Literature DB >> 1918628

Performance of hearing-impaired persons on auditory enhancement tasks.

L M Thibodeau1.   

Abstract

An auditory enhancement effect was evaluated in normal and hearing-impaired persons using a paradigm similar to that used by Viemeister and Bacon [J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 71, 1502-1507 (1982)]. Thresholds for a 2000-Hz probe were obtained in two forward-masking conditions: (1) the standard condition in which the masker was a four-component harmonic complex including 2000 Hz, and (2) the enhancing condition in which the same harmonic complex except for the exclusion of the 2000-Hz component preceded the four-component masker. In addition, enhancement for speech was evaluated by asking subjects to identify flat-spectrum harmonic complexes that were preceded by inverse vowel spectra. Finally, suppression effects were evaluated by measuring forward-masked thresholds for a 2000-Hz probe as a function of suppressor frequency added to a 2000-Hz masker. Across all subjects, there was evidence of enhancement and better vowel recognition in those persons who also demonstrated evidence of suppression; however, two of the normal-hearing persons demonstrated reduced enhancement yet normal suppression effects.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1991        PMID: 1918628     DOI: 10.1121/1.400722

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am        ISSN: 0001-4966            Impact factor:   1.840


  14 in total

1.  Contextual effects in the identification of nonspeech auditory patterns.

Authors:  Gerald Kidd; Virginia M Richards; Timothy Streeter; Christine R Mason; Rong Huang
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2011-12       Impact factor: 1.840

2.  Evidence of the enhancement effect in electrical stimulation via electrode matching (L).

Authors:  Matthew J Goupell; Mitchell J Mostardi
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2012-02       Impact factor: 1.840

3.  Effects of auditory enhancement on the loudness of masker and target components.

Authors:  Ningyuan Wang; Andrew J Oxenham
Journal:  Hear Res       Date:  2016-01-22       Impact factor: 3.208

4.  The enhancement effect: evidence for adaptation of inhibition using a binaural centering task.

Authors:  Andrew J Byrne; Mark A Stellmack; Neal F Viemeister
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2011-04       Impact factor: 1.840

5.  Stimulus Frequency Otoacoustic Emissions Provide No Evidence for the Role of Efferents in the Enhancement Effect.

Authors:  Jordan A Beim; Maxwell Elliott; Andrew J Oxenham; Magdalena Wojtczak
Journal:  J Assoc Res Otolaryngol       Date:  2015-07-08

6.  Auditory Enhancement in Cochlear-Implant Users Under Simultaneous and Forward Masking.

Authors:  Heather A Kreft; Andrew J Oxenham
Journal:  J Assoc Res Otolaryngol       Date:  2017-03-16

7.  The effects of preceding sound and stimulus duration on measures of suppression in younger and older adults.

Authors:  Erica L Hegland; Elizabeth A Strickland
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2018-12       Impact factor: 1.840

8.  Auditory enhancement under forward masking in normal-hearing and hearing-impaired listeners.

Authors:  Heather A Kreft; Andrew J Oxenham
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2019-11       Impact factor: 1.840

9.  Auditory enhancement under simultaneous masking in normal-hearing and hearing-impaired listeners.

Authors:  Heather A Kreft; Magdalena Wojtczak; Andrew J Oxenham
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2018-02       Impact factor: 1.840

10.  New perspectives on the measurement and time course of auditory enhancement.

Authors:  Lei Feng; Andrew J Oxenham
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform       Date:  2015-08-17       Impact factor: 3.332

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.