Literature DB >> 12691216

Background noise levels and reverberation times in unoccupied classrooms: predictions and measurements.

Heather A Knecht1, Peggy B Nelson, Gail M Whitelaw, Lawrence L Feth.   

Abstract

Classrooms are often filled with deterrents that hamper a child's ability to listen and learn. It is evident that the acoustical environment in classrooms can be one such deterrent. Excessive background noise and reverberation can affect the achievement and educational performance of children with sensorineural hearing loss (SNHL) and children with normal hearing sensitivity who have other auditory learning difficulties, as well as elementary school children with no verbal or hearing disabilities. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the extent of the problem of noise and reverberation in schools. To that end, we measured reverberation times and background noise levels in 32 different unoccupied elementary classrooms in eight public school buildings in central Ohio. The results were compared with the limits recommended in the American National Standards Institute standard for acoustical characteristics of classrooms in the United States (ANSI S12.60-2002). These measurements were also compared to the external and internal criteria variables developed by Crandell, Smaldino, & Flexer (1995) to determine if a simple checklist can accurately predict unwanted classroom background noise levels and reverberation. Results indicated that most classrooms were not in compliance with ANSI noise and reverberation standards. Further, our results suggested that a checklist was not a good predictor of the noisier and more reverberant rooms.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2002        PMID: 12691216     DOI: 10.1044/1059-0889(2002/009)

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Audiol        ISSN: 1059-0889            Impact factor:   1.493


  43 in total

1.  Experimental investigation of the effects of the acoustical conditions in a simulated classroom on speech recognition and learning in children.

Authors:  Daniel L Valente; Hallie M Plevinsky; John M Franco; Elizabeth C Heinrichs-Graham; Dawna E Lewis
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2012-01       Impact factor: 1.840

Review 2.  Remote Microphone Technology for Children with Hearing Loss or Auditory Processing Issues.

Authors:  Erin C Schafer; Benjamin Kirby; Sharon Miller
Journal:  Semin Hear       Date:  2020-12-16

3.  Developmental effects of multiple looks in speech sound discrimination.

Authors:  Rachael Frush Holt; Arlene Earley Carney
Journal:  J Speech Lang Hear Res       Date:  2007-12       Impact factor: 2.297

4.  Effects of reverberation on speech recognition in stationary and modulated noise by school-aged children and young adults.

Authors:  Marcin Wróblewski; Dawna E Lewis; Daniel L Valente; Patricia G Stelmachowicz
Journal:  Ear Hear       Date:  2012 Nov-Dec       Impact factor: 3.570

5.  Individual differences in language and working memory affect children's speech recognition in noise.

Authors:  Ryan W McCreery; Meredith Spratford; Benjamin Kirby; Marc Brennan
Journal:  Int J Audiol       Date:  2016-12-16       Impact factor: 2.117

6.  Self-monitoring of listening abilities in normal-hearing children, normal-hearing adults, and children with cochlear implants.

Authors:  Ann M Rothpletz; Frederic L Wightman; Doris J Kistler
Journal:  J Am Acad Audiol       Date:  2012-03       Impact factor: 1.664

7.  The effects of limited bandwidth and noise on verbal processing time and word recall in normal-hearing children.

Authors:  Ryan W McCreery; Patricia G Stelmachowicz
Journal:  Ear Hear       Date:  2013-09       Impact factor: 3.570

8.  Linguistic Masking Release in School-Age Children and Adults.

Authors:  Lauren Calandruccio; Lori J Leibold; Emily Buss
Journal:  Am J Audiol       Date:  2016-03       Impact factor: 1.493

9.  Development of Open-Set Word Recognition in Children: Speech-Shaped Noise and Two-Talker Speech Maskers.

Authors:  Nicole E Corbin; Angela Yarnell Bonino; Emily Buss; Lori J Leibold
Journal:  Ear Hear       Date:  2016 Jan-Feb       Impact factor: 3.570

10.  Effect of minimal/mild hearing loss on children's speech understanding in a simulated classroom.

Authors:  Dawna E Lewis; Daniel L Valente; Jody L Spalding
Journal:  Ear Hear       Date:  2015-01       Impact factor: 3.570

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.