Literature DB >> 22302372

Ab initio protein modeling into CryoEM density maps using EM-Fold.

Steffen Lindert1, Tommy Hofmann, Nils Wötzel, Mert Karakaş, Phoebe L Stewart, Jens Meiler.   

Abstract

EM-Fold was used to build models for nine proteins in the maps of GroEL (7.7 Å resolution) and ribosome (6.4 Å resolution) in the ab initio modeling category of the 2010 cryo-electron microscopy modeling challenge. EM-Fold assembles predicted secondary structure elements (SSEs) into regions of the density map that were identified to correspond to either α-helices or β-strands. The assembly uses a Monte Carlo algorithm where loop closure, density-SSE length agreement, and strength of connecting density between SSEs are evaluated. Top-scoring models are refined by translating, rotating, and bending SSEs to yield better agreement with the density map. EM-Fold produces models that contain backbone atoms within SSEs only. The RMSD values of the models with respect to native range from 2.4 to 3.5 Å for six of the nine proteins. EM-Fold failed to predict the correct topology in three cases. Subsequently, Rosetta was used to build loops and side chains for the very best scoring models after EM-Fold refinement. The refinement within Rosetta's force field is driven by a density agreement score that calculates a cross-correlation between a density map simulated from the model and the experimental density map. All-atom RMSDs as low as 3.4 Å are achieved in favorable cases. Values above 10.0 Å are observed for two proteins with low overall content of secondary structure and hence particularly complex loop modeling problems. RMSDs over residues in secondary structure elements range from 2.5 to 4.8 Å.
Copyright © 2012 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22302372      PMCID: PMC3375387          DOI: 10.1002/bip.22027

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Biopolymers        ISSN: 0006-3525            Impact factor:   2.505


  14 in total

1.  Protein secondary structure prediction based on position-specific scoring matrices.

Authors:  D T Jones
Journal:  J Mol Biol       Date:  1999-09-17       Impact factor: 5.469

2.  EM-fold: de novo atomic-detail protein structure determination from medium-resolution density maps.

Authors:  Steffen Lindert; Nathan Alexander; Nils Wötzel; Mert Karakaş; Phoebe L Stewart; Jens Meiler
Journal:  Structure       Date:  2012-03-07       Impact factor: 5.006

3.  Coupled prediction of protein secondary and tertiary structure.

Authors:  Jens Meiler; David Baker
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2003-10-03       Impact factor: 11.205

4.  Contact order and ab initio protein structure prediction.

Authors:  Richard Bonneau; Ingo Ruczinski; Jerry Tsai; David Baker
Journal:  Protein Sci       Date:  2002-08       Impact factor: 6.725

5.  Prediction of protein secondary structure at better than 70% accuracy.

Authors:  B Rost; C Sander
Journal:  J Mol Biol       Date:  1993-07-20       Impact factor: 5.469

6.  Improved prediction of protein secondary structure by use of sequence profiles and neural networks.

Authors:  B Rost; C Sander
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  1993-08-15       Impact factor: 11.205

7.  Combining evolutionary information and neural networks to predict protein secondary structure.

Authors:  B Rost; C Sander
Journal:  Proteins       Date:  1994-05

8.  Modeling structurally variable regions in homologous proteins with rosetta.

Authors:  Carol A Rohl; Charlie E M Strauss; Dylan Chivian; David Baker
Journal:  Proteins       Date:  2004-05-15

Review 9.  Towards atomic resolution structural determination by single-particle cryo-electron microscopy.

Authors:  Z Hong Zhou
Journal:  Curr Opin Struct Biol       Date:  2008-04-09       Impact factor: 6.809

Review 10.  Hybrid approaches: applying computational methods in cryo-electron microscopy.

Authors:  Steffen Lindert; Phoebe L Stewart; Jens Meiler
Journal:  Curr Opin Struct Biol       Date:  2009-03-30       Impact factor: 6.809

View more
  19 in total

Review 1.  Constraint methods that accelerate free-energy simulations of biomolecules.

Authors:  Alberto Perez; Justin L MacCallum; Evangelos A Coutsias; Ken A Dill
Journal:  J Chem Phys       Date:  2015-12-28       Impact factor: 3.488

2.  Using NMR Chemical Shifts and Cryo-EM Density Restraints in Iterative Rosetta-MD Protein Structure Refinement.

Authors:  Sumudu P Leelananda; Steffen Lindert
Journal:  J Chem Inf Model       Date:  2019-12-24       Impact factor: 4.956

Review 3.  Hybrid methods for combined experimental and computational determination of protein structure.

Authors:  Justin T Seffernick; Steffen Lindert
Journal:  J Chem Phys       Date:  2020-12-28       Impact factor: 3.488

4.  Utility of Covalent Labeling Mass Spectrometry Data in Protein Structure Prediction with Rosetta.

Authors:  Melanie L Aprahamian; Steffen Lindert
Journal:  J Chem Theory Comput       Date:  2019-04-04       Impact factor: 6.006

5.  Iterative Molecular Dynamics-Rosetta Membrane Protein Structure Refinement Guided by Cryo-EM Densities.

Authors:  Sumudu P Leelananda; Steffen Lindert
Journal:  J Chem Theory Comput       Date:  2017-09-26       Impact factor: 6.006

6.  Rosetta Protein Structure Prediction from Hydroxyl Radical Protein Footprinting Mass Spectrometry Data.

Authors:  Melanie L Aprahamian; Emily E Chea; Lisa M Jones; Steffen Lindert
Journal:  Anal Chem       Date:  2018-06-06       Impact factor: 6.986

Review 7.  Computational modeling of membrane proteins.

Authors:  Julia Koehler Leman; Martin B Ulmschneider; Jeffrey J Gray
Journal:  Proteins       Date:  2014-11-19

8.  Computational determination of the orientation of a heat repeat-like domain of DNA-PKcs.

Authors:  Steffen Lindert; Phoebe L Stewart; Jens Meiler
Journal:  Comput Biol Chem       Date:  2012-11-19       Impact factor: 2.877

9.  Simulation-Based Methods for Model Building and Refinement in Cryoelectron Microscopy.

Authors:  Thomas Dodd; Chunli Yan; Ivaylo Ivanov
Journal:  J Chem Inf Model       Date:  2020-03-31       Impact factor: 4.956

Review 10.  Finding the needle in the haystack: towards solving the protein-folding problem computationally.

Authors:  Bian Li; Michaela Fooksa; Sten Heinze; Jens Meiler
Journal:  Crit Rev Biochem Mol Biol       Date:  2017-10-04       Impact factor: 8.250

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.