Literature DB >> 14565734

On the advantages and disadvantages of optically stimulated luminescence dosimetry and thermoluminescence dosimetry.

S W S McKeever1, M Moscovitch.   

Abstract

The use of thermoluminescence as a method for the dosimetry of ionising radiation has been established for many decades and has been unquestionably successful. It is therefore difficult to imagine how any new technique could easily supplant it. Perhaps optically stimulated luminescence dosimetry should not be characterised as an entirely new technique, but rather a development of the well established technology that may be considered superior in some respects. As is obvious from the tenor of this debate, our two participants are longtime colleagues who have had numerous discussions on this topic. No doubt, many of us will have similar discussions in our own institutions as we weigh the advantages and disadvantages of TLD versus OSL.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2003        PMID: 14565734     DOI: 10.1093/oxfordjournals.rpd.a006191

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Radiat Prot Dosimetry        ISSN: 0144-8420            Impact factor:   0.972


  11 in total

1.  Characterization of optically stimulated luminescence dosemeters to measure organ doses in diagnostic radiology.

Authors:  A Endo; T Katoh; I Kobayashi; R Joshi; J Sur; T Okano
Journal:  Dentomaxillofac Radiol       Date:  2011-11-24       Impact factor: 2.419

2.  A method to acquire CT organ dose map using OSL dosimeters and ATOM anthropomorphic phantoms.

Authors:  Da Zhang; Xinhua Li; Yiming Gao; X George Xu; Bob Liu
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2013-08       Impact factor: 4.071

3.  A preliminary study to determine the diagnostic reference level using dose-area product for limited-area cone beam CT.

Authors:  A Endo; T Katoh; S B Vasudeva; I Kobayashi; T Okano
Journal:  Dentomaxillofac Radiol       Date:  2013-02-18       Impact factor: 2.419

4.  In vitro dose measurements in a human cadaver with abdomen/pelvis CT scans.

Authors:  Da Zhang; Atul Padole; Xinhua Li; Sarabjeet Singh; Ranish Deedar Ali Khawaja; Diego Lira; Tianyu Liu; Jim Q Shi; Alexi Otrakji; Mannudeep K Kalra; X George Xu; Bob Liu
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2014-09       Impact factor: 4.071

5.  Energy dependence and angular dependence of an optically stimulated luminescence dosimeter in the mammography energy range.

Authors:  Ai Kawaguchi; Yuta Matsunaga; Shoichi Suzuki; Koichi Chida
Journal:  J Appl Clin Med Phys       Date:  2017-01-24       Impact factor: 2.102

6.  Recent developments of optically stimulated luminescence materials and techniques for radiation dosimetry and clinical applications.

Authors:  A S Pradhan; J I Lee; J L Kim
Journal:  J Med Phys       Date:  2008-07

7.  Optically stimulated luminescent dosimetry for high dose rate brachytherapy.

Authors:  Christopher Jason Tien; Robert Ebeling; Jessica R Hiatt; Bruce Curran; Edward Sternick
Journal:  Front Oncol       Date:  2012-08-06       Impact factor: 6.244

8.  A novel approach towards development of real time chemical dosimetry using pulsating sensor-based instrumentation.

Authors:  N Malathi; P Sahoo; K Praveen; N Murali
Journal:  J Radioanal Nucl Chem       Date:  2013-05-14       Impact factor: 1.371

9.  MgO:Li,Ce,Sm as a high-sensitivity material for Optically Stimulated Luminescence dosimetry.

Authors:  Luiz C Oliveira; Eduardo G Yukihara; Oswaldo Baffa
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2016-04-14       Impact factor: 4.379

10.  NaCl pellets for prospective dosimetry using optically stimulated luminescence: Signal integrity and long-term versus short-term exposure.

Authors:  Lovisa Waldner; Christopher Rääf; Christian Bernhardsson
Journal:  Radiat Environ Biophys       Date:  2020-09-23       Impact factor: 1.925

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.