Literature DB >> 15358847

Radiation dose and image quality in pediatric CT: effect of technical factors and phantom size and shape.

Marilyn J Siegel1, Bernhard Schmidt, David Bradley, Christoph Suess, Charles Hildebolt.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: To evaluate effects of varying tube current and voltage on radiation dose, image noise, and image contrast with different phantom sizes and shapes.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: Four round lucite phantoms with 8-32-cm diameters were scanned with multi-detector row computed tomography (CT) and 80-120 kVp. Radiation dose was based on CT dose index, image noise, and iodine contrast and measured with constant and variable tube currents that were age appropriate for each tube voltage. Radiation dose and image noise and contrast were compared in round and oval 24-cm phantoms. For various combinations of technical factors and phantom sizes and shapes, percentage differences were calculated for radiation dose and image noise and contrast. Associations between tube voltage and radiation dose, image noise, and image contrast in round and oval phantoms were determined by fitting second-degree polynomials to data. Differences in radiation dose and image noise and contrast, which were attributable to differences in tube voltage, were tested with paired t tests.
RESULTS: With 165-mAs tube current, radiation doses with 140- and 80-kVp tube voltages were 103% ([41.9 mGy - 20.6 mGy]/20.6 mGy) and 58% ([10.2 mGy - 4.2 mGy]/10.1 mGy) higher in the 8-cm phantom than in the 32-cm phantom. When tube current was adapted for phantom size, radiation dose at 80 kVp in the 8-cm phantom was reduced by 82% ([10.1 mGy - 1.8 mGy]/10.1 mGy). In the 8-cm phantom, tube voltage was decreased from 120 to 80 kVp and tube current remained at 165 mAs, resulting in a 68% noise increase ([3.1 HU - 1.8 HU]/1.8 HU). With variable tube current, 80-kVp tube voltage in the 8-cm phantom led to a 138% noise increase ([7.3 HU - 3.1 HU]/3.1 HU). With reduced tube voltage, image contrast increased. In the 8-cm phantom, with a constant 165-mAs tube current and a decrease in tube voltage from 120 to 80 kVp, there was a 35% ([333 HU - 217 HU]/333 HU) increase in contrast. No difference was noted in radiation dose or noise between round and oval phantoms (P = .604 and P = .06, respectively), but a small statistically significant difference (1%) in contrast attenuation was demonstrated (P = .025).
CONCLUSION: Reduced tube voltage for pediatric contrast material-enhanced CT reduces radiation dose and maintains image contrast. Image noise increases, but the effect is minimal in smaller phantoms. An additional reduction in tube current further reduces radiation dose.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2004        PMID: 15358847     DOI: 10.1148/radiol.2332032107

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Radiology        ISSN: 0033-8419            Impact factor:   11.105


  72 in total

1.  Virtual monochromatic imaging in dual-source dual-energy CT: radiation dose and image quality.

Authors:  Lifeng Yu; Jodie A Christner; Shuai Leng; Jia Wang; Joel G Fletcher; Cynthia H McCollough
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2011-12       Impact factor: 4.071

2.  Achieving routine submillisievert CT scanning: report from the summit on management of radiation dose in CT.

Authors:  Cynthia H McCollough; Guang Hong Chen; Willi Kalender; Shuai Leng; Ehsan Samei; Katsuyuki Taguchi; Ge Wang; Lifeng Yu; Roderic I Pettigrew
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  2012-06-12       Impact factor: 11.105

3.  Automatic tube current modulation technique for multidetector CT: is it effective with a 64-detector CT?

Authors:  Yoshinori Funama; Kazuo Awai; Masahiro Hatemura; Masamitchi Shimamura; Yumi Yanaga; Seitaro Oda; Yasuyuki Yamashita
Journal:  Radiol Phys Technol       Date:  2007-11-01

4.  Radiation dose reduction in computed tomography: techniques and future perspective.

Authors:  Lifeng Yu; Xin Liu; Shuai Leng; James M Kofler; Juan C Ramirez-Giraldo; Mingliang Qu; Jodie Christner; Joel G Fletcher; Cynthia H McCollough
Journal:  Imaging Med       Date:  2009-10

5.  Image quality and dose optimisation for infant CT using a paediatric phantom.

Authors:  Jack W Lambert; Andrew S Phelps; Jesse L Courtier; Robert G Gould; John D MacKenzie
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2015-08-26       Impact factor: 5.315

6.  Evaluation of different keV-settings in dual-energy CT angiography of the aorta using advanced image-based virtual monoenergetic imaging.

Authors:  Martin Beeres; Jesko Trommer; Claudia Frellesen; Nour-Eldin A Nour-Eldin; Jan E Scholtz; Eva Herrmann; Thomas J Vogl; Julian L Wichmann
Journal:  Int J Cardiovasc Imaging       Date:  2015-08-02       Impact factor: 2.357

7.  Development of a low-dose protocol for cone beam CT examinations of the anterior maxilla in children.

Authors:  Jose A Hidalgo Rivas; Keith Horner; Badri Thiruvenkatachari; Jonathan Davies; Chrysoula Theodorakou
Journal:  Br J Radiol       Date:  2015-08-17       Impact factor: 3.039

8.  Quantitative contrast-enhanced computed tomography: is there a need for system calibration?

Authors:  Kenneth A Miles; Helen Young; Sandra L Chica; Peter D Esser
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2006-09-29       Impact factor: 5.315

9.  Optimization of perfusion CT protocol for imaging of extracranial head and neck tumors.

Authors:  Sotirios Bisdas; Chuan Zhi Foo; Choon Hua Thng; Thomas J Vogl; Tong San Koh
Journal:  J Digit Imaging       Date:  2008-05-03       Impact factor: 4.056

10.  CT radiation dose in children: a survey to establish age-based diagnostic reference levels in Switzerland.

Authors:  Francis R Verdun; Daniel Gutierrez; John Paul Vader; Abbas Aroua; Leonor Trinidad Alamo-Maestre; François Bochud; François Gudinchet
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2008-04-04       Impact factor: 5.315

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.