Literature DB >> 33380110

Hybrid methods for combined experimental and computational determination of protein structure.

Justin T Seffernick1, Steffen Lindert1.   

Abstract

Knowledge of protein structure is paramount to the understanding of biological function, developing new therapeutics, and making detailed mechanistic hypotheses. Therefore, methods to accurately elucidate three-dimensional structures of proteins are in high demand. While there are a few experimental techniques that can routinely provide high-resolution structures, such as x-ray crystallography, nuclear magnetic resonance (NMR), and cryo-EM, which have been developed to determine the structures of proteins, these techniques each have shortcomings and thus cannot be used in all cases. However, additionally, a large number of experimental techniques that provide some structural information, but not enough to assign atomic positions with high certainty have been developed. These methods offer sparse experimental data, which can also be noisy and inaccurate in some instances. In cases where it is not possible to determine the structure of a protein experimentally, computational structure prediction methods can be used as an alternative. Although computational methods can be performed without any experimental data in a large number of studies, inclusion of sparse experimental data into these prediction methods has yielded significant improvement. In this Perspective, we cover many of the successes of integrative modeling, computational modeling with experimental data, specifically for protein folding, protein-protein docking, and molecular dynamics simulations. We describe methods that incorporate sparse data from cryo-EM, NMR, mass spectrometry, electron paramagnetic resonance, small-angle x-ray scattering, Förster resonance energy transfer, and genetic sequence covariation. Finally, we highlight some of the major challenges in the field as well as possible future directions.

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2020        PMID: 33380110      PMCID: PMC7773420          DOI: 10.1063/5.0026025

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Chem Phys        ISSN: 0021-9606            Impact factor:   3.488


  290 in total

1.  Protein structure determination from NMR chemical shifts.

Authors:  Andrea Cavalli; Xavier Salvatella; Christopher M Dobson; Michele Vendruscolo
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2007-05-29       Impact factor: 11.205

2.  Toward optimal fragment generations for ab initio protein structure assembly.

Authors:  Dong Xu; Yang Zhang
Journal:  Proteins       Date:  2012-10-16

3.  On the ability of molecular dynamics force fields to recapitulate NMR derived protein side chain order parameters.

Authors:  Evan S O'Brien; A Joshua Wand; Kim A Sharp
Journal:  Protein Sci       Date:  2016-04-04       Impact factor: 6.725

4.  SAXS-Restrained Ensemble Simulations of Intrinsically Disordered Proteins with Commitment to the Principle of Maximum Entropy.

Authors:  Markus R Hermann; Jochen S Hub
Journal:  J Chem Theory Comput       Date:  2019-08-26       Impact factor: 6.006

5.  Using a FRET Library with Multiple Probe Pairs To Drive Monte Carlo Simulations of α-Synuclein.

Authors:  John J Ferrie; Conor M Haney; Jimin Yoon; Buyan Pan; Yi-Chih Lin; Zahra Fakhraai; Elizabeth Rhoades; Abhinav Nath; E James Petersson
Journal:  Biophys J       Date:  2018-01-09       Impact factor: 4.033

6.  TOWARD BAYESIAN INFERENCE OF THE SPATIAL DISTRIBUTION OF PROTEINS FROM THREE-CUBE FÖRSTER RESONANCE ENERGY TRANSFER DATA.

Authors:  Jan-Otto Hooghoudt; Margarida Barroso; Rasmus Waagepetersen
Journal:  Ann Appl Stat       Date:  2017-10-05       Impact factor: 2.083

7.  Disentangling direct from indirect co-evolution of residues in protein alignments.

Authors:  Lukas Burger; Erik van Nimwegen
Journal:  PLoS Comput Biol       Date:  2010-01-01       Impact factor: 4.475

8.  Metainference: A Bayesian inference method for heterogeneous systems.

Authors:  Massimiliano Bonomi; Carlo Camilloni; Andrea Cavalli; Michele Vendruscolo
Journal:  Sci Adv       Date:  2016-01-22       Impact factor: 14.136

9.  De novo main-chain modeling for EM maps using MAINMAST.

Authors:  Genki Terashi; Daisuke Kihara
Journal:  Nat Commun       Date:  2018-04-24       Impact factor: 14.919

10.  An analysis and evaluation of the WeFold collaborative for protein structure prediction and its pipelines in CASP11 and CASP12.

Authors:  Chen Keasar; Liam J McGuffin; Björn Wallner; Gaurav Chopra; Badri Adhikari; Debswapna Bhattacharya; Lauren Blake; Leandro Oliveira Bortot; Renzhi Cao; B K Dhanasekaran; Itzhel Dimas; Rodrigo Antonio Faccioli; Eshel Faraggi; Robert Ganzynkowicz; Sambit Ghosh; Soma Ghosh; Artur Giełdoń; Lukasz Golon; Yi He; Lim Heo; Jie Hou; Main Khan; Firas Khatib; George A Khoury; Chris Kieslich; David E Kim; Pawel Krupa; Gyu Rie Lee; Hongbo Li; Jilong Li; Agnieszka Lipska; Adam Liwo; Ali Hassan A Maghrabi; Milot Mirdita; Shokoufeh Mirzaei; Magdalena A Mozolewska; Melis Onel; Sergey Ovchinnikov; Anand Shah; Utkarsh Shah; Tomer Sidi; Adam K Sieradzan; Magdalena Ślusarz; Rafal Ślusarz; James Smadbeck; Phanourios Tamamis; Nicholas Trieber; Tomasz Wirecki; Yanping Yin; Yang Zhang; Jaume Bacardit; Maciej Baranowski; Nicholas Chapman; Seth Cooper; Alexandre Defelicibus; Jeff Flatten; Brian Koepnick; Zoran Popović; Bartlomiej Zaborowski; David Baker; Jianlin Cheng; Cezary Czaplewski; Alexandre Cláudio Botazzo Delbem; Christodoulos Floudas; Andrzej Kloczkowski; Stanislaw Ołdziej; Michael Levitt; Harold Scheraga; Chaok Seok; Johannes Söding; Saraswathi Vishveshwara; Dong Xu; Silvia N Crivelli
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2018-07-02       Impact factor: 4.379

View more
  9 in total

1.  Accounting for Neighboring Residue Hydrophobicity in Diethylpyrocarbonate Labeling Mass Spectrometry Improves Rosetta Protein Structure Prediction.

Authors:  Sarah E Biehn; Danielle M Picarello; Xiao Pan; Richard W Vachet; Steffen Lindert
Journal:  J Am Soc Mass Spectrom       Date:  2022-02-11       Impact factor: 3.109

Review 2.  Protein Function Analysis through Machine Learning.

Authors:  Chris Avery; John Patterson; Tyler Grear; Theodore Frater; Donald J Jacobs
Journal:  Biomolecules       Date:  2022-09-06

Review 3.  Computational Structure Prediction for Antibody-Antigen Complexes From Hydrogen-Deuterium Exchange Mass Spectrometry: Challenges and Outlook.

Authors:  Minh H Tran; Clara T Schoeder; Kevin L Schey; Jens Meiler
Journal:  Front Immunol       Date:  2022-05-26       Impact factor: 8.786

Review 4.  Approaches to Heterogeneity in Native Mass Spectrometry.

Authors:  Amber D Rolland; James S Prell
Journal:  Chem Rev       Date:  2021-09-01       Impact factor: 72.087

5.  Prediction of Protein Complex Structure Using Surface-Induced Dissociation and Cryo-Electron Microscopy.

Authors:  Justin T Seffernick; Shane M Canfield; Sophie R Harvey; Vicki H Wysocki; Steffen Lindert
Journal:  Anal Chem       Date:  2021-05-17       Impact factor: 8.008

6.  Editorial: Integrative Structural Biology of Proteins and Macromolecular Assemblies: Bridging Experiments and Simulations.

Authors:  Paulo Ricardo Batista; Mario Oliveira Neto; David Perahia
Journal:  Front Mol Biosci       Date:  2022-06-27

7.  Protein shape sampled by ion mobility mass spectrometry consistently improves protein structure prediction.

Authors:  S M Bargeen Alam Turzo; Justin T Seffernick; Amber D Rolland; Micah T Donor; Sten Heinze; James S Prell; Vicki H Wysocki; Steffen Lindert
Journal:  Nat Commun       Date:  2022-07-28       Impact factor: 17.694

8.  Multiscale modeling of genome organization with maximum entropy optimization.

Authors:  Xingcheng Lin; Yifeng Qi; Andrew P Latham; Bin Zhang
Journal:  J Chem Phys       Date:  2021-07-07       Impact factor: 3.488

9.  Utilization of Hydrophobic Microenvironment Sensitivity in Diethylpyrocarbonate Labeling for Protein Structure Prediction.

Authors:  Sarah E Biehn; Patanachai Limpikirati; Richard W Vachet; Steffen Lindert
Journal:  Anal Chem       Date:  2021-06-01       Impact factor: 8.008

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.