Literature DB >> 26723628

Constraint methods that accelerate free-energy simulations of biomolecules.

Alberto Perez1, Justin L MacCallum2, Evangelos A Coutsias1, Ken A Dill1.   

Abstract

Atomistic molecular dynamics simulations of biomolecules are critical for generating narratives about biological mechanisms. The power of atomistic simulations is that these are physics-based methods that satisfy Boltzmann's law, so they can be used to compute populations, dynamics, and mechanisms. But physical simulations are computationally intensive and do not scale well to the sizes of many important biomolecules. One way to speed up physical simulations is by coarse-graining the potential function. Another way is to harness structural knowledge, often by imposing spring-like restraints. But harnessing external knowledge in physical simulations is problematic because knowledge, data, or hunches have errors, noise, and combinatoric uncertainties. Here, we review recent principled methods for imposing restraints to speed up physics-based molecular simulations that promise to scale to larger biomolecules and motions.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2015        PMID: 26723628      PMCID: PMC4684272          DOI: 10.1063/1.4936911

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Chem Phys        ISSN: 0021-9606            Impact factor:   3.488


  66 in total

1.  Protein structure prediction and structural genomics.

Authors:  D Baker; A Sali
Journal:  Science       Date:  2001-10-05       Impact factor: 47.728

2.  Cyclic coordinate descent: A robotics algorithm for protein loop closure.

Authors:  Adrian A Canutescu; Roland L Dunbrack
Journal:  Protein Sci       Date:  2003-05       Impact factor: 6.725

3.  Escaping free-energy minima.

Authors:  Alessandro Laio; Michele Parrinello
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2002-09-23       Impact factor: 11.205

4.  A hierarchical approach to all-atom protein loop prediction.

Authors:  Matthew P Jacobson; David L Pincus; Chaya S Rapp; Tyler J F Day; Barry Honig; David E Shaw; Richard A Friesner
Journal:  Proteins       Date:  2004-05-01

5.  Monte Carlo Sampling with Linear Inverse Kinematics for Simulation of Protein Flexible Regions.

Authors:  Steven Hayward; Akio Kitao
Journal:  J Chem Theory Comput       Date:  2015-08-11       Impact factor: 6.006

6.  Porter: a new, accurate server for protein secondary structure prediction.

Authors:  Gianluca Pollastri; Aoife McLysaght
Journal:  Bioinformatics       Date:  2004-12-07       Impact factor: 6.937

7.  De novo high-resolution protein structure determination from sparse spin-labeling EPR data.

Authors:  Nathan Alexander; Marco Bortolus; Ahmad Al-Mestarihi; Hassane Mchaourab; Jens Meiler
Journal:  Structure       Date:  2008-02       Impact factor: 5.006

8.  A proton-detected 4D solid-state NMR experiment for protein structure determination.

Authors:  Matthias Huber; Sebastian Hiller; Paul Schanda; Matthias Ernst; Anja Böckmann; René Verel; Beat H Meier
Journal:  Chemphyschem       Date:  2011-02-15       Impact factor: 3.102

9.  Determining protein structures by combining semireliable data with atomistic physical models by Bayesian inference.

Authors:  Justin L MacCallum; Alberto Perez; Ken A Dill
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2015-05-18       Impact factor: 11.205

10.  Optimization of the additive CHARMM all-atom protein force field targeting improved sampling of the backbone φ, ψ and side-chain χ(1) and χ(2) dihedral angles.

Authors:  Robert B Best; Xiao Zhu; Jihyun Shim; Pedro E M Lopes; Jeetain Mittal; Michael Feig; Alexander D Mackerell
Journal:  J Chem Theory Comput       Date:  2012-07-18       Impact factor: 6.006

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.