Literature DB >> 15103629

Modeling structurally variable regions in homologous proteins with rosetta.

Carol A Rohl1, Charlie E M Strauss, Dylan Chivian, David Baker.   

Abstract

A major limitation of current comparative modeling methods is the accuracy with which regions that are structurally divergent from homologues of known structure can be modeled. Because structural differences between homologous proteins are responsible for variations in protein function and specificity, the ability to model these differences has important functional consequences. Although existing methods can provide reasonably accurate models of short loop regions, modeling longer structurally divergent regions is an unsolved problem. Here we describe a method based on the de novo structure prediction algorithm, Rosetta, for predicting conformations of structurally divergent regions in comparative models. Initial conformations for short segments are selected from the protein structure database, whereas longer segments are built up by using three- and nine-residue fragments drawn from the database and combined by using the Rosetta algorithm. A gap closure term in the potential in combination with modified Newton's method for gradient descent minimization is used to ensure continuity of the peptide backbone. Conformations of variable regions are refined in the context of a fixed template structure using Monte Carlo minimization together with rapid repacking of side-chains to iteratively optimize backbone torsion angles and side-chain rotamers. For short loops, mean accuracies of 0.69, 1.45, and 3.62 A are obtained for 4, 8, and 12 residue loops, respectively. In addition, the method can provide reasonable models of conformations of longer protein segments: predicted conformations of 3A root-mean-square deviation or better were obtained for 5 of 10 examples of segments ranging from 13 to 34 residues. In combination with a sequence alignment algorithm, this method generates complete, ungapped models of protein structures, including regions both similar to and divergent from a homologous structure. This combined method was used to make predictions for 28 protein domains in the Critical Assessment of Protein Structure 4 (CASP 4) and 59 domains in CASP 5, where the method ranked highly among comparative modeling and fold recognition methods. Model accuracy in these blind predictions is dominated by alignment quality, but in the context of accurate alignments, long protein segments can be accurately modeled. Notably, the method correctly predicted the local structure of a 39-residue insertion into a TIM barrel in CASP 5 target T0186. Copyright 2004 Wiley-Liss, Inc.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2004        PMID: 15103629     DOI: 10.1002/prot.10629

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Proteins        ISSN: 0887-3585


  148 in total

1.  SIDEpro: a novel machine learning approach for the fast and accurate prediction of side-chain conformations.

Authors:  Ken Nagata; Arlo Randall; Pierre Baldi
Journal:  Proteins       Date:  2011-11-09

2.  Protein structure prediction and analysis using the Robetta server.

Authors:  David E Kim; Dylan Chivian; David Baker
Journal:  Nucleic Acids Res       Date:  2004-07-01       Impact factor: 16.971

3.  Ab initio protein modeling into CryoEM density maps using EM-Fold.

Authors:  Steffen Lindert; Tommy Hofmann; Nils Wötzel; Mert Karakaş; Phoebe L Stewart; Jens Meiler
Journal:  Biopolymers       Date:  2012-02-03       Impact factor: 2.505

4.  A Bayesian approach for determining protein side-chain rotamer conformations using unassigned NOE data.

Authors:  Jianyang Zeng; Kyle E Roberts; Pei Zhou; Bruce Randall Donald
Journal:  J Comput Biol       Date:  2011-10-04       Impact factor: 1.479

5.  Union of geometric constraint-based simulations with molecular dynamics for protein structure prediction.

Authors:  Tyler J Glembo; S Banu Ozkan
Journal:  Biophys J       Date:  2010-03-17       Impact factor: 4.033

6.  Circularly permuted monomeric red fluorescent proteins with new termini in the beta-sheet.

Authors:  Haley J Carlson; Darrel W Cotton; Robert E Campbell
Journal:  Protein Sci       Date:  2010-08       Impact factor: 6.725

7.  Protein loop modeling by using fragment assembly and analytical loop closure.

Authors:  Julian Lee; Dongseon Lee; Hahnbeom Park; Evangelos A Coutsias; Chaok Seok
Journal:  Proteins       Date:  2010-09-24

8.  Support-vector-machine classification of linear functional motifs in proteins.

Authors:  Dariusz Plewczynski; Adrian Tkacz; Lucjan Stanisław Wyrwicz; Adam Godzik; Andrzej Kloczkowski; Leszek Rychlewski
Journal:  J Mol Model       Date:  2005-12-10       Impact factor: 1.810

9.  Prediction of protein loop structures using a local move Monte Carlo approach and a grid-based force field.

Authors:  Meng Cui; Mihaly Mezei; Roman Osman
Journal:  Protein Eng Des Sel       Date:  2008-10-27       Impact factor: 1.650

10.  Coarse-grained modeling of large RNA molecules with knowledge-based potentials and structural filters.

Authors:  Magdalena A Jonikas; Randall J Radmer; Alain Laederach; Rhiju Das; Samuel Pearlman; Daniel Herschlag; Russ B Altman
Journal:  RNA       Date:  2009-02       Impact factor: 4.942

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.