Literature DB >> 20957507

Using the cochlear microphonic as a tool to evaluate cochlear function in mouse models of hearing.

Mary Ann Cheatham1, Khurram Naik, Peter Dallos.   

Abstract

The cochlear microphonic (CM) can be a useful analytical tool, but many investigators may not be fully familiar with its unique properties to interpret it accurately in mouse models of hearing. The purpose of this report is to develop a model for generation of the CM in wild-type (WT) and prestin knockout mice. Data and modeling results indicate that in the majority of cases, the CM is a passive response, and in the absence of outer hair cell (OHC) damage, mice lacking amplification are expected to generate WT levels of CM for inputs less than approximately 30 kHz. Hence, this cochlear potential is not a useful metric to estimate changes in amplifier gain. This modeling analysis may explain much of the paradoxical data in the literature. For example, various manipulations, including the application of salicylate and activation of the crossed olivocochlear bundle, reduce the compound action potential but increase or do not change the CM. Based on this current evaluation, CM measurements are consistent with early descriptions where this AC cochlear potential is dominated by basal OHCs, when recorded at the round window.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20957507      PMCID: PMC3015034          DOI: 10.1007/s10162-010-0240-5

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Assoc Res Otolaryngol        ISSN: 1438-7573


  61 in total

1.  Augmentation of cochlear microphonic by stimulation of efferent fibres to the cochlea; preliminary report.

Authors:  J FEX
Journal:  Acta Otolaryngol       Date:  1959 Nov-Dec       Impact factor: 1.494

2.  Frequency tuning of basilar membrane and auditory nerve fibers in the same cochleae.

Authors:  S S Narayan; A N Temchin; A Recio; M A Ruggero
Journal:  Science       Date:  1998-12-04       Impact factor: 47.728

3.  Automatic monitoring of mechano-electrical transduction in the guinea pig cochlea.

Authors:  R Patuzzi; A Moleirinho
Journal:  Hear Res       Date:  1998-11       Impact factor: 3.208

4.  Medial efferent inhibition suppresses basilar membrane responses to near characteristic frequency tones of moderate to high intensities.

Authors:  I J Russell; E Murugasu
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  1997-09       Impact factor: 1.840

5.  Single-neuron labeling and chronic cochlear pathology. III. Stereocilia damage and alterations of threshold tuning curves.

Authors:  M C Liberman; L W Dodds
Journal:  Hear Res       Date:  1984-10       Impact factor: 3.208

6.  Synaptic hyperpolarization and inhibition of turtle cochlear hair cells.

Authors:  J J Art; R Fettiplace; P A Fuchs
Journal:  J Physiol       Date:  1984-11       Impact factor: 5.182

7.  Two-tone interactions in the cochlear microphonic.

Authors:  M A Cheatham; P Dallos
Journal:  Hear Res       Date:  1982-09       Impact factor: 3.208

8.  Membrane resistance in endolymphatic walls of the first turn of the guinea-pig cochlea.

Authors:  B M Johnstone; J R Johnstone; I D Pugsley
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  1966-12       Impact factor: 1.840

9.  Cochlear function in Prestin knockout mice.

Authors:  M A Cheatham; K H Huynh; J Gao; J Zuo; P Dallos
Journal:  J Physiol       Date:  2004-08-19       Impact factor: 5.182

10.  Evaluation of an independent prestin mouse model derived from the 129S1 strain.

Authors:  M A Cheatham; J Zheng; K H Huynh; G G Du; R M Edge; C T Anderson; J Zuo; A F Ryan; P Dallos
Journal:  Audiol Neurootol       Date:  2007-07-27       Impact factor: 1.854

View more
  32 in total

1.  Effects of low-frequency biasing on otoacoustic and neural measures suggest that stimulus-frequency otoacoustic emissions originate near the peak region of the traveling wave.

Authors:  Jeffery T Lichtenhan
Journal:  J Assoc Res Otolaryngol       Date:  2011-10-15

2.  An analytic approach to identifying the sources of the low-frequency round window cochlear response.

Authors:  Aryn M Kamerer; Mark E Chertoff
Journal:  Hear Res       Date:  2019-02-15       Impact factor: 3.208

3.  Detection of cochlear amplification and its activation.

Authors:  Wei Dong; Elizabeth S Olson
Journal:  Biophys J       Date:  2013-08-20       Impact factor: 4.033

4.  Spectral Ripples in Round-Window Cochlear Microphonics: Evidence for Multiple Generation Mechanisms.

Authors:  Karolina K Charaziak; Jonathan H Siegel; Christopher A Shera
Journal:  J Assoc Res Otolaryngol       Date:  2018-07-16

5.  Tuning of SFOAEs Evoked by Low-Frequency Tones Is Not Compatible with Localized Emission Generation.

Authors:  Karolina K Charaziak; Jonathan H Siegel
Journal:  J Assoc Res Otolaryngol       Date:  2015-03-27

6.  Predicting the location of missing outer hair cells using the electrical signal recorded at the round window.

Authors:  Mark E Chertoff; Brian R Earl; Francisco J Diaz; Janna L Sorensen; Megan L A Thomas; Aryn M Kamerer; Marcello Peppi
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2014-09       Impact factor: 1.840

7.  Estimating cochlear frequency selectivity with stimulus-frequency otoacoustic emissions in chinchillas.

Authors:  Karolina K Charaziak; Jonathan H Siegel
Journal:  J Assoc Res Otolaryngol       Date:  2014-09-18

8.  Neuroplastin Isoform Np55 Is Expressed in the Stereocilia of Outer Hair Cells and Required for Normal Outer Hair Cell Function.

Authors:  Wei-Zheng Zeng; Nicolas Grillet; James B Dewey; Alix Trouillet; Jocelyn F Krey; Peter G Barr-Gillespie; John S Oghalai; Ulrich Müller
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2016-08-31       Impact factor: 6.167

9.  Electrophysiological properties of cochlear implantation in the gerbil using a flexible array.

Authors:  Christine DeMason; Baishakhi Choudhury; Faisal Ahmad; Douglas C Fitzpatrick; Jacob Wang; Craig A Buchman; Oliver F Adunka
Journal:  Ear Hear       Date:  2012 Jul-Aug       Impact factor: 3.570

10.  The potential use of low-frequency tones to locate regions of outer hair cell loss.

Authors:  Aryn M Kamerer; Francisco J Diaz; Marcello Peppi; Mark E Chertoff
Journal:  Hear Res       Date:  2016-09-24       Impact factor: 3.208

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.