Literature DB >> 22274578

Legislation on direct-to-consumer genetic testing in seven European countries.

Pascal Borry1, Rachel E van Hellemondt, Dominique Sprumont, Camilla Fittipaldi Duarte Jales, Emmanuelle Rial-Sebbag, Tade Matthias Spranger, Liam Curren, Jane Kaye, Herman Nys, Heidi Howard.   

Abstract

An increasing number of private companies are now offering direct-to-consumer (DTC) genetic testing services. Although a lot of attention has been devoted to the regulatory framework of DTC genetic testing services in the USA, only limited information about the regulatory framework in Europe is available. We will report on the situation with regard to the national legislation on DTC genetic testing in seven European countries (Belgium, the Netherlands, Switzerland, Portugal, France, Germany, the United Kingdom). The paper will address whether these countries have legislation that specifically address the issue of DTC genetic testing or have relevant laws that is pertinent to the regulatory control of these services in their countries. The findings show that France, Germany, Portugal and Switzerland have specific legislation that defines that genetic tests can only be carried out by a medical doctor after the provision of sufficient information concerning the nature, meaning and consequences of the genetic test and after the consent of the person concerned. In the Netherlands, some DTC genetic tests could fall under legislation that provides the Minister the right to refuse to provide a license to operate if a test is scientifically unsound, not in accordance with the professional medical practice standards or if the expected benefit is not in balance with the (potential) health risks. Belgium and the United Kingdom allow the provision of DTC genetic tests.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22274578      PMCID: PMC3376265          DOI: 10.1038/ejhg.2011.278

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur J Hum Genet        ISSN: 1018-4813            Impact factor:   4.246


  28 in total

1.  A consumer charter for genomic services.

Authors:  Fred Ledley
Journal:  Nat Biotechnol       Date:  2002-08       Impact factor: 54.908

2.  Blurring lines. The research activities of direct-to-consumer genetic testing companies raise questions about consumers as research subjects.

Authors:  Heidi C Howard; Bartha Maria Knoppers; Pascal Borry
Journal:  EMBO Rep       Date:  2010-07-16       Impact factor: 8.807

3.  Regulating direct-to-consumer genetic testing: protecting the consumer without quashing a medical revolution.

Authors:  Jennifer A Gniady
Journal:  Fordham Law Rev       Date:  2008-04

Review 4.  The current landscape for direct-to-consumer genetic testing: legal, ethical, and policy issues.

Authors:  Stuart Hogarth; Gail Javitt; David Melzer
Journal:  Annu Rev Genomics Hum Genet       Date:  2008       Impact factor: 8.929

5.  ACOG Committee Opinion No. 409: Direct-to-consumer marketing of genetic testing.

Authors: 
Journal:  Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2008-06       Impact factor: 7.661

6.  Implications of genetic testing for health policy.

Authors:  Gregory Katz; Stuart O Schweitzer
Journal:  Yale J Health Policy Law Ethics       Date:  2010

7.  Personal genome testing: do you know what you are buying?

Authors:  Heidi C Howard; Pascal Borry
Journal:  Am J Bioeth       Date:  2009       Impact factor: 11.229

8.  Social networkers' attitudes toward direct-to-consumer personal genome testing.

Authors:  Amy L McGuire; Christina M Diaz; Tao Wang; Susan G Hilsenbeck
Journal:  Am J Bioeth       Date:  2009       Impact factor: 11.229

9.  Convention for the protection of human rights and dignity of the human being with regard to the application of biology and medicine: convention on human rights and biomedicine (adopted by the Committee of Ministers on 19 November 1996). Council of Europe Convention of Biomedicine.

Authors: 
Journal:  Hum Reprod       Date:  1997-09       Impact factor: 6.918

10.  Health-related direct-to-consumer genetic testing: a review of companies' policies with regard to genetic testing in minors.

Authors:  Pascal Borry; Heidi C Howard; Karine Sénécal; Denise Avard
Journal:  Fam Cancer       Date:  2009-06-02       Impact factor: 2.375

View more
  39 in total

1.  Neither as harmful as feared by critics nor as empowering as promised by providers: risk information offered direct to consumer by personal genomics companies.

Authors:  Anders Nordgren
Journal:  J Community Genet       Date:  2012-04-05

2.  Case Report: Direct Access Genetic Testing and A False-Positive Result For Long QT Syndrome.

Authors:  Sarah Predham; Sara Hamilton; Alison M Elliott; William T Gibson
Journal:  J Genet Couns       Date:  2015-08-30       Impact factor: 2.537

3.  Captious certainties: makings, meanings and misreadings of consumer-oriented genetic testing.

Authors:  Norbert W Paul; Mita Banerjee; Susanne Michl
Journal:  J Community Genet       Date:  2013-11-08

4.  To ban or not to ban? Clinical geneticists' views on the regulation of direct-to-consumer genetic testing.

Authors:  Heidi Carmen Howard; Pascal Borry
Journal:  EMBO Rep       Date:  2012-08-14       Impact factor: 8.807

5.  Awareness, attitudes and perspectives of direct-to-consumer genetic testing in Greece: a survey of potential consumers.

Authors:  Vasiliki Mavroidopoulou; Ellie Xera; Vasiliki Mollaki
Journal:  J Hum Genet       Date:  2015-06-04       Impact factor: 3.172

6.  Genomic analysis in the clinic: benefits and challenges for health care professionals and patients in Brazil.

Authors:  Patrícia Ashton-Prolla; José Roberto Goldim; Filippo Pinto E Vairo; Ursula da Silveira Matte; Jorge Sequeiros
Journal:  J Community Genet       Date:  2015-06-04

Review 7.  The perspective from EASAC and FEAM on direct-to-consumer genetic testing for health-related purposes.

Authors:  Robin Fears; Volker ter Meulen
Journal:  Eur J Hum Genet       Date:  2012-11-21       Impact factor: 4.246

8.  The challenge of personal genomics in Germany.

Authors:  Effy Vayena; Barbara Prainsack
Journal:  Nat Biotechnol       Date:  2013-01       Impact factor: 54.908

9.  Communication is the key. : Part 2 : Direct to consumer genetics in our future daily life ?

Authors:  Bernard Perbal
Journal:  J Cell Commun Signal       Date:  2014-11-19       Impact factor: 5.782

10.  Harm, hype and evidence: ELSI research and policy guidance.

Authors:  Timothy Caulfield; Subhashini Chandrasekharan; Yann Joly; Robert Cook-Deegan
Journal:  Genome Med       Date:  2013-03-26       Impact factor: 11.117

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.