Literature DB >> 23169492

The perspective from EASAC and FEAM on direct-to-consumer genetic testing for health-related purposes.

Robin Fears1, Volker ter Meulen.   

Abstract

Direct-to-consumer (DTC) genetic testing services raise scientific, regulatory and ethical questions. A report was prepared by consultation with an expert Working Group and published by the academies of science (European Academies of Science Advisory Council, EASAC) and medicine (Federation of European Academies of Medicine, FEAM). This report reviews current scientific evidence, ascertains the principles that should underpin the options for action by policy-makers, and discusses the potential for devising proportionate and flexible regulation that enables future innovation, taking account of the work of other expert groups, most notably the European Society of Human Genetics. EASAC-FEAM concluded that DTC genetic testing has little clinical value at present, and expresses especial caution in several specific respects, for example relating to testing for high penetrance, serious disorders, prenatal screening, nutrigenomic and pharmacogenetic testing. It was emphasised that regulation must be on the basis that claims about the link between genetic marker and disease are scientifically valid. Other key issues to address include quality assurance (that includes the professional interpretation of results), transparent supply of accurate information, consideration of the implications for established health services, and clarification of consent procedures for any use of data for research purposes. There are important implications: for the European Commission, in revising the Directive on In Vitro Diagnostic Medical Devices; for professional bodies, in supporting training and guideline development; for the broader research community, in generating the evidence base; and for the public health community, in improving the routine translation of research advances into clinical practice.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2012        PMID: 23169492      PMCID: PMC3722941          DOI: 10.1038/ejhg.2012.238

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur J Hum Genet        ISSN: 1018-4813            Impact factor:   4.246


  21 in total

1.  Legislation on direct-to-consumer genetic testing in seven European countries.

Authors:  Pascal Borry; Rachel E van Hellemondt; Dominique Sprumont; Camilla Fittipaldi Duarte Jales; Emmanuelle Rial-Sebbag; Tade Matthias Spranger; Liam Curren; Jane Kaye; Herman Nys; Heidi Howard
Journal:  Eur J Hum Genet       Date:  2012-01-25       Impact factor: 4.246

2.  Genetic horoscopes: is it all in the genes? Points for regulatory control of direct-to-consumer genetic testing.

Authors:  Christine Patch; Jorge Sequeiros; Martina C Cornel
Journal:  Eur J Hum Genet       Date:  2009-03-04       Impact factor: 4.246

3.  Direct-to-consumer genetic testing: good, bad or benign?

Authors:  T Caulfield; N M Ries; P N Ray; C Shuman; B Wilson
Journal:  Clin Genet       Date:  2009-11-21       Impact factor: 4.438

Review 4.  Ethical and social issues in pharmacogenomics testing.

Authors:  S J H Vijverberg; T Pieters; M C Cornel
Journal:  Curr Pharm Des       Date:  2010       Impact factor: 3.116

5.  Building the sequence map of the human pan-genome.

Authors:  Ruiqiang Li; Yingrui Li; Hancheng Zheng; Ruibang Luo; Hongmei Zhu; Qibin Li; Wubin Qian; Yuanyuan Ren; Geng Tian; Jinxiang Li; Guangyu Zhou; Xuan Zhu; Honglong Wu; Junjie Qin; Xin Jin; Dongfang Li; Hongzhi Cao; Xueda Hu; Hélène Blanche; Howard Cann; Xiuqing Zhang; Songgang Li; Lars Bolund; Karsten Kristiansen; Huanming Yang; Jun Wang; Jian Wang
Journal:  Nat Biotechnol       Date:  2009-12-07       Impact factor: 54.908

6.  Genetic education and the challenge of genomic medicine: development of core competences to support preparation of health professionals in Europe.

Authors:  Heather Skirton; Celine Lewis; Alastair Kent; Domenico A Coviello
Journal:  Eur J Hum Genet       Date:  2010-05-05       Impact factor: 4.246

7.  Prospective comparison of family medical history with personal genome screening for risk assessment of common cancers.

Authors:  Brandie Heald; Emily Edelman; Charis Eng
Journal:  Eur J Hum Genet       Date:  2012-01-04       Impact factor: 4.246

8.  Statement of the ESHG on direct-to-consumer genetic testing for health-related purposes.

Authors: 
Journal:  Eur J Hum Genet       Date:  2010-08-25       Impact factor: 4.246

9.  Outcomes of interest in evidence-based evaluations of genetic tests.

Authors:  Jeffrey R Botkin; Steven M Teutsch; Celia I Kaye; Maxine Hayes; James E Haddow; Linda A Bradley; Kathleen Szegda; W David Dotson
Journal:  Genet Med       Date:  2010-04       Impact factor: 8.822

10.  A standardized framework for the validation and verification of clinical molecular genetic tests.

Authors:  Christopher J Mattocks; Michael A Morris; Gert Matthijs; Elfriede Swinnen; Anniek Corveleyn; Els Dequeker; Clemens R Müller; Victoria Pratt; Andrew Wallace
Journal:  Eur J Hum Genet       Date:  2010-07-28       Impact factor: 4.246

View more
  5 in total

Review 1.  Use of contemporary genetics in cardiovascular diagnosis.

Authors:  Alfred L George
Journal:  Circulation       Date:  2014-11-25       Impact factor: 29.690

2.  Responsible implementation of expanded carrier screening.

Authors:  Lidewij Henneman; Pascal Borry; Davit Chokoshvili; Martina C Cornel; Carla G van El; Francesca Forzano; Alison Hall; Heidi C Howard; Sandra Janssens; Hülya Kayserili; Phillis Lakeman; Anneke Lucassen; Sylvia A Metcalfe; Lovro Vidmar; Guido de Wert; Wybo J Dondorp; Borut Peterlin
Journal:  Eur J Hum Genet       Date:  2016-03-16       Impact factor: 4.246

Review 3.  Proposed guidelines to evaluate scientific validity and evidence for genotype-based dietary advice.

Authors:  Keith A Grimaldi; Ben van Ommen; Jose M Ordovas; Laurence D Parnell; John C Mathers; Igor Bendik; Lorraine Brennan; Carlos Celis-Morales; Elisa Cirillo; Hannelore Daniel; Brenda de Kok; Ahmed El-Sohemy; Susan J Fairweather-Tait; Rosalind Fallaize; Michael Fenech; Lynnette R Ferguson; Eileen R Gibney; Mike Gibney; Ingrid M F Gjelstad; Jim Kaput; Anette S Karlsen; Silvia Kolossa; Julie Lovegrove; Anna L Macready; Cyril F M Marsaux; J Alfredo Martinez; Fermin Milagro; Santiago Navas-Carretero; Helen M Roche; Wim H M Saris; Iwona Traczyk; Henk van Kranen; Lars Verschuren; Fabio Virgili; Peter Weber; Jildau Bouwman
Journal:  Genes Nutr       Date:  2017-12-15       Impact factor: 5.523

Review 4.  The Evolution of Public Health Genomics: Exploring Its Past, Present, and Future.

Authors:  Caron M Molster; Faye L Bowman; Gemma A Bilkey; Angela S Cho; Belinda L Burns; Kristen J Nowak; Hugh J S Dawkins
Journal:  Front Public Health       Date:  2018-09-04

Review 5.  Ethical issues in the development and implementation of nutrition-related public health policies and interventions: A scoping review.

Authors:  Thierry Hurlimann; Juan Pablo Peña-Rosas; Abha Saxena; Gerardo Zamora; Béatrice Godard
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2017-10-26       Impact factor: 3.240

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.