| Literature DB >> 21072023 |
Jan Otevrel1, Zuzana Mandelova, Matus Pesko, Jiahui Guo, Katarina Kralova, Frantisek Sersen, Marcela Vejsova, Danuta S Kalinowski, Zaklina Kovacevic, Aidan Coffey, Jozef Csollei, Des R Richardson, Josef Jampilek.
Abstract
In this study, a series of twelve ring-substituted salicylanilides and carbamoylphenylcarbamates were prepared and characterized. The compounds were analyzed using RP-HPLC to determine lipophilicity. They were tested for their activity related to the inhibition of photosynthetic electron transport (PET) in spinach (Spinacia oleracea L.) chloroplasts. Moreover, their site of action in the photosynthetic apparatus was determined. Primary in vitro screening of the synthesized compounds was also performed against mycobacterial, bacterial and fungal strains. Several compounds showed biological activity comparable with or higher than the standards 3-(3,4-dichlorophenyl)-1,1-dimethylurea, isoniazid, penicillin G, ciprofloxacin or fluconazole. The most active compounds showed minimal anti-proliferative activity against human cells in culture, indicating they would have low cytotoxicity. For all compounds, the relationships between lipophilicity and the chemical structure are discussed.Entities:
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2010 PMID: 21072023 PMCID: PMC6259458 DOI: 10.3390/molecules15118122
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Molecules ISSN: 1420-3049 Impact factor: 4.411
Scheme 1Synthesis of the studied compounds.
Comparison of the calculated lipophilicities (log P/Clog P) with the determined log k values, Hammett’s parameter (σ) and bulk parameter (MR, reflecting bulkiness).
| 2-OH | 0.6661 | 2.94 / 3.1212 | 3.73 ± 0.37 | 0.10 | 4.7 | ||
| 2-OH | 0.6807 | 3.42 / 2.9702 | 4.19 ± 0.38 | 0.20 | 9.4 | ||
| 2-OH | 0.6770 | 2.32 / 2.7576 | 3.17 ± 0.39 | 0.00 | 6.5 | ||
| 2-OH | 0.7515 | 2.66 / 3.2866 | 3.70 ± 0.39 | 0.02 | 11.3 | ||
| 2-OH | 0.8401 | 3.15 / 3.8156 | 4.23 ± 0.39 | NF | 15.9 | ||
| 4-NO2 | 0.6782 | 3.15 / 2.7782 | 3.19 ± 0.34 | 0.67 | 4.7 | ||
| 4-NO2 | 0.6966 | 2.82 / 3.7170 | 3.19 ± 0.35 | 0.67 | 4.7 | ||
| 4-NO2 | 0.8269 | 4.13 / 3.7726 | 4.94 ± 0.43 | 1.10 | 8.7 | ||
| 4-NH2 | 0.5886 | 2.66 / 2.6350 | 2.47 ± 0.39 | 0.67 | 4.7 | ||
| 4-NH2 | ND | 3.52 / 3.0299 | 4.12 ± 0.42 | 1.10 | 8.7 | ||
| 4-CH3OCONH | 0.6345 | 2.96 / 3.2510 | 3.21 ± 0.43 | 0.67 | 4.7 | ||
| 4-CH3OCONH | 0.7782 | 3.81 / 3.6459 | 4.86 ± 0.50 | 1.10 | 8.7 | ||
NF = not found in literature; ND = not determined/analyzed.
Figure 1Comparison of the log P data calculated using the two programs with the experimentally found log k values. The compounds are arranged in the ascending manner according to the experimental log k values.
IC50 values of compounds 1-11, 13 and 14 related to photosynthetic electron transport (PET) inhibition in spinach chloroplasts in comparison with the 3-(3,4-dichlorophenyl)-1,1-dimethylurea (DCMU) standard; in vitro anti-fungal and anti-bacterial activity (IC50/IC90) of compounds 1-5 compared with the fluconazole (FLU), penicillin G (PEN), ciprofloxacin (CPF) standards and the anti-mycobacterial activity (IC90) of compound 1 in comparison with the standard isoniazid (INH).
| Comp. | PET inhibition | MIC [µmol/L] | MIC/IC90 [µg/mL] | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| AC | TM | MRSA | SE | MAC | MAP | MK | ||
| 2.7 | 62.50 | 62.50 | 125 | 125 | 250 | 250 | 125 | |
| 331.4 | >250 | 250 | >500 | >500 | NA | NA | NA | |
| 1.6 | 125 | 125 | 500 | >500 | NA | NA | NA | |
| 15.0 | 62.50 | 62.50 | 125 | 125 | NA | NA | NA | |
| 44.8 | 31.25 | 31.25 | 31.25 | 31.25 | NA | NA | NA | |
| 50.1 | NA | NA | NA | NA | NA | NA | NA | |
| 398.4 | NA | NA | NA | NA | NA | NA | NA | |
| 1.6 | NA | NA | NA | NA | NA | NA | NA | |
| 1.0 | NA | NA | NA | NA | NA | NA | NA | |
| 1.9 | – | – | – | – | – | – | – | |
| – | >125 | 1.95 | – | – | – | – | – | |
| – | – | – | 125 | 31.62 | ||||
| – | – | – | 500 | 250 | ||||
| – | – | – | – | – | <10 | >250 | <10 | |
MIC determination (MIC: minimum inhibitory concentration): moulds-fungi (IC50 value), bacteria (IC90 value), NA = no significant activity, AC: Absidia corymbifera, TM: Trichophyton mentagrophytes, MRSA: methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus, SE: Staphylococcus epidermidis, MAC: Mycobacterium avium complex, MAP: M. avium paratuberculosis, MK: M. kansasii).
Figure 2EPR spectra of control chloroplasts (A) and chloroplasts treated with 0.05 M of compound 3 (B). Full lines were recorded in darkness. Dotted lines were recorded under irradiation (~400 μE/m2s PAR) directly in the resonance cavity with a 250 W halogen lamp from 0.5 m distance through a 5 cm water filter.