Literature DB >> 17968638

How risk is perceived, constructed and interpreted by clients in clinical genetics, and the effects on decision making: systematic review.

Stephanie Sivell1, Glyn Elwyn, Clara L Gaff, Angus J Clarke, Rachel Iredale, Chris Shaw, Joanna Dundon, Hazel Thornton, Adrian Edwards.   

Abstract

As an individual's understanding of their genetic risk may influence risk management decisions, it is important to understand the ways in which risk is constructed and interpreted. We systematically reviewed the literature, undertaking a narrative synthesis of 59 studies presenting data on the ways in which individuals perceive, construct and interpret their risk, and the subsequent effects. While most studies assessed perceived risk quantitatively, the combined evidence suggests individuals find risk difficult to accurately quantify, with a tendency to overestimate. Rather than being a stand-alone concept, risk is something lived and experienced and the process of constructing risk is complex and influenced by many factors. While evidence of the effects of perceived risk is limited and inconsistent, there is some evidence to suggest high risk estimations may adversely affect health and lead to inappropriate uptake of medical surveillance and preventative measures by some individuals. A more focused approach to research is needed with greater exploration of the ways in which risk is constructed, along with the development of stronger theoretical models, to facilitate effective and patient-centered counseling strategies.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2007        PMID: 17968638     DOI: 10.1007/s10897-007-9132-1

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Genet Couns        ISSN: 1059-7700            Impact factor:   2.537


  99 in total

1.  A new definition of Genetic Counseling: National Society of Genetic Counselors' Task Force report.

Authors:  Robert Resta; Barbara Bowles Biesecker; Robin L Bennett; Sandra Blum; Susan Estabrooks Hahn; Michelle N Strecker; Janet L Williams
Journal:  J Genet Couns       Date:  2006-04       Impact factor: 2.537

2.  Psychological support needs for women at high genetic risk of breast cancer: some preliminary indicators.

Authors:  P Hopwood; F Keeling; A Long; C Pool; G Evans; A Howell
Journal:  Psychooncology       Date:  1998 Sep-Oct       Impact factor: 3.894

3.  Family history of breast cancer: what do women understand and recall about their genetic risk?

Authors:  M Watson; V Duvivier; M Wade Walsh; S Ashley; J Davidson; M Papaikonomou; V Murday; N Sacks; R Eeles
Journal:  J Med Genet       Date:  1998-09       Impact factor: 6.318

4.  Perceptions of family history across common diseases: a qualitative study in primary care.

Authors:  Fiona M Walter; Jon Emery
Journal:  Fam Pract       Date:  2006-04-11       Impact factor: 2.267

5.  BRCA1/2 testing in hereditary breast and ovarian cancer families II: impact on relationships.

Authors:  Aideen McInerney-Leo; Barbara Bowles Biesecker; Donald W Hadley; Ronald G Kase; Therese R Giambarresi; Elizabeth Johnson; Caryn Lerman; Jeffery P Struewing
Journal:  Am J Med Genet A       Date:  2005-03-01       Impact factor: 2.802

6.  Feeling at risk: how women interpret their familial breast cancer risk.

Authors:  Sandra van Dijk; Wilma Otten; Christi J van Asperen; Danielle R M Timmermans; Aad Tibben; Moniek W Zoeteweij; Sylvia Silberg; Martijn H Breuning; Job Kievit
Journal:  Am J Med Genet A       Date:  2004-11-15       Impact factor: 2.802

Review 7.  Psychological impact of genetic counseling for familial cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Dejana Braithwaite; Jon Emery; Fiona Walter; A Toby Prevost; Stephen Sutton
Journal:  J Natl Cancer Inst       Date:  2004-01-21       Impact factor: 13.506

8.  We are talking, but are they listening? Communication patterns in families with a history of breast/ovarian cancer (HBOC).

Authors:  Regina Kenen; Audrey Arden-Jones; Rosalind Eeles
Journal:  Psychooncology       Date:  2004-05       Impact factor: 3.894

9.  Mammography behavior after receiving a negative BRCA1 mutation test result in the Ashkenazim: a community-based study.

Authors:  S E Plon; L E Peterson; L C Friedman; C S Richards
Journal:  Genet Med       Date:  2000 Nov-Dec       Impact factor: 8.822

10.  A randomized trial of specialist genetic assessment: psychological impact on women at different levels of familial breast cancer risk.

Authors:  K Brain; P Norman; J Gray; C Rogers; R Mansel; P Harper
Journal:  Br J Cancer       Date:  2002-01-21       Impact factor: 7.640

View more
  57 in total

1.  Genetics Health Professionals' Views on Quality of Genetic Counseling Service Provision for Presymptomatic Testing in Late-Onset Neurological Diseases in Portugal: Core Components, Specific Challenges and the Need for Assessment Tools.

Authors:  M Paneque; Á Mendes; L Guimarães; J Sequeiros; H Skirton
Journal:  J Genet Couns       Date:  2014-11-04       Impact factor: 2.537

2.  Direct-to-Consumer genetic testing: what are we talking about?

Authors:  Meredith Weaver; Toni I Pollin
Journal:  J Genet Couns       Date:  2012-03-10       Impact factor: 2.537

3.  Information related to prenatal genetic counseling: interpretation by adolescents, effects on risk perception and ethical implications.

Authors:  Philippe A Melas; Susanne Georgsson Öhman; Niklas Juth; The-Hung Bui
Journal:  J Genet Couns       Date:  2011-10-25       Impact factor: 2.537

Review 4.  Re-conceptualizing risk in genetic counseling: implications for clinical practice.

Authors:  Jehannine C Austin
Journal:  J Genet Couns       Date:  2010-01-30       Impact factor: 2.537

5.  Genetic counseling as a tool for type 2 diabetes prevention: a genetic counseling framework for common polygenetic disorders.

Authors:  Jessica L Waxler; Kelsey E O'Brien; Linda M Delahanty; James B Meigs; Jose C Florez; Elyse R Park; Barbara R Pober; Richard W Grant
Journal:  J Genet Couns       Date:  2012-10       Impact factor: 2.537

6.  Risky business: risk perception and the use of medical services among customers of DTC personal genetic testing.

Authors:  David J Kaufman; Juli M Bollinger; Rachel L Dvoskin; Joan A Scott
Journal:  J Genet Couns       Date:  2012-01-26       Impact factor: 2.537

7.  Balancing life with an increased risk of cancer: lived experiences in healthy individuals with Lynch syndrome.

Authors:  Helle Vendel Petersen; Mef Nilbert; Inge Bernstein; Christina Carlsson
Journal:  J Genet Couns       Date:  2014-01-08       Impact factor: 2.537

8.  Views of Low-Income Women of Color at Increased Risk for Breast Cancer.

Authors:  Emily E Anderson; Silvia Tejada; Richard B Warnecke; Kent Hoskins
Journal:  Narrat Inq Bioeth       Date:  2018

9.  Perceived risk following melanoma genetic testing: a 2-year prospective study distinguishing subjective estimates from recall.

Authors:  Lisa G Aspinwall; Jennifer M Taber; Wendy Kohlmann; Samantha L Leaf; Sancy A Leachman
Journal:  J Genet Couns       Date:  2013-12-10       Impact factor: 2.537

10.  Making sense of genetic uncertainty: the role of religion and spirituality.

Authors:  Mary T White
Journal:  Am J Med Genet C Semin Med Genet       Date:  2009-02-15       Impact factor: 3.908

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.