Literature DB >> 28968349

Thyroid Radiation Dose to Patients from Diagnostic Radiology Procedures over Eight Decades: 1930-2010.

Lienard A Chang1, Donald L Miller, Choonsik Lee, Dunstana R Melo, Daphnée Villoing, Vladimir Drozdovitch, Isabelle Thierry-Chef, Sarah J Winters, Michael Labrake, Charles F Myers, Hyeyeun Lim, Cari M Kitahara, Martha S Linet, Steven L Simon.   

Abstract

This study summarizes and compares estimates of radiation absorbed dose to the thyroid gland for typical patients who underwent diagnostic radiology examinations in the years from 1930 to 2010. The authors estimated the thyroid dose for common examinations, including radiography, mammography, dental radiography, fluoroscopy, nuclear medicine, and computed tomography (CT). For the most part, a clear downward trend in thyroid dose over time for each procedure was observed. Historically, the highest thyroid doses came from the nuclear medicine thyroid scans in the 1960s (630 mGy), full-mouth series dental radiography (390 mGy) in the early years of the use of x rays in dentistry (1930s), and the barium swallow (esophagram) fluoroscopic exam also in the 1930s (140 mGy). Thyroid uptake nuclear medicine examinations and pancreatic scans also gave relatively high doses to the thyroid (64 mGy and 21 mGy, respectively, in the 1960s). In the 21st century, the highest thyroid doses still result from nuclear medicine thyroid scans (130 mGy), but high thyroid doses are also associated with chest/abdomen/pelvis CT scans (18 and 19 mGy for males and females, respectively). Thyroid doses from CT scans did not exhibit the same downward trend as observed for other examinations. The largest thyroid doses from conventional radiography came from cervical spine and skull examinations. Thyroid doses from mammography (which began in the 1960s) were generally a fraction of 1 mGy. The highest average doses to the thyroid from mammography were about 0.42 mGy, with modestly larger doses associated with imaging of breasts with large compressed thicknesses. Thyroid doses from dental radiographic procedures have decreased markedly throughout the decades, from an average of 390 mGy for a full-mouth series in the 1930s to an average of 0.31 mGy today. Upper GI series fluoroscopy examinations resulted in up to two orders of magnitude lower thyroid doses than the barium swallow. There are considerable uncertainties associated with the presented doses, particularly for characterizing exposures of individual identified patients. Nonetheless, the tabulations provide the only comprehensive report on the estimation of typical radiation doses to the thyroid gland from medical diagnostic procedures over eight decades (1930-2010). These data can serve as a resource for epidemiologic studies that evaluate the late health effects of radiation exposure associated with diagnostic radiologic examinations.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2017        PMID: 28968349      PMCID: PMC5677542          DOI: 10.1097/HP.0000000000000723

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Health Phys        ISSN: 0017-9078            Impact factor:   1.316


  120 in total

1.  Effective dose from radiation absorbed during a panoramic examination with a new generation machine.

Authors:  R A Danforth; D E Clark
Journal:  Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod       Date:  2000-02

2.  Radiation organ doses received in a nationwide cohort of U.S. radiologic technologists: methods and findings.

Authors:  Steven L Simon; Dale L Preston; Martha S Linet; Jeremy S Miller; Alice J Sigurdson; Bruce H Alexander; Deukwoo Kwon; R Craig Yoder; Parveen Bhatti; Mark P Little; Preetha Rajaraman; Dunstana Melo; Vladimir Drozdovitch; Robert M Weinstock; Michele M Doody
Journal:  Radiat Res       Date:  2014-10-31       Impact factor: 2.841

Review 3.  Exposing the thyroid to radiation: a review of its current extent, risks, and implications.

Authors:  Bridget Sinnott; Elaine Ron; Arthur B Schneider
Journal:  Endocr Rev       Date:  2010-07-21       Impact factor: 19.871

4.  A comparative study of the effective radiation doses from cone beam computed tomography and plain radiography for sialography.

Authors:  F Jadu; M J Yaffe; E W N Lam
Journal:  Dentomaxillofac Radiol       Date:  2010-07       Impact factor: 2.419

5.  Patient exposures from intraoral radiographic examinations.

Authors:  R W Alcox; W R Jameson
Journal:  J Am Dent Assoc       Date:  1974-03       Impact factor: 3.634

6.  Radiation dosimetry survey of computed tomography systems from ten manufacturers.

Authors:  T B Shope; T J Morgan; C K Showalter; K S Pentlow; L N Rothenberg; D R White; R D Speller
Journal:  Br J Radiol       Date:  1982-01       Impact factor: 3.039

7.  Radiation exposure in dental radiology: a 1998 nationwide survey in Switzerland.

Authors:  A Aroua; I Buchillier-Decka; K Dula; Y Nedjadi; M Perrier; J-P Vader; J-F Valley
Journal:  Dentomaxillofac Radiol       Date:  2004-07       Impact factor: 2.419

8.  A population-based case-control study of thyroid cancer.

Authors:  E Ron; R A Kleinerman; J D Boice; V A LiVolsi; J T Flannery; J F Fraumeni
Journal:  J Natl Cancer Inst       Date:  1987-07       Impact factor: 13.506

9.  Patient radiation doses in upper GI examinations: a comparison between conventional and double-contrast techniques.

Authors:  G Bankvall; T Owman
Journal:  Gastrointest Radiol       Date:  1982

10.  NCICT: a computational solution to estimate organ doses for pediatric and adult patients undergoing CT scans.

Authors:  Choonsik Lee; Kwang Pyo Kim; Wesley E Bolch; Brian E Moroz; Les Folio
Journal:  J Radiol Prot       Date:  2015-11-26       Impact factor: 1.394

View more
  4 in total

1.  Assessment of PCXMC for patients with different body size in chest and abdominal x ray examinations: a Monte Carlo simulation study.

Authors:  David Borrego; Erin M Lowe; Cari M Kitahara; Choonsik Lee
Journal:  Phys Med Biol       Date:  2018-03-21       Impact factor: 3.609

2.  Trends in Estimated Thyroid, Salivary Gland, Brain, and Eye Lens Doses From Intraoral Dental Radiography Over Seven Decades (1940 TO 2009).

Authors:  R C Fontana; E Pasqual; D L Miller; S L Simon; E Cardis; I Thierry-Chef
Journal:  Health Phys       Date:  2020-02       Impact factor: 2.922

Review 3.  Parathyroid Imaging: Past, Present, and Future.

Authors:  Michael A Morris; Babak Saboury; Mark Ahlman; Ashkan A Malayeri; Elizabeth C Jones; Clara C Chen; Corina Millo
Journal:  Front Endocrinol (Lausanne)       Date:  2022-02-25       Impact factor: 5.555

4.  Assessment of thyroid cancer risk associated with radiation dose from personal diagnostic examinations in a cohort study of US radiologic technologists, followed 1983-2014.

Authors:  Mark P Little; Hyeyeun Lim; Melissa C Friesen; Dale L Preston; Michele M Doody; Alice J Sigurdson; Gila Neta; Bruce H Alexander; Lienard A Chang; Elizabeth K Cahoon; Steven L Simon; Martha S Linet; Cari M Kitahara
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2018-05-14       Impact factor: 2.692

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.