Literature DB >> 16240788

Release from informational masking by time reversal of native and non-native interfering speech.

Koenraad S Rhebergen1, Niek J Versfeld, Wouter A Dreschler.   

Abstract

In many studies, the influence of intelligibility of the interfering speech is avoided by reversing it in time. Usually, intelligibility with time-reversed interfering speech indeed is higher compared to that with normal interfering speech. However, due to the nature of speech, reversed speech also gives rise to increased forward masking. The latter will result in a decrease in intelligibility. Thus, differences in intelligibility as a consequence of reversing speech in time are due to two opposite effects. This paper describes a speech reception threshold (SRT) test with intelligible and unintelligible interfering speech played normally and time-reversed. With Dutch listeners, Swedish reversed interfering speech gave a rise in SRT of 2.3 dB compared with the Swedish interfering speech (played normally). The difference can be attributed to differences in forward masking. Dutch time-reversed interfering speech gave a decrease in SRT of 4.3 dB compared to (intelligible) Dutch interfering speech. The latter is the result of both a release from informational masking and an increase in forward masking. Therefore, the amount of informational masking is larger than 4.3 dB and, if one assumes similar differences in forward masking for Dutch and Swedish speech, may amount to 6.6 dB.

Mesh:

Year:  2005        PMID: 16240788     DOI: 10.1121/1.2000751

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am        ISSN: 0001-4966            Impact factor:   1.840


  34 in total

1.  Relative contribution of target and masker temporal fine structure to the unmasking of consonants in noise.

Authors:  Frédéric Apoux; Eric W Healy
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2011-12       Impact factor: 1.840

2.  Masker location uncertainty reveals evidence for suppression of maskers in two-talker contexts.

Authors:  Kachina Allen; David Alais; Barbara Shinn-Cunningham; Simon Carlile
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2011-10       Impact factor: 1.840

3.  Stimulus factors influencing spatial release from speech-on-speech masking.

Authors:  Gerald Kidd; Christine R Mason; Virginia Best; Nicole Marrone
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2010-10       Impact factor: 1.840

4.  Relative contribution of off- and on-frequency spectral components of background noise to the masking of unprocessed and vocoded speech.

Authors:  Frédéric Apoux; Eric W Healy
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2010-10       Impact factor: 1.840

5.  Linguistically-based informational masking in preschool children.

Authors:  Rochelle S Newman; Giovanna Morini; Faraz Ahsan; Gerald Kidd
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2015-07       Impact factor: 1.840

6.  Sentence recognition in native- and foreign-language multi-talker background noise.

Authors:  Kristin J Van Engen; Ann R Bradlow
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2007-01       Impact factor: 1.840

7.  Listening to speech in the presence of other sounds.

Authors:  C J Darwin
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  2008-03-12       Impact factor: 6.237

8.  Tuning in the spatial dimension: evidence from a masked speech identification task.

Authors:  Nicole Marrone; Christine R Mason; Gerald Kidd
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2008-08       Impact factor: 1.840

9.  Speech detection in spatial and nonspatial speech maskers.

Authors:  Uma Balakrishnan; Richard L Freyman
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2008-05       Impact factor: 1.840

10.  Masking release for low- and high-pass-filtered speech in the presence of noise and single-talker interference.

Authors:  Andrew J Oxenham; Andrea M Simonson
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2009-01       Impact factor: 1.840

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.