Literature DB >> 19061108

Public expectations for return of results from large-cohort genetic research.

Juli Murphy1, Joan Scott, David Kaufman, Gail Geller, Lisa LeRoy, Kathy Hudson.   

Abstract

The National Institutes of Health and other federal health agencies are considering establishing a national biobank to study the roles of genes and environment in human health. A preliminary public engagement study was conducted to assess public attitudes and concerns about the proposed biobank, including the expectations for return of individual research results. A total of 141 adults of different ages, incomes, genders, ethnicities, and races participated in 16 focus groups in six locations across the country. Focus group participants voiced a strong desire to be able to access individual research results. Recognizing the wide range of possible research results from a large cohort study, they repeatedly and spontaneously suggested that cohort study participants be given ongoing choices as to which results they received.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2008        PMID: 19061108      PMCID: PMC2682364          DOI: 10.1080/15265160802513093

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Bioeth        ISSN: 1526-5161            Impact factor:   11.229


  32 in total

1.  Informing clinical trial participants about study results.

Authors:  Ann H Partridge; Eric P Winer
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  2002-07-17       Impact factor: 56.272

2.  The debate over research on stored biological samples: what do sources think?

Authors:  Dave Wendler; Ezekiel Emanuel
Journal:  Arch Intern Med       Date:  2002-07-08

3.  Informed consent and biobanks: a population-based study of attitudes towards tissue donation for genetic research.

Authors:  Klaus Hoeyer; Bert-Ove Olofsson; Tom Mjörndal; Niels Lynöe
Journal:  Scand J Public Health       Date:  2004       Impact factor: 3.021

4.  The Strong Heart Study. A study of cardiovascular disease in American Indians: design and methods.

Authors:  E T Lee; T K Welty; R Fabsitz; L D Cowan; N A Le; A J Oopik; A J Cucchiara; P J Savage; B V Howard
Journal:  Am J Epidemiol       Date:  1990-12       Impact factor: 4.897

5.  So what are we going to do about research using clinical information and samples?

Authors:  Ellen Wright Clayton
Journal:  IRB       Date:  2004 Nov-Dec

6.  Letting the genome out of the bottle--will we get our wish?

Authors:  David J Hunter; Muin J Khoury; Jeffrey M Drazen
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2008-01-10       Impact factor: 91.245

7.  Informed consent for population-based research involving genetics.

Authors:  L M Beskow; W Burke; J F Merz; P A Barr; S Terry; V B Penchaszadeh; L O Gostin; M Gwinn; M J Khoury
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  2001-11-14       Impact factor: 56.272

8.  Active and passive cigarette smoking and the risk of cervical neoplasia.

Authors:  Cornelia L Trimble; Jeanine M Genkinger; Alyce E Burke; Sandra C Hoffman; Kathy J Helzlsouer; Marie Diener-West; George W Comstock; Anthony J Alberg
Journal:  Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2005-01       Impact factor: 7.661

Review 9.  Ethical, legal, and social implications of biobanks for genetics research.

Authors:  Susanne B Haga; Laura M Beskow
Journal:  Adv Genet       Date:  2008       Impact factor: 1.944

10.  Ethical implications of including children in a large biobank for genetic-epidemiologic research: a qualitative study of public opinion.

Authors:  David Kaufman; Gail Geller; Lisa Leroy; Juli Murphy; Joan Scott; Kathy Hudson
Journal:  Am J Med Genet C Semin Med Genet       Date:  2008-02-15       Impact factor: 3.908

View more
  146 in total

1.  Research participants' perspectives on genotype-driven research recruitment.

Authors:  Laura M Beskow; Emily E Namey; R Jean Cadigan; Tracy Brazg; Julia Crouch; Gail E Henderson; Marsha Michie; Daniel K Nelson; Holly K Tabor; Benjamin S Wilfond
Journal:  J Empir Res Hum Res Ethics       Date:  2011-12       Impact factor: 1.742

2.  The meaning of genetic research results: reflections from individuals with and without a known genetic disorder.

Authors:  R Jean Cadigan; Marsha Michie; Gail Henderson; Arlene M Davis; Laura M Beskow
Journal:  J Empir Res Hum Res Ethics       Date:  2011-12       Impact factor: 1.742

3.  Biobank Recruitment: Motivations for Nonparticipation.

Authors:  Katrina A B Goddard; K Sabina Smith; Chuhe Chen; Carmit McMullen; Cheryl Johnson
Journal:  Biopreserv Biobank       Date:  2009-06       Impact factor: 2.300

4.  Disclosing pathogenic genetic variants to research participants: quantifying an emerging ethical responsibility.

Authors:  Christopher A Cassa; Sarah K Savage; Patrick L Taylor; Robert C Green; Amy L McGuire; Kenneth D Mandl
Journal:  Genome Res       Date:  2012-01-06       Impact factor: 9.043

5.  Considerations in the construction of an instrument to assess attitudes regarding critical illness gene variation research.

Authors:  Bradley D Freeman; Carie R Kennedy; Dragana Bolcic-Jankovic; Alexander Eastman; Ellen Iverson; Erica Shehane; Aaron Celious; Jennifer Barillas; Brian Clarridge
Journal:  J Empir Res Hum Res Ethics       Date:  2012-02       Impact factor: 1.742

6.  Engaging African-Americans about biobanks and the return of research results.

Authors:  Colin Me Halverson; Lainie Friedman Ross
Journal:  J Community Genet       Date:  2012-03-28

7.  Preferences Regarding Return of Genomic Results to Relatives of Research Participants, Including after Participant Death: Empirical Results from a Cancer Biobank.

Authors:  Carmen Radecki Breitkopf; Gloria M Petersen; Susan M Wolf; Kari G Chaffee; Marguerite E Robinson; Deborah R Gordon; Noralane M Lindor; Barbara A Koenig
Journal:  J Law Med Ethics       Date:  2015       Impact factor: 1.718

8.  In Different Voices: The Views of People with Disabilities about Return of Results from Precision Medicine Research.

Authors:  Maya Sabatello; Yuan Zhang; Ying Chen; Paul S Appelbaum
Journal:  Public Health Genomics       Date:  2020-04-15       Impact factor: 2.000

9.  Broad Consent for Research on Biospecimens: The Views of Actual Donors at Four U.S. Medical Centers.

Authors:  Teddy D Warner; Carol J Weil; Christopher Andry; Howard B Degenholtz; Lisa Parker; Latarsha J Carithers; Michelle Feige; David Wendler; Rebecca D Pentz
Journal:  J Empir Res Hum Res Ethics       Date:  2018-02-01       Impact factor: 1.742

10.  Disclosure of genetic research results to members of a founder population.

Authors:  Rebecca L Anderson; Kathleen Murray; Jessica X Chong; Rebecca Ouwenga; Marina Antillon; Peixian Chen; Lorena Diaz de Leon; Kathryn J Swoboda; Lucille A Lester; Soma Das; Carole Ober; Darrel J Waggoner
Journal:  J Genet Couns       Date:  2014-04-29       Impact factor: 2.537

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.