Literature DB >> 28976219

Finding the needle in the haystack: towards solving the protein-folding problem computationally.

Bian Li1,2, Michaela Fooksa2,3, Sten Heinze1,2, Jens Meiler1,2.   

Abstract

Prediction of protein tertiary structures from amino acid sequence and understanding the mechanisms of how proteins fold, collectively known as "the protein folding problem," has been a grand challenge in molecular biology for over half a century. Theories have been developed that provide us with an unprecedented understanding of protein folding mechanisms. However, computational simulation of protein folding is still difficult, and prediction of protein tertiary structure from amino acid sequence is an unsolved problem. Progress toward a satisfying solution has been slow due to challenges in sampling the vast conformational space and deriving sufficiently accurate energy functions. Nevertheless, several techniques and algorithms have been adopted to overcome these challenges, and the last two decades have seen exciting advances in enhanced sampling algorithms, computational power and tertiary structure prediction methodologies. This review aims at summarizing these computational techniques, specifically conformational sampling algorithms and energy approximations that have been frequently used to study protein-folding mechanisms or to de novo predict protein tertiary structures. We hope that this review can serve as an overview on how the protein-folding problem can be studied computationally and, in cases where experimental approaches are prohibitive, help the researcher choose the most relevant computational approach for the problem at hand. We conclude with a summary of current challenges faced and an outlook on potential future directions.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Protein-folding problem; conformational sampling algorithms; protein energy approximations; protein structure prediction; protein-folding simulation; sparse experimental data

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2017        PMID: 28976219      PMCID: PMC6790072          DOI: 10.1080/10409238.2017.1380596

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Crit Rev Biochem Mol Biol        ISSN: 1040-9238            Impact factor:   8.250


  298 in total

Review 1.  Inter-residue interactions in protein folding and stability.

Authors:  M Michael Gromiha; S Selvaraj
Journal:  Prog Biophys Mol Biol       Date:  2004-10       Impact factor: 3.667

2.  Statistical torsion angle potential energy functions for protein structure modeling: a bicubic interpolation approach.

Authors:  Tae-Rae Kim; Joshua Sungwoo Yang; Seokmin Shin; Jinhyuk Lee
Journal:  Proteins       Date:  2013-04-10

Review 3.  Principles and Overview of Sampling Methods for Modeling Macromolecular Structure and Dynamics.

Authors:  Tatiana Maximova; Ryan Moffatt; Buyong Ma; Ruth Nussinov; Amarda Shehu
Journal:  PLoS Comput Biol       Date:  2016-04-28       Impact factor: 4.475

4.  Nucleation, rapid folding, and globular intrachain regions in proteins.

Authors:  D B Wetlaufer
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  1973-03       Impact factor: 11.205

5.  Prediction of protein secondary structure at better than 70% accuracy.

Authors:  B Rost; C Sander
Journal:  J Mol Biol       Date:  1993-07-20       Impact factor: 5.469

6.  Design of native-like proteins through an exposure-dependent environment potential.

Authors:  Samuel DeLuca; Brent Dorr; Jens Meiler
Journal:  Biochemistry       Date:  2011-09-19       Impact factor: 3.162

7.  CASP9 assessment of free modeling target predictions.

Authors:  Lisa Kinch; Shuo Yong Shi; Qian Cong; Hua Cheng; Yuxing Liao; Nick V Grishin
Journal:  Proteins       Date:  2011-10-14

8.  Potentials of mean force for protein structure prediction vindicated, formalized and generalized.

Authors:  Thomas Hamelryck; Mikael Borg; Martin Paluszewski; Jonas Paulsen; Jes Frellsen; Christian Andreetta; Wouter Boomsma; Sandro Bottaro; Jesper Ferkinghoff-Borg
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2010-11-10       Impact factor: 3.240

9.  PconsFold: improved contact predictions improve protein models.

Authors:  Mirco Michel; Sikander Hayat; Marcin J Skwark; Chris Sander; Debora S Marks; Arne Elofsson
Journal:  Bioinformatics       Date:  2014-09-01       Impact factor: 6.937

10.  Disentangling direct from indirect co-evolution of residues in protein alignments.

Authors:  Lukas Burger; Erik van Nimwegen
Journal:  PLoS Comput Biol       Date:  2010-01-01       Impact factor: 4.475

View more
  7 in total

1.  Comparison of Peptide Ion Conformers Arising from Non-Helical and Helical Peptides Using Ion Mobility Spectrometry and Gas-Phase Hydrogen/Deuterium Exchange.

Authors:  Ahmad Kiani Karanji; Mahdiar Khakinejad; Samaneh Ghassabi Kondalaji; Sandra N Majuta; Kushani Attanayake; Stephen J Valentine
Journal:  J Am Soc Mass Spectrom       Date:  2018-10-15       Impact factor: 3.109

2.  Refolding of Lysozyme in Glycerol as Studied by Fast Scanning Calorimetry.

Authors:  Alisa Fatkhutdinova; Timur Mukhametzyanov; Christoph Schick
Journal:  Int J Mol Sci       Date:  2022-03-02       Impact factor: 5.923

3.  A Multitask Deep-Learning Method for Predicting Membrane Associations and Secondary Structures of Proteins.

Authors:  Bian Li; Jeffrey Mendenhall; John A Capra; Jens Meiler
Journal:  J Proteome Res       Date:  2021-07-08       Impact factor: 5.370

4.  Interfaces Between Alpha-helical Integral Membrane Proteins: Characterization, Prediction, and Docking.

Authors:  Bian Li; Jeffrey Mendenhall; Jens Meiler
Journal:  Comput Struct Biotechnol J       Date:  2019-05-25       Impact factor: 7.271

5.  Predicting changes in protein thermodynamic stability upon point mutation with deep 3D convolutional neural networks.

Authors:  Bian Li; Yucheng T Yang; John A Capra; Mark B Gerstein
Journal:  PLoS Comput Biol       Date:  2020-11-30       Impact factor: 4.475

6.  Improved Protein Structure Prediction Using a New Multi-Scale Network and Homologous Templates.

Authors:  Hong Su; Wenkai Wang; Zongyang Du; Zhenling Peng; Shang-Hua Gao; Ming-Ming Cheng; Jianyi Yang
Journal:  Adv Sci (Weinh)       Date:  2021-10-31       Impact factor: 16.806

Review 7.  Combined approaches from physics, statistics, and computer science for ab initio protein structure prediction: ex unitate vires (unity is strength)?

Authors:  Marc Delarue; Patrice Koehl
Journal:  F1000Res       Date:  2018-07-24
  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.