Literature DB >> 25605546

Are Australasian Genetic Counselors Interested in Private Practice at the Primary Care Level of Health Service?

Vrunda Sane1, Linda Humphreys2, Madelyn Peterson3.   

Abstract

This study explored the perceived interest in development of private genetic counseling services in collaboration with primary care physicians in the Australasian setting by online survey of members of the Australasian Society of Genetic Counselors. Four hypothetical private practice models of professional collaboration between genetic counselors and primary care physicians or clinical geneticists were proposed to gauge interest and enthusiasm of ASGC members for this type of professional development. Perceived barriers and facilitators were also evaluated. 78 completed responses were included for analysis. The majority of participants (84.6 %) showed a positive degree of interest and enthusiasm towards potential for clinical work in private practice. All proposed practice models yielded a positive degree of interest from participants. Model 4 (the only model of collaboration with a clinical geneticist rather than primary care physician) was the clearly preferred option (mean = 4.26/5), followed by Model 2 (collaboration with a single primary care practice) (mean = 4.09/5), Model 3 (collaboration with multiple primary care clinics, multidisciplinary clinic or specialty clinic) (mean = 3.77/5) and finally, Model 1 (mean = 3.61/5), which was the most independent model of practice. When participants ranked the options in the order of preference, Model 4 remained the most popular first preference (44.6 %), followed by model 2 (21.6 %), model 3 (18.9 %) and model 1 was again least popular (10.8 %). There was no significant statistical correlation between demographic characteristics (age bracket, years of work experience, current level of work autonomy) and participants' preference for private practice models. Support from clinical genetics colleagues and the professional society was highly rated as a facilitator and, conversely, lack of such support as a significant barrier.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Family history; Genomic medicine; Primary care; Private practice; Professional development; Professional practice; Risk assessment

Mesh:

Year:  2015        PMID: 25605546     DOI: 10.1007/s10897-014-9809-1

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Genet Couns        ISSN: 1059-7700            Impact factor:   2.537


  25 in total

Review 1.  Reconsidering the family history in primary care.

Authors:  Eugene C Rich; Wylie Burke; Caryl J Heaton; Susanne Haga; Linda Pinsky; M Priscilla Short; Louise Acheson
Journal:  J Gen Intern Med       Date:  2004-03       Impact factor: 5.128

2.  The prospect of genome-guided preventive medicine: a need and opportunity for genetic counselors.

Authors:  Julianne M O'Daniel
Journal:  J Genet Couns       Date:  2010-05-04       Impact factor: 2.537

Review 3.  Genetics and genomics in general practice.

Authors:  Siaw-Teng Liaw
Journal:  Aust Fam Physician       Date:  2010-09

4.  When you care enough to do your very best: genetic counselor experiences of compassion fatigue.

Authors:  Lacey G Benoit; Patricia McCarthy Veach; Bonnie S LeRoy
Journal:  J Genet Couns       Date:  2007-02-23       Impact factor: 2.537

5.  A comparative analysis of ethical and professional challenges experienced by Australian and U.S. genetic counselors.

Authors:  Sarah Alliman; Patricia McCarthy Veach; Dianne M Bartels; Fengqin Lian; Carolyn James; Bonnie S LeRoy
Journal:  J Genet Couns       Date:  2009-05-19       Impact factor: 2.537

6.  Identifying outcomes of clinical genetic services: qualitative evidence and methodological considerations.

Authors:  Christalla Pithara
Journal:  J Genet Couns       Date:  2013-09-14       Impact factor: 2.537

Review 7.  Genomics, health care, and society.

Authors:  Kathy L Hudson
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2011-09-15       Impact factor: 91.245

8.  The value of a genetic counselor: improving identification of cancer genetic counseling patients with chart review.

Authors:  Jennifer N Eichmeyer; Christa Burnham; Patty Sproat; Rick Tivis; Thomas M Beck
Journal:  J Genet Couns       Date:  2013-10-25       Impact factor: 2.537

Review 9.  Genetic counseling in primary care: longitudinal, psychosocial issues in genetic diagnosis and counseling.

Authors:  Jeffrey R Martin; Adam S Wilikofsky
Journal:  Prim Care       Date:  2004-09       Impact factor: 2.907

10.  Identifying future models for delivering genetic services: a nominal group study in primary care.

Authors:  Glyn Elwyn; Adrian Edwards; Rachel Iredale; Peter Davies; Jonathon Gray
Journal:  BMC Fam Pract       Date:  2005-04-14       Impact factor: 2.497

View more
  3 in total

1.  Genetic Counsellors and Private Practice: Professional Turbulence and Common Values.

Authors:  Sarah Collis; Clara Gaff; Samantha Wake; Alison McEwen
Journal:  J Genet Couns       Date:  2017-12-27       Impact factor: 2.537

2.  Pitfalls and challenges in genetic test interpretation: An exploration of genetic professionals experience with interpretation of results.

Authors:  Katherine E Donohue; Catherine Gooch; Alexander Katz; Jessica Wakelee; Anne Slavotinek; Bruce R Korf
Journal:  Clin Genet       Date:  2021-05       Impact factor: 4.296

3.  Patient Satisfaction with Private Genetic Counselling for Familial Cancer in Western Australia: A Prospective Audit.

Authors:  Charmi N Perera; Sarah O'Sullivan; Nicholas Pachter; Jason Jit-Sun Tan; Paul A Cohen
Journal:  Asian Pac J Cancer Prev       Date:  2021-10-01
  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.