Literature DB >> 22116136

Characterization of optically stimulated luminescence dosemeters to measure organ doses in diagnostic radiology.

A Endo1, T Katoh, I Kobayashi, R Joshi, J Sur, T Okano.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to assess the characteristics of an optically stimulated luminescence dosemeter (OSLD) for use in diagnostic radiology and to apply the OSLD in measuring the organ doses by panoramic radiography.
METHODS: The dose linearity, energy dependency and angular dependency of aluminium oxide-based OSLDs were examined using an X-ray generator to simulate various exposure settings in diagnostic radiology. The organ doses were then measured by inserting the dosemeters into an anthropomorphic phantom while using three panoramic machines.
RESULTS: The dosemeters demonstrated consistent dose linearity (coefficient of variation<1.5%) and no significant energy dependency (coefficient of variation<1.5%) under the applied exposure conditions. They also exhibited negligible angular dependency (≤ 10%). The organ doses of the X-ray as a result of panoramic imaging by three machines were calculated using the dosemeters.
CONCLUSION: OSLDs can be utilized to measure the organ doses in diagnostic radiology. The availability of these dosemeters in strip form proves to be reliably advantageous.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2011        PMID: 22116136      PMCID: PMC3520283          DOI: 10.1259/dmfr/98708146

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Dentomaxillofac Radiol        ISSN: 0250-832X            Impact factor:   2.419


  12 in total

1.  Effective dose from radiation absorbed during a panoramic examination with a new generation machine.

Authors:  R A Danforth; D E Clark
Journal:  Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod       Date:  2000-02

2.  Evaluating two extremity dosemeters based on LiF:Mg,Ti or LiF:Mg,Cu,P.

Authors:  L Z Luo; K J Velbeck; J E Rotunda
Journal:  Radiat Prot Dosimetry       Date:  2002       Impact factor: 0.972

3.  On the advantages and disadvantages of optically stimulated luminescence dosimetry and thermoluminescence dosimetry.

Authors:  S W S McKeever; M Moscovitch
Journal:  Radiat Prot Dosimetry       Date:  2003       Impact factor: 0.972

4.  Dosimetry of two extraoral direct digital imaging devices: NewTom cone beam CT and Orthophos Plus DS panoramic unit.

Authors:  J B Ludlow; L E Davies-Ludlow; S L Brooks
Journal:  Dentomaxillofac Radiol       Date:  2003-07       Impact factor: 2.419

5.  [ESTIMATION OF BONE MARROW FROM RADIOGRAPHY OF X-RAY EXAMINATION].

Authors:  T HASHIZUME; Y KATO; T MARUYAMA; A SHIRAGAI; S MARUYAMA; M TAKIZAWA
Journal:  Nihon Igaku Hoshasen Gakkai Zasshi       Date:  1964-12

6.  Dosimetry of 3 CBCT devices for oral and maxillofacial radiology: CB Mercuray, NewTom 3G and i-CAT.

Authors:  J B Ludlow; L E Davies-Ludlow; S L Brooks; W B Howerton
Journal:  Dentomaxillofac Radiol       Date:  2006-07       Impact factor: 2.419

Review 7.  Optically stimulated luminescence (OSL) dosimetry in medicine.

Authors:  E G Yukihara; S W S McKeever
Journal:  Phys Med Biol       Date:  2008-09-17       Impact factor: 3.609

8.  Radiation dose reduction in direct digital panoramic radiography.

Authors:  Sophia Gavala; Catherine Donta; Kostas Tsiklakis; Argyro Boziari; Vasiliki Kamenopoulou; Harry C Stamatakis
Journal:  Eur J Radiol       Date:  2008-05-02       Impact factor: 3.528

9.  Determination of multislice computed tomography dose index (CTDI) using optically stimulated luminescence technology.

Authors:  Chun Ruan; Eduardo G Yukihara; William J Clouse; Patricia B R Gasparian; Salahuddin Ahmad
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2010-07       Impact factor: 4.071

10.  Characterization of optically stimulated luminescent dosimeters, OSLDs, for clinical dosimetric measurements.

Authors:  Paul A Jursinic
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2007-12       Impact factor: 4.071

View more
  2 in total

1.  A preliminary study to determine the diagnostic reference level using dose-area product for limited-area cone beam CT.

Authors:  A Endo; T Katoh; S B Vasudeva; I Kobayashi; T Okano
Journal:  Dentomaxillofac Radiol       Date:  2013-02-18       Impact factor: 2.419

2.  Thyroid Radiation Dose to Patients from Diagnostic Radiology Procedures over Eight Decades: 1930-2010.

Authors:  Lienard A Chang; Donald L Miller; Choonsik Lee; Dunstana R Melo; Daphnée Villoing; Vladimir Drozdovitch; Isabelle Thierry-Chef; Sarah J Winters; Michael Labrake; Charles F Myers; Hyeyeun Lim; Cari M Kitahara; Martha S Linet; Steven L Simon
Journal:  Health Phys       Date:  2017-12       Impact factor: 1.316

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.