| Literature DB >> 22233564 |
Tomas Gonec1, Pavel Bobal, Josef Sujan, Matus Pesko, Jiahui Guo, Katarina Kralova, Lenka Pavlacka, Libor Vesely, Eva Kreckova, Jiri Kos, Aidan Coffey, Peter Kollar, Ales Imramovsky, Lukas Placek, Josef Jampilek.
Abstract
In this study, a series of thirty-five substituted quinoline-2-carboxamides and thirty-three substituted naphthalene-2-carboxamides were prepared and characterized. They were tested for their activity related to the inhibition of photosynthetic electron transport (PET) in spinach (Spinacia oleracea L.) chloroplasts. Primary in vitro screening of the synthesized compounds was also performed against four mycobacterial species. N-Cycloheptylquinoline-2-carboxamide, N-cyclohexylquinoline-2-carboxamide and N-(2-phenylethyl)quinoline-2-carboxamide showed higher activity against M. tuberculosis than the standards isoniazid or pyrazinamide and 2-(pyrrolidin-1-ylcarbonyl)quinoline and 1-(2-naphthoyl)pyrrolidine expressed higher activity against M. kansasii and M. avium paratuberculosis than the standards isoniazid or pyrazinamide. The most effective antimycobacterial compounds demonstrated insignificant toxicity against the human monocytic leukemia THP-1 cell line. The PET-inhibiting activity expressed by IC(50) value of the most active compound N-benzyl-2-naphthamide was 7.5 μmol/L. For all compounds, the structure-activity relationships are discussed.Entities:
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2012 PMID: 22233564 PMCID: PMC6268315 DOI: 10.3390/molecules17010613
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Molecules ISSN: 1420-3049 Impact factor: 4.411
Scheme 1Synthesis of quinoline-2-carboxanilides 1–19c and naphthalene-2-carboxamides 20–38c.
The calculated lipophilicities (log P/Clog P), electronic σ parameters and IC50 [μmol/L] values related to PET inhibition in spinach chloroplasts of quinoline-2-carboxamides 1–19c in comparison with 3-(3,4-dichlorophenyl)-1,1-dimethylurea (DCMU) standard. NF = not found in literature, ND = not determined due to precipitation during the experiment or interaction with 2,6-dichlorophenol-indophenol (DCIPP).
| Comp. | R1 | R2 | PET inhibition IC50 [μmol/L] | log
| σ [ |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
| H | ND | 2.02 ± 0.34 | −0.19 [ | |
|
| –C12H25 | H | 573 | 6.98 ± 0.32 | NF |
|
| –(CH2)4– | 1598 | 1.15 ± 0.26 | NF | |
|
| –(CH2)5– | ND | 1.72 ± 0.26 | NF | |
|
| H | 762 | 2.63 ± 0.33 | −0.20 [ | |
|
| H | 1041 | 3.20 ± 0.33 | −0.15 [ | |
|
| H | ND | 3.76 ± 0.33 | NF | |
|
| H | 415 | 4.33 ± 0.33 | NF | |
|
| Ph | H | 85.1 | 2.90 ± 0.34 | 0.60 [ |
|
| Bn | H | 59.4 | 2.91 ± 0.35 | 0.22 [ |
|
| –C2H4Ph | H | ND | 3.33 ± 0.33 | 0.08 [ |
|
| 2-OH-Ph | H | 16.3 | 2.54 ± 0.36 | −0.09 |
|
| 3-OH-Ph | H | ND | 2.55 ± 0.36 | 0.12 |
|
| 4-OH-Ph | H | ND | 2.15 ± 0.35 | −0.37 |
|
| 2-OCH3-Ph | H | ND | 2.80 ± 0.36 | −0.39 [ |
|
| 3-OCH3-Ph | H | ND | 3.06 ± 0.36 | 0.12 |
|
| 4-OCH3-Ph | H | ND | 2.85 ± 0.36 | −0.27 |
|
| 2-CH3-Ph | H | 142.9 | 3.36 ± 0.34 | NF |
|
| 3-CH3-Ph | H | 100.6 | 3.36 ± 0.34 | −0.07 |
|
| 4-CH3-Ph | H | ND | 3.36 ± 0.34 | −0.17 |
|
| 2-F-Ph | H | 98.1 | 2.86 ± 0.44 | 0.24 [ |
|
| 3-F-Ph | H | 86.9 | 3.38 ± 0.44 | 0.34 |
|
| 4-F-Ph | H | 75.3 | 3.34 ± 0.44 | 0.06 |
|
| 2-Cl-Ph | H | 56.3 | 3.41 ± 0.36 | 0.20 [ |
|
| 3-Cl-Ph | H | 91.9 | 3.93 ± 0.37 | 0.37 |
|
| 4-Cl-Ph | H | 147.6 | 3.89 ± 0.36 | 0.23 |
|
| 2-Br-Ph | H | 92.2 | 3.58 ± 0.44 | 0.21 [ |
|
| 3-Br-Ph | H | 409.0 | 4.10 ± 0.44 | 0.39 |
|
| 4-Br-Ph | H | 307.9 | 4.06 ± 0.44 | 0.23 |
|
| 2-CF3-Ph | H | 109.4 | 4.09 ± 0.42 | NF |
|
| 3-CF3-Ph | H | 329.5 | 4.25 ± 0.42 | 0.43 |
|
| 4-CF3-Ph | H | ND | 3.91 ± 0.41 | 0.74 |
|
| 2-NO2-Ph | H | ND | 3.15 ± 0.38 | 0.80 [ |
|
| 3-NO2-Ph | H | ND | 3.28 ± 0.38 | 0.71 |
|
| 4-NO2-Ph | H | ND | 3.36 ± 0.38 | 1.26 |
|
| – | – | 1.9 | – | – |
The calculated lipophilicities (log P/Clog P), electronic σ parameters and IC50 [μmol/L] values related to PET inhibition in spinach chloroplasts of naphthalene-2-carboxamides 20–38c in comparison with 3-(3,4-dichlorophenyl)-1,1-dimethylurea (DCMU) standard. NF = not found in literature, ND = not determined due to precipitation during the experiment or interaction with 2,6-dichlorophenol-indophenol (DCIPP).
| Comp. | R1 | R2 | PET inhibition IC50 [μmol/L] | log
| σ [ |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
| H | 353 | 2.97 ± 0.28 | −0.19 [ | |
|
| –C12H25 | H | 845 | 7.94 ± 0.28 | NF |
|
| –(CH2)4– | ND | 2.10 ± 0.23 | NF | |
|
| –(CH2)5– | ND | 2.67 ± 0.23 | NF | |
|
| H | ND | 3.59 ± 0.28 | −0.20 [ | |
|
| H | ND | 4.15 ± 0.28 | −0.15 [ | |
|
| H | 216 | 4.21 ± 0.28 | NF | |
|
| H | 688 | 5.28 ± 0.28 | NF | |
|
| Ph | H | 20.7 | 3.85 ± 0.29 | 0.60 [ |
|
| Bn | H | 7.5 | 3.87 ± 0.28 | 0.22 [ |
|
| –C2H4Ph | H | ND | 4.28 ± 0.29 | 0.08 [ |
|
| 3-OH-Ph | H | ND | 3.50 ± 0.31 | 0.12 |
|
| 4-OH-Ph | H | ND | 3.11 ± 0.30 | −0.37 |
|
| 2-OCH3-Ph | H | 763.0 | 3.75 ± 0.32 | −0.39 [ |
|
| 3-OCH3-Ph | H | 306.2 | 4.01 ± 0.32 | 0.12 |
|
| 4-OCH3-Ph | H | ND | 3.80 ± 0.32 | −0.27 |
|
| 2-CH3-Ph | H | ND | 4.31 ± 0.30 | NF |
|
| 3-CH3-Ph | H | ND | 4.31 ± 0.30 | −0.07 |
|
| 4-CH3-Ph | H | ND | 4.31 ± 0.30 | −0.17 |
|
| 2-F-Ph | H | ND | 3.82 ± 0.40 | 0.24 [ |
|
| 3-F-Ph | H | ND | 4.34 ± 0.41 | 0.34 |
|
| 4-F-Ph | H | ND | 4.30 ± 0.41 | 0.06 |
|
| 2-Cl-Ph | H | ND | 4.36 ± 0.32 | 0.20 [ |
|
| 3-Cl-Ph | H | 81.0 | 4.88 ± 0.33 | 0.37 |
|
| 4-Cl-Ph | H | ND | 4.84 ± 0.32 | 0.23 |
|
| 2-Br-Ph | H | ND | 4.54 ± 0.40 | 0.21 [ |
|
| 3-Br-Ph | H | 102.8 | 5.06 ± 0.41 | 0.39 |
|
| 4-Br-Ph | H | ND | 5.02 ± 0.41 | 0.23 |
|
| 3-CF3-Ph | H | 309.4 | 5.20 ± 0.39 | 0.43 |
|
| 4-CF3-Ph | H | ND | 4.86 ± 0.37 | 0.74 |
|
| 2-NO2-Ph | H | ND | 4.10 ± 0.34 | 0.80 [ |
|
| 3-NO2-Ph | H | 633.3 | 4.24 ± 0.34 | 0.71 |
|
| 4-NO2-Ph | H | 260.0 | 4.31 ± 0.34 | 1.26 |
|
| – | – | 1.9 | – | – |
In vitro antimycobacterial activity (IC90) of compounds 1–3, 5–7, 11, 14b, 22 and 32a in comparison with standards isoniazid (INH) and pyrazinamide (PZA), in vitro cytotoxicity assay (LD50) of compounds 3, 7, 11 and 22 and calculated selectivity index (SI). ND = not determined; used IC90 for calculation of SI is marked by *.
| Comp. | MIC/IC90 [µmol/L] | LD50 [µmol/L] | SI [LD50/IC90] | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
|
| ||||||
| 280 | 583 | 1167 | 1167 | ND | – | ||
| 367 | 367 | 734 | 734 | ND | – | ||
| 552 | 552 | 111 * | 111 * | >100 | >0.90 | ||
| 491 | 491 | 491 | 491 | ND | – | ||
| 125 | 520 | 520 | 520 | ND | – | ||
| 111 * | 466 | 223 | 466 | 62 ± 4.5 | 0.56 | ||
| 109 * | 452 | 905 | 452 | >100 | >0.92 | ||
| 469 | 469 | 939 | 469 | ND | – | ||
| 554 | 554 | 111 * | 111 * | >100 | >0.90 | ||
| 901 | 451 | 216 | 451 | ND | – | ||
| >729 | <72.9 | >729 | <72.9 | ND | – | ||
| >812 | >812 | >812 | >812 | ND | – | ||
Clinical isolate of M. tuberculosis CUH071 (Cork University Hospital TB lab), with partial INH and PZA resistance.
Figure 1Relationships between PET inhibition log (1/IC50) [mol/L] in spinach chloroplasts and lipophilicity (a) or N-substituent electronic σ parameters (b) of studied compounds 1–10.
Figure 2Relationships between PET inhibition log (1/IC50) [mol/L] in spinach chloroplasts and lipophilicity (a) or N-substituent electronic Hammett’s σ parameters (b) of studied compounds 9, 12a–19c.
Figure 3Relationships between PET-inhibition log (1/IC50) [mol/L] in spinach chloroplasts and lipophilicity (a, b) or N-substituent electronic σ parameters (c) of studied naphthalene-2-carboxamides 20–38c.
Figure 4Dependence of in vitro average antimycobacterial activity against Mycobacterium sp. (log 1/MIC [mol/L]) on lipophilicity expressed as log P of the studied quinaldinamides. (red rhomb = branched alkyl quinaldinamides, green triangle = unbranched long-chain alkyl quinaldinamide, blue square = aromatic quinaldinamides, black point = naphtamides).