Mary de Groot1, Jennifer Wessel1,2. 1. School of Medicine, Indiana University, Indianapolis, IN, USA (Dr de Groot, Dr Wessel). 2. Fairbanks School of Public Health, Indiana University, Indianapolis, IN, USA (Dr Wessel).
Abstract
PURPOSE: The purpose of this study was to examine the motivational, attitudinal, and behavioral predictors of interest in genetic testing (GT) in those with and without awareness of their risk for type 2 diabetes (T2DM). METHODS: A convenience sample of adults visiting emergency departments, libraries, or an online research registry was surveyed. Responses from adults without diabetes who reported 1 or more risk factors for T2DM (eg, family history, body mass index > 25) were included in the analyses (n = 265). RESULTS: Participants were 37 ± 11 years old, white (54%), and female (69%), with some college education (53%) and an annual income below $25 000 (44%). Approximately half (52%) expressed interest in GT for T2DM. Individuals were stratified by perceived risk for T2DM (risk aware or risk unaware). Among the risk aware, younger age (P < .04) predicted greater interest in GT. Among the risk unaware, family history of T2DM (P < .008) and preference to know genetic risk (P < .0002) predicted interest in GT. Both groups identified the need for low-cost GT. CONCLUSIONS: GT is an increasingly available and accurate tool to predict T2DM risk for patients. In this sample, GT was a salient tool for those with and without awareness of their T2DM risk. Financial accessibility is critical to use of this tool for both groups.
PURPOSE: The purpose of this study was to examine the motivational, attitudinal, and behavioral predictors of interest in genetic testing (GT) in those with and without awareness of their risk for type 2 diabetes (T2DM). METHODS: A convenience sample of adults visiting emergency departments, libraries, or an online research registry was surveyed. Responses from adults without diabetes who reported 1 or more risk factors for T2DM (eg, family history, body mass index > 25) were included in the analyses (n = 265). RESULTS:Participants were 37 ± 11 years old, white (54%), and female (69%), with some college education (53%) and an annual income below $25 000 (44%). Approximately half (52%) expressed interest in GT for T2DM. Individuals were stratified by perceived risk for T2DM (risk aware or risk unaware). Among the risk aware, younger age (P < .04) predicted greater interest in GT. Among the risk unaware, family history of T2DM (P < .008) and preference to know genetic risk (P < .0002) predicted interest in GT. Both groups identified the need for low-cost GT. CONCLUSIONS: GT is an increasingly available and accurate tool to predict T2DM risk for patients. In this sample, GT was a salient tool for those with and without awareness of their T2DM risk. Financial accessibility is critical to use of this tool for both groups.
Authors: Struan F A Grant; Gudmar Thorleifsson; Inga Reynisdottir; Rafn Benediktsson; Andrei Manolescu; Jesus Sainz; Agnar Helgason; Hreinn Stefansson; Valur Emilsson; Anna Helgadottir; Unnur Styrkarsdottir; Kristinn P Magnusson; G Bragi Walters; Ebba Palsdottir; Thorbjorg Jonsdottir; Thorunn Gudmundsdottir; Arnaldur Gylfason; Jona Saemundsdottir; Robert L Wilensky; Muredach P Reilly; Daniel J Rader; Yu Bagger; Claus Christiansen; Vilmundur Gudnason; Gunnar Sigurdsson; Unnur Thorsteinsdottir; Jeffrey R Gulcher; Augustine Kong; Kari Stefansson Journal: Nat Genet Date: 2006-01-15 Impact factor: 38.330
Authors: Inga Reynisdottir; Gudmar Thorleifsson; Rafn Benediktsson; Gunnar Sigurdsson; Valur Emilsson; Anna Sigurlin Einarsdottir; Eyrun Edda Hjorleifsdottir; Gudbjorg Th Orlygsdottir; Gudrun Thora Bjornsdottir; Jona Saemundsdottir; Skarphedinn Halldorsson; Soffia Hrafnkelsdottir; Steinunn Bjorg Sigurjonsdottir; Svana Steinsdottir; Mitchell Martin; Jarema P Kochan; Brian K Rhees; Struan F A Grant; Michael L Frigge; Augustine Kong; Vilmundur Gudnason; Kari Stefansson; Jeffrey R Gulcher Journal: Am J Hum Genet Date: 2003-07-08 Impact factor: 11.025
Authors: Richa Saxena; Benjamin F Voight; Valeriya Lyssenko; Noël P Burtt; Paul I W de Bakker; Hong Chen; Jeffrey J Roix; Sekar Kathiresan; Joel N Hirschhorn; Mark J Daly; Thomas E Hughes; Leif Groop; David Altshuler; Peter Almgren; Jose C Florez; Joanne Meyer; Kristin Ardlie; Kristina Bengtsson Boström; Bo Isomaa; Guillaume Lettre; Ulf Lindblad; Helen N Lyon; Olle Melander; Christopher Newton-Cheh; Peter Nilsson; Marju Orho-Melander; Lennart Råstam; Elizabeth K Speliotes; Marja-Riitta Taskinen; Tiinamaija Tuomi; Candace Guiducci; Anna Berglund; Joyce Carlson; Lauren Gianniny; Rachel Hackett; Liselotte Hall; Johan Holmkvist; Esa Laurila; Marketa Sjögren; Maria Sterner; Aarti Surti; Margareta Svensson; Malin Svensson; Ryan Tewhey; Brendan Blumenstiel; Melissa Parkin; Matthew Defelice; Rachel Barry; Wendy Brodeur; Jody Camarata; Nancy Chia; Mary Fava; John Gibbons; Bob Handsaker; Claire Healy; Kieu Nguyen; Casey Gates; Carrie Sougnez; Diane Gage; Marcia Nizzari; Stacey B Gabriel; Gung-Wei Chirn; Qicheng Ma; Hemang Parikh; Delwood Richardson; Darrell Ricke; Shaun Purcell Journal: Science Date: 2007-04-26 Impact factor: 47.728
Authors: Daniel W Belsky; Terrie E Moffitt; Renate Houts; Gary G Bennett; Andrea K Biddle; James A Blumenthal; James P Evans; Honalee Harrington; Karen Sugden; Benjamin Williams; Richie Poulton; Avshalom Caspi Journal: Arch Pediatr Adolesc Med Date: 2012-06-01
Authors: Philippa J Talmud; Aroon D Hingorani; Jackie A Cooper; Michael G Marmot; Eric J Brunner; Meena Kumari; Mika Kivimäki; Steve E Humphries Journal: BMJ Date: 2010-01-14
Authors: Eleftheria Zeggini; Michael N Weedon; Cecilia M Lindgren; Timothy M Frayling; Katherine S Elliott; Hana Lango; Nicholas J Timpson; John R B Perry; Nigel W Rayner; Rachel M Freathy; Jeffrey C Barrett; Beverley Shields; Andrew P Morris; Sian Ellard; Christopher J Groves; Lorna W Harries; Jonathan L Marchini; Katharine R Owen; Beatrice Knight; Lon R Cardon; Mark Walker; Graham A Hitman; Andrew D Morris; Alex S F Doney; Mark I McCarthy; Andrew T Hattersley Journal: Science Date: 2007-04-26 Impact factor: 47.728