Literature DB >> 20119700

Re-conceptualizing risk in genetic counseling: implications for clinical practice.

Jehannine C Austin1.   

Abstract

Risk communication is an important component of genetic counseling. However, many authors have noted that after genetic counseling, subjective risk frequently does not match the objective risk provided by the counselor. This inevitably leads to the conclusion that the risk communication process was not "effective". There has been much discussion about how this problem can be better addressed, such that our clients recall numeric risks more accurately after genetic counseling. This article draws on the risk and probability literature from other fields (including psychology, economics, philosophy and climate change) to deconstruct the concepts of "risk" and risk perception to attempt to expand upon and develop thought and discussion about and investigation of the risk communication process in genetic counseling.

Mesh:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20119700      PMCID: PMC3706327          DOI: 10.1007/s10897-010-9279-z

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Genet Couns        ISSN: 1059-7700            Impact factor:   2.537


  17 in total

1.  The interpretation of "likely" depends on the context, but "70%" is 70%--right? The influence of associative processes on perceived certainty.

Authors:  P D Windschitl; E U Weber
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn       Date:  1999-11       Impact factor: 3.051

Review 2.  Defining and redefining the scope and goals of genetic counseling.

Authors:  Robert G Resta
Journal:  Am J Med Genet C Semin Med Genet       Date:  2006-11-15       Impact factor: 3.908

Review 3.  How risk is perceived, constructed and interpreted by clients in clinical genetics, and the effects on decision making: systematic review.

Authors:  Stephanie Sivell; Glyn Elwyn; Clara L Gaff; Angus J Clarke; Rachel Iredale; Chris Shaw; Joanna Dundon; Hazel Thornton; Adrian Edwards
Journal:  J Genet Couns       Date:  2007-10-30       Impact factor: 2.537

Review 4.  Information processing in the context of genetic risk: implications for genetic-risk communication.

Authors:  Holly Etchegary; Colin Perrier
Journal:  J Genet Couns       Date:  2007-05-01       Impact factor: 2.537

Review 5.  Perceiving others' perceptions of risk: still a task for Sisyphus.

Authors:  Adam M Finkel
Journal:  Ann N Y Acad Sci       Date:  2008-04       Impact factor: 5.691

6.  Effect of framing on the perception of genetic recurrence risks.

Authors:  S Shiloh; M Sagi
Journal:  Am J Med Genet       Date:  1989-05

Review 7.  Personalised risk communication for informed decision making about taking screening tests.

Authors:  A G K Edwards; R Evans; J Dundon; S Haigh; K Hood; G J Elwyn
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2006-10-18

8.  Perceptions of family history across common diseases: a qualitative study in primary care.

Authors:  Fiona M Walter; Jon Emery
Journal:  Fam Pract       Date:  2006-04-11       Impact factor: 2.267

Review 9.  Primer: Demystifying risk--understanding and communicating medical risks.

Authors:  Cynthia S Crowson; Terry M Therneau; Eric L Matteson; Sherine E Gabriel
Journal:  Nat Clin Pract Rheumatol       Date:  2007-03

Review 10.  Anchoring-and-adjustment bias in communication of disease risk.

Authors:  Ibrahim Senay; Kimberly A Kaphingst
Journal:  Med Decis Making       Date:  2009-03-11       Impact factor: 2.583

View more
  22 in total

1.  Genetic counseling as a tool for type 2 diabetes prevention: a genetic counseling framework for common polygenetic disorders.

Authors:  Jessica L Waxler; Kelsey E O'Brien; Linda M Delahanty; James B Meigs; Jose C Florez; Elyse R Park; Barbara R Pober; Richard W Grant
Journal:  J Genet Couns       Date:  2012-10       Impact factor: 2.537

2.  Translation and Adaptation of the Genetic Counselling Outcome Scale (GCOS-24) for Use in Denmark.

Authors:  Birgitte Rode Diness; Gritt Overbeck; Tina Duelund Hjortshøj; Trine Bjørg Hammer; Susanne Timshel; Else Sørensen; Marion McAllister
Journal:  J Genet Couns       Date:  2017-03-06       Impact factor: 2.537

3.  Preferences regarding targeted education and risk assessment in people with a family history of major depressive disorder.

Authors:  Veronica Quinn; Bettina Meiser; Alex Wilde; Zoe Cousins; Kristine Barlow-Stewart; Philip B Mitchell; Peter R Schofield
Journal:  J Genet Couns       Date:  2014-01-10       Impact factor: 2.537

4.  Psychosocial aspects of predictive genetic testing for acute intermittent porphyria in norwegian minors.

Authors:  Janice Andersen; Sverre Sandberg; Maalfrid Raaheim; Eva Gjengedal
Journal:  JIMD Rep       Date:  2011-06-22

5.  Descriptive and numeric estimation of risk for psychotic disorders among affected individuals and relatives: implications for clinical practice.

Authors:  Jehannine C Austin; Catriona Hippman; William G Honer
Journal:  Psychiatry Res       Date:  2012-03-14       Impact factor: 3.222

6.  SI RLTD: Risk Scores and Decision Making: The Anatomy of a Decision to Reduce Breast Cancer Risk.

Authors:  Christine Holmberg; Mary Daly; Worta McCaskill-Stevens
Journal:  J Nurs Healthc Chronic Illn       Date:  2010-12

7.  Evaluating genetic counseling for family members of individuals with schizophrenia in the molecular age.

Authors:  Gregory Costain; Mary Jane Esplen; Brenda Toner; Kathleen A Hodgkinson; Anne S Bassett
Journal:  Schizophr Bull       Date:  2012-10-27       Impact factor: 9.306

8.  A focus group study on breast cancer risk presentation: one format does not fit all.

Authors:  Michel Dorval; Karine Bouchard; Jocelyne Chiquette; Gord Glendon; Christine M Maugard; Wilhelm Dubuisson; Seema Panchal; Jacques Simard
Journal:  Eur J Hum Genet       Date:  2012-11-21       Impact factor: 4.246

9.  Ethical issues of genetic susceptibility testing for occupational diseases: opinions of trainees in a high-risk job.

Authors:  M J Visser; M D F Rhebergen; S Kezic; F J H van Dijk; D L Willems; M M Verberk
Journal:  Int Arch Occup Environ Health       Date:  2012-09-25       Impact factor: 3.015

Review 10.  Predispositions to Lymphoma: A Practical Review for Genetic Counselors.

Authors:  Morgan Similuk; V Koneti Rao; Jane Churpek; Michael Lenardo
Journal:  J Genet Couns       Date:  2016-06-06       Impact factor: 2.537

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.