Literature DB >> 1490904

Effects of envelope fluctuations on gap detection.

B R Glasberg1, B C Moore.   

Abstract

The inherent fluctuations present in narrowbands of noise may limit the ability to detect gaps in the noise; 'dips' in the noise may be confused with the gap to be detected. For subjects with cochlear hearing loss, loudness recruitment may effectively magnify the fluctuations and this could partly account for the reduced ability to detect gaps in noise bands that is usually found in subjects with cochlear hearing loss. In the present experiments we tested these ideas by processing noise bands to alter the amount of envelope fluctuation. The envelopes of the noise bands were raised to a power, N. Powers greater than 1 result in expansion of the envelope (magnified fluctuations, simulating loudness recruitment), while powers less than 1 result in compression of the envelope (decreased fluctuations). Thresholds for detecting gaps in processed noise bands centered at 1 kHz were measured as a function of noise bandwidth and of N. To prevent the detection of spectral changes introduced by the gap or by the processing, stimuli were either presented in background noise, or at a low sensation level (20 dB). Three normally hearing subjects, two subjects with unilateral cochlear hearing loss and two subjects with bilateral cochlear hearing loss were tested. Gap thresholds generally increased with increasing N. This effect was large for small noise bandwidths (50 Hz or less) and smaller for larger noise bandwidths (200 Hz or more). For both the normal and impaired ears, gap thresholds at narrow bandwidths were improved relative to those for unprocessed noise bands (N = 1) by compressing the envelope fluctuations (N < 1). The results support the idea that fluctuations in narrowband noises affect gap detection, and that loudness recruitment may adversely affect the ability to detect gaps in noise bands. They also show that compression of the fluctuations in the noise can improve gap detection.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1992        PMID: 1490904     DOI: 10.1016/0378-5955(92)90170-r

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Hear Res        ISSN: 0378-5955            Impact factor:   3.208


  21 in total

1.  The influence of hearing-aid compression on forward-masked thresholds for adults with hearing loss.

Authors:  Marc A Brennan; Ryan W McCreery; Walt Jesteadt
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2015-10       Impact factor: 1.840

2.  Gap detection in school-age children and adults: effects of inherent envelope modulation and the availability of cues across frequency.

Authors:  Emily Buss; Joseph W Hall; Heather Porter; John H Grose
Journal:  J Speech Lang Hear Res       Date:  2014-06-01       Impact factor: 2.297

3.  Initial development of a temporal-envelope-preserving nonlinear hearing aid prescription using a genetic algorithm.

Authors:  Andrew T Sabin; Pamela E Souza
Journal:  Trends Amplif       Date:  2013-06

4.  Gap detection in modulated noise: across-frequency facilitation and interference.

Authors:  John H Grose; Emily Buss; Joseph W Hall
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2008-02       Impact factor: 1.840

5.  Effects of compression on speech acoustics, intelligibility, and sound quality.

Authors:  Pamela E Souza
Journal:  Trends Amplif       Date:  2002-12

6.  Level-dependent changes in perception of speech envelope cues.

Authors:  Judy R Dubno; Jayne B Ahlstrom; Xin Wang; Amy R Horwitz
Journal:  J Assoc Res Otolaryngol       Date:  2012-08-08

7.  The effect of noise fluctuation and spectral bandwidth on gap detection.

Authors:  Joseph W Hall; Emily Buss; Erol J Ozmeral; John H Grose
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2016-04       Impact factor: 1.840

8.  Comparing different estimates of cochlear compression in listeners with normal and impaired hearing.

Authors:  Peninah S Rosengard; Andrew J Oxenham; Louis D Braida
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2005-05       Impact factor: 1.840

9.  Temporal modulation transfer functions for listeners with real and simulated hearing loss.

Authors:  Joseph G Desloge; Charlotte M Reed; Louis D Braida; Zachary D Perez; Lorraine A Delhorne
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2011-06       Impact factor: 1.840

Review 10.  Effects of sensorineural hearing loss on temporal coding of narrowband and broadband signals in the auditory periphery.

Authors:  Kenneth S Henry; Michael G Heinz
Journal:  Hear Res       Date:  2013-01-29       Impact factor: 3.208

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.