 in total

1.  The effects of target-masker sex mismatch on linguistic release from masking.

Authors:  Brittany T Williams; Navin Viswanathan
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2020-10       Impact factor: 1.840

2.  Listeners Experience Linguistic Masking Release in Noise-Vocoded Speech-in-Speech Recognition.

Authors:  Navin Viswanathan; Kostas Kokkinakis; Brittany T Williams
Journal:  J Speech Lang Hear Res       Date:  2018-02-15       Impact factor: 2.297

3.  Revisiting the target-masker linguistic similarity hypothesis.

Authors:  Violet A Brown; Naseem H Dillman-Hasso; ZhaoBin Li; Lucia Ray; Ellen Mamantov; Kristin J Van Engen; Julia F Strand
Journal:  Atten Percept Psychophys       Date:  2022-04-26       Impact factor: 2.199

Review 4.  Working-Memory, Alpha-Theta Oscillations and Musical Training in Older Age: Research Perspectives for Speech-on-speech Perception.

Authors:  Ryan Gray; Anastasios Sarampalis; Deniz Başkent; Eleanor E Harding
Journal:  Front Aging Neurosci       Date:  2022-05-11       Impact factor: 5.702

5.  Bringing the Nonlinearity of the Movement System to Gestural Theories of Language Use: Multifractal Structure of Spoken English Supports the Compensation for Coarticulation in Human Speech Perception.

Authors:  Rachel M Ward; Damian G Kelty-Stephen
Journal:  Front Physiol       Date:  2018-09-03       Impact factor: 4.566

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.