Literature DB >> 18345842

A variant temporal-masking-curve method for inferring peripheral auditory compression.

Enrique A Lopez-Poveda1, Ana Alves-Pinto.   

Abstract

Recent studies have suggested that the degree of on-frequency peripheral auditory compression is similar for apical and basal cochlear sites and that compression extends to a wider range of frequencies in apical than in basal sites. These conclusions were drawn from the analysis of the slopes of temporal masking curves (TMCs) on the assumption that forward masking decays at the same rate for all probe and masker frequencies. The aim here was to verify this conclusion using a different assumption. TMCs for normal hearing listeners were measured for probe frequencies (f(P)) of 500 and 4000 Hz and for masker frequencies (f(M)) of 0.4, 0.55, and 1.0 times the probe frequency. TMCs were measured for probes of 9 and 15 dB sensation level. The assumption was that given a 6 dB increase in probe level, linear cochlear responses to the maskers should lead to a 6 dB vertical shift of the corresponding TMCs, while compressive responses should lead to bigger shifts. Results were consistent with the conclusions from earlier studies. It is argued that this supports the assumptions of the standard TMC method for inferring compression, at least in normal-hearing listeners.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18345842     DOI: 10.1121/1.2835418

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am        ISSN: 0001-4966            Impact factor:   1.840


  21 in total

1.  Individual differences in behavioral estimates of cochlear nonlinearities.

Authors:  Gayla L Poling; Amy R Horwitz; Jayne B Ahlstrom; Judy R Dubno
Journal:  J Assoc Res Otolaryngol       Date:  2011-09-22

2.  Isoresponse versus isoinput estimates of cochlear filter tuning.

Authors:  Almudena Eustaquio-Martín; Enrique A Lopez-Poveda
Journal:  J Assoc Res Otolaryngol       Date:  2010-11-23

3.  Recovery from on- and off-frequency forward masking in listeners with normal and impaired hearing.

Authors:  Magdalena Wojtczak; Andrew J Oxenham
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2010-07       Impact factor: 1.840

4.  The role of suppression in psychophysical tone-on-tone masking.

Authors:  Joyce Rodríguez; Stephen T Neely; Harisadhan Patra; Judy Kopun; Walt Jesteadt; Hongyang Tan; Michael P Gorga
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2010-01       Impact factor: 1.840

5.  Comparison of distortion-product otoacoustic emission growth rates and slopes of forward-masked psychometric functions.

Authors:  Joyce Rodríguez; Stephen T Neely; Walt Jesteadt; Hongyang Tan; Michael P Gorga
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2011-02       Impact factor: 1.840

6.  Computational modeling of individual differences in behavioral estimates of cochlear nonlinearities.

Authors:  Skyler G Jennings; Jayne B Ahlstrom; Judy R Dubno
Journal:  J Assoc Res Otolaryngol       Date:  2014-09-30

7.  Evaluating the effects of olivocochlear feedback on psychophysical measures of frequency selectivity.

Authors:  Skyler G Jennings; Elizabeth A Strickland
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2012-10       Impact factor: 1.840

8.  Contralateral efferent reflex effects on threshold and suprathreshold psychoacoustical tuning curves at low and high frequencies.

Authors:  Enzo Aguilar; Almudena Eustaquio-Martin; Enrique A Lopez-Poveda
Journal:  J Assoc Res Otolaryngol       Date:  2013-02-20

9.  Behavioral measures of cochlear compression and temporal resolution as predictors of speech masking release in hearing-impaired listeners.

Authors:  Melanie J Gregan; Peggy B Nelson; Andrew J Oxenham
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2013-10       Impact factor: 1.840

10.  Auditory filter tuning inferred with short sinusoidal and notched-noise maskers.

Authors:  Skyler G Jennings; Elizabeth A Strickland
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2012-10       Impact factor: 1.840

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.