Literature DB >> 29874044

Rosetta Protein Structure Prediction from Hydroxyl Radical Protein Footprinting Mass Spectrometry Data.

Melanie L Aprahamian1, Emily E Chea2, Lisa M Jones2, Steffen Lindert1.   

Abstract

In recent years mass spectrometry-based covalent labeling techniques such as hydroxyl radical footprinting (HRF) have emerged as valuable structural biology techniques, yielding information on protein tertiary structure. These data, however, are not sufficient to predict protein structure unambiguously, as they provide information only on the relative solvent exposure of certain residues. Despite some recent advances, no software currently exists that can utilize covalent labeling mass spectrometry data to predict protein tertiary structure. We have developed the first such tool, which incorporates mass spectrometry derived protection factors from HRF labeling as a new centroid score term for the Rosetta scoring function to improve the prediction of protein tertiary structures. We tested our method on a set of four soluble benchmark proteins with known crystal structures and either published HRF experimental results or internally acquired data. Using the HRF labeling data, we rescored large decoy sets of structures predicted with Rosetta for each of the four benchmark proteins. As a result, the model quality improved for all benchmark proteins as compared to when scored with Rosetta alone. For two of the four proteins we were even able to identify atomic resolution models with the addition of HRF data.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2018        PMID: 29874044      PMCID: PMC6008241          DOI: 10.1021/acs.analchem.8b01624

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Anal Chem        ISSN: 0003-2700            Impact factor:   6.986


  69 in total

1.  Toward high-resolution de novo structure prediction for small proteins.

Authors:  Philip Bradley; Kira M S Misura; David Baker
Journal:  Science       Date:  2005-09-16       Impact factor: 47.728

2.  Theoretical modeling of multiprotein complexes by iSPOT: Integration of small-angle X-ray scattering, hydroxyl radical footprinting, and computational docking.

Authors:  Wei Huang; Krishnakumar M Ravikumar; Marc Parisien; Sichun Yang
Journal:  J Struct Biol       Date:  2016-08-02       Impact factor: 2.867

3.  Structural characterization by cross-linking reveals the detailed architecture of a coatomer-related heptameric module from the nuclear pore complex.

Authors:  Yi Shi; Javier Fernandez-Martinez; Elina Tjioe; Riccardo Pellarin; Seung Joong Kim; Rosemary Williams; Dina Schneidman-Duhovny; Andrej Sali; Michael P Rout; Brian T Chait
Journal:  Mol Cell Proteomics       Date:  2014-08-26       Impact factor: 5.911

4.  Quantitative protein topography analysis and high-resolution structure prediction using hydroxyl radical labeling and tandem-ion mass spectrometry (MS).

Authors:  Parminder Kaur; Janna Kiselar; Sichun Yang; Mark R Chance
Journal:  Mol Cell Proteomics       Date:  2015-02-16       Impact factor: 5.911

5.  Direct analysis of protein complexes using mass spectrometry.

Authors:  A J Link; J Eng; D M Schieltz; E Carmack; G J Mize; D R Morris; B M Garvik; J R Yates
Journal:  Nat Biotechnol       Date:  1999-07       Impact factor: 54.908

6.  Solvent accessible surface area approximations for rapid and accurate protein structure prediction.

Authors:  Elizabeth Durham; Brent Dorr; Nils Woetzel; René Staritzbichler; Jens Meiler
Journal:  J Mol Model       Date:  2009-02-21       Impact factor: 1.810

7.  A mass spectrometry method for mapping the interface topography of interacting proteins, illustrated by the melittin-calmodulin system.

Authors:  R F Steiner; S Albaugh; C Fenselau; C Murphy; M Vestling
Journal:  Anal Biochem       Date:  1991-07       Impact factor: 3.365

8.  Identification of the active site of DS-epimerase 1 and requirement of N-glycosylation for enzyme function.

Authors:  Benny Pacheco; Marco Maccarana; David R Goodlett; Anders Malmström; Lars Malmström
Journal:  J Biol Chem       Date:  2008-11-11       Impact factor: 5.157

9.  RosettaEPR: rotamer library for spin label structure and dynamics.

Authors:  Nathan S Alexander; Richard A Stein; Hanane A Koteiche; Kristian W Kaufmann; Hassane S McHaourab; Jens Meiler
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2013-09-05       Impact factor: 3.240

10.  Quantitative Protein Topography Measurements by High Resolution Hydroxyl Radical Protein Footprinting Enable Accurate Molecular Model Selection.

Authors:  Boer Xie; Amika Sood; Robert J Woods; Joshua S Sharp
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2017-07-03       Impact factor: 4.379

View more
  22 in total

1.  Using NMR Chemical Shifts and Cryo-EM Density Restraints in Iterative Rosetta-MD Protein Structure Refinement.

Authors:  Sumudu P Leelananda; Steffen Lindert
Journal:  J Chem Inf Model       Date:  2019-12-24       Impact factor: 4.956

Review 2.  Fast photochemical oxidation of proteins (FPOP): A powerful mass spectrometry-based structural proteomics tool.

Authors:  Danté T Johnson; Luciano H Di Stefano; Lisa M Jones
Journal:  J Biol Chem       Date:  2019-07-01       Impact factor: 5.157

Review 3.  Hybrid methods for combined experimental and computational determination of protein structure.

Authors:  Justin T Seffernick; Steffen Lindert
Journal:  J Chem Phys       Date:  2020-12-28       Impact factor: 3.488

4.  Utility of Covalent Labeling Mass Spectrometry Data in Protein Structure Prediction with Rosetta.

Authors:  Melanie L Aprahamian; Steffen Lindert
Journal:  J Chem Theory Comput       Date:  2019-04-04       Impact factor: 6.006

Review 5.  Mass Spectrometry-Based Protein Footprinting for Higher-Order Structure Analysis: Fundamentals and Applications.

Authors:  Xiaoran Roger Liu; Mengru Mira Zhang; Michael L Gross
Journal:  Chem Rev       Date:  2020-04-22       Impact factor: 60.622

6.  Measuring Intrinsic Disorder and Tracking Conformational Transitions Using Rosetta ResidueDisorder.

Authors:  Justin T Seffernick; He Ren; Stephanie S Kim; Steffen Lindert
Journal:  J Phys Chem B       Date:  2019-08-14       Impact factor: 2.991

Review 7.  Evolution of Structural Biology through the Lens of Mass Spectrometry.

Authors:  Upneet Kaur; Danté T Johnson; Emily E Chea; Daniel J Deredge; Jessica A Espino; Lisa M Jones
Journal:  Anal Chem       Date:  2018-12-06       Impact factor: 6.986

Review 8.  Experimentally-driven protein structure modeling.

Authors:  Nikolay V Dokholyan
Journal:  J Proteomics       Date:  2020-04-05       Impact factor: 4.044

Review 9.  Protein Footprinting: Auxiliary Engine to Power the Structural Biology Revolution.

Authors:  Mark R Chance; Erik R Farquhar; Sichun Yang; David T Lodowski; Janna Kiselar
Journal:  J Mol Biol       Date:  2020-02-21       Impact factor: 5.469

10.  Integrative Protein Modeling in RosettaNMR from Sparse Paramagnetic Restraints.

Authors:  Georg Kuenze; Richard Bonneau; Julia Koehler Leman; Jens Meiler
Journal:  Structure       Date:  2019-09-12       Impact factor: 5.006

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.