Literature DB >> 30946594

Utility of Covalent Labeling Mass Spectrometry Data in Protein Structure Prediction with Rosetta.

Melanie L Aprahamian1, Steffen Lindert1.   

Abstract

Covalent labeling mass spectrometry experiments are growing in popularity and provide important information regarding protein structure. Information obtained from these experiments correlates with residue solvent exposure within the protein in solution. However, it is impossible to determine protein structure from covalent labeling data alone. Incorporation of sparse covalent labeling data into the protein structure prediction software Rosetta has been shown to improve protein tertiary structure prediction. Here, covalent labeling techniques were analyzed computationally to provide insight into what labeling data is needed to optimize tertiary protein structure prediction in Rosetta. We have successfully implemented a new scoring functionality that provides improved predictions. We developed two new covalent labeling based score terms that use a "cone"-based neighbor count to quantify the relative solvent exposure of each amino acid. To test our method, we used a set of 20 proteins with structures deposited in the Protein Data Bank. Decoy model sets were generated for each of these 20 proteins, and the normalized covalent labeling score versus RMSD distributions were evaluated. On the basis of these distributions, we have determined an optimal subset of residues to use when performing covalent labeling experiments in order to maximize the structure prediction capabilities of the covalent labeling data. We also investigated how much false negative and false positive data can be tolerated without meaningfully impacting protein structure prediction. Using these new covalent labeling score terms, protein models were rescored and the resulting models improved by 3.9 Å RMSD on average. New models were also generated using Rosetta's AbinitioRelax program under the guidance of covalent labeling information, and improvement in model quality was observed.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2019        PMID: 30946594      PMCID: PMC6520167          DOI: 10.1021/acs.jctc.9b00101

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Chem Theory Comput        ISSN: 1549-9618            Impact factor:   6.006


  47 in total

1.  EMBOSS: the European Molecular Biology Open Software Suite.

Authors:  P Rice; I Longden; A Bleasby
Journal:  Trends Genet       Date:  2000-06       Impact factor: 11.639

2.  Rosetta in CASP4: progress in ab initio protein structure prediction.

Authors:  R Bonneau; J Tsai; I Ruczinski; D Chivian; C Rohl; C E Strauss; D Baker
Journal:  Proteins       Date:  2001

Review 3.  Radical approaches to probe protein structure, folding, and interactions by mass spectrometry.

Authors:  S D Maleknia; K Downard
Journal:  Mass Spectrom Rev       Date:  2001 Nov-Dec       Impact factor: 10.946

4.  Improved recognition of native-like protein structures using a combination of sequence-dependent and sequence-independent features of proteins.

Authors:  K T Simons; I Ruczinski; C Kooperberg; B A Fox; C Bystroff; D Baker
Journal:  Proteins       Date:  1999-01-01

5.  De novo prediction of three-dimensional structures for major protein families.

Authors:  Richard Bonneau; Charlie E M Strauss; Carol A Rohl; Dylan Chivian; Phillip Bradley; Lars Malmström; Tim Robertson; David Baker
Journal:  J Mol Biol       Date:  2002-09-06       Impact factor: 5.469

6.  Protein structure prediction and analysis using the Robetta server.

Authors:  David E Kim; Dylan Chivian; David Baker
Journal:  Nucleic Acids Res       Date:  2004-07-01       Impact factor: 16.971

7.  Radiolytic modification and reactivity of amino acid residues serving as structural probes for protein footprinting.

Authors:  Guozhong Xu; Mark R Chance
Journal:  Anal Chem       Date:  2005-07-15       Impact factor: 6.986

8.  Inhibition of plasmodium falciparum triose-phosphate isomerase by chemical modification of an interface cysteine. Electrospray ionization mass spectrometric analysis of differential cysteine reactivities.

Authors:  Kapil Maithal; Gudihal Ravindra; Hemalatha Balaram; Padmanabhan Balaram
Journal:  J Biol Chem       Date:  2002-05-02       Impact factor: 5.157

9.  Probing the topology of the glycine receptor by chemical modification coupled to mass spectrometry.

Authors:  John F Leite; Michael Cascio
Journal:  Biochemistry       Date:  2002-05-14       Impact factor: 3.162

10.  A top-down method for the determination of residue-specific solvent accessibility in proteins.

Authors:  Petr Novak; Gary H Kruppa; Malin M Young; Joe Schoeniger
Journal:  J Mass Spectrom       Date:  2004-03       Impact factor: 1.982

View more
  12 in total

1.  Using NMR Chemical Shifts and Cryo-EM Density Restraints in Iterative Rosetta-MD Protein Structure Refinement.

Authors:  Sumudu P Leelananda; Steffen Lindert
Journal:  J Chem Inf Model       Date:  2019-12-24       Impact factor: 4.956

Review 2.  Hybrid methods for combined experimental and computational determination of protein structure.

Authors:  Justin T Seffernick; Steffen Lindert
Journal:  J Chem Phys       Date:  2020-12-28       Impact factor: 3.488

Review 3.  Mass Spectrometry-Based Protein Footprinting for Higher-Order Structure Analysis: Fundamentals and Applications.

Authors:  Xiaoran Roger Liu; Mengru Mira Zhang; Michael L Gross
Journal:  Chem Rev       Date:  2020-04-22       Impact factor: 60.622

4.  Accounting for Neighboring Residue Hydrophobicity in Diethylpyrocarbonate Labeling Mass Spectrometry Improves Rosetta Protein Structure Prediction.

Authors:  Sarah E Biehn; Danielle M Picarello; Xiao Pan; Richard W Vachet; Steffen Lindert
Journal:  J Am Soc Mass Spectrom       Date:  2022-02-11       Impact factor: 3.109

5.  Protein higher-order-structure determination by fast photochemical oxidation of proteins and mass spectrometry analysis.

Authors:  Xiaoran Roger Liu; Don L Rempel; Michael L Gross
Journal:  Nat Protoc       Date:  2020-11-09       Impact factor: 13.491

Review 6.  Crosslinking mass spectrometry: A link between structural biology and systems biology.

Authors:  Xiaoting Tang; Helisa H Wippel; Juan D Chavez; James E Bruce
Journal:  Protein Sci       Date:  2021-03-06       Impact factor: 6.725

7.  Prediction of Protein Complex Structure Using Surface-Induced Dissociation and Cryo-Electron Microscopy.

Authors:  Justin T Seffernick; Shane M Canfield; Sophie R Harvey; Vicki H Wysocki; Steffen Lindert
Journal:  Anal Chem       Date:  2021-05-17       Impact factor: 8.008

8.  PyXlinkViewer: A flexible tool for visualization of protein chemical crosslinking data within the PyMOL molecular graphics system.

Authors:  Bob Schiffrin; Sheena E Radford; David J Brockwell; Antonio N Calabrese
Journal:  Protein Sci       Date:  2020-07-03       Impact factor: 6.725

9.  Utilization of Hydrophobic Microenvironment Sensitivity in Diethylpyrocarbonate Labeling for Protein Structure Prediction.

Authors:  Sarah E Biehn; Patanachai Limpikirati; Richard W Vachet; Steffen Lindert
Journal:  Anal Chem       Date:  2021-06-01       Impact factor: 8.008

Review 10.  Structural Proteomics Methods to Interrogate the Conformations and Dynamics of Intrinsically Disordered Proteins.

Authors:  Rebecca Beveridge; Antonio N Calabrese
Journal:  Front Chem       Date:  2021-03-11       Impact factor: 5.221

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.