| Literature DB >> 21980351 |
Kathrin Langen1, Julia Schwarzer, Harald Kullmann, Theo C M Bakker, Timo Thünken.
Abstract
In wild animal populations, the degree of inbreeding differs between species and within species between populations. Because mating with kin often results in inbreeding depression, observed inbreeding is usually regarded to be caused by limited outbreeding opportunities due to demographic factors like small population size or population substructuring. However, theory predicts inclusive benefits from mating with kin, and thus part of the observed variation in inbreeding might be due to active inbreeding preferences. Although some recent studies indeed report kin mating preferences, the evidence is still highly ambiguous. Here, we investigate inbreeding in a natural population of the West African cichlid fish Pelvicachromis taeniatus which showed clear kin mating preferences in standardized laboratory experiments but no inbreeding depression. The presented microsatellite analysis reveals that the natural population has, in comparison to two reference populations, a reduced allelic diversity (A = 3) resulting in a low heterozygosity (H(o) = 0.167) pointing to a highly inbred population. Furthermore, we found a significant heterozygote deficit not only at population (F(is) = 0.116) but also at subpopulation level (F(is) = 0.081) suggesting that inbreeding is not only a by-product of population substructuring but possibly a consequence of behavioral kin preferences.Entities:
Mesh:
Year: 2011 PMID: 21980351 PMCID: PMC3184091 DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0024689
Source DB: PubMed Journal: PLoS One ISSN: 1932-6203 Impact factor: 3.240
Figure 1Map of the Moliwe river system.
The six sampling sites are marked A–F. The Moliwe river system consists of the Moliwe river and the smaller Mile 4 stream. Double bars indicate physical barriers like waterfalls and rapids (the thickness of the symbol corresponds to the extent of the migration barrier). The arrow indicates the direction of the water flow. The map is based on GPS data (recorded with Magellan explorist 100 GPS Receiver).
Figure 2Comparisons of the three Pelvicachromis populations.
Median (± quartiles and ranges) of (a) number of alleles per locus, (b) inbreeding coefficient Fis and (c) observed heterozygosity. In the analyses only loci were included that were polymorphic in all populations (N = 7). * indicates p<0.05, ** p<0.01, *** p<0.001, n.s. = not significant, p>0.05.
Microsatellite diversity indices in the three studied Pelvicachromis populations.
| Population | N | Loci | A | Amedian | He | Ho | PHWE | Fis |
|
| 200 | 17 | 3.00 | 1.5 | 0.1893 | 0.1673 | <0.001 | 0.116 |
|
| 9 | 16 | 5.63 | 2.5 | 0.607 | 0.5486 | 0.3513 | 0.096 |
|
| 31 | 17 | 8.88 | 3.0 | 0.5736 | 0.4573 | <0.001 | 0.203 |
Sample size (N), number of loci typed in the sample (Loci), mean number of alleles per locus (A), median of number of alleles per locus (Amedian), mean expected (He) and observed heterozygosity (Ho), results of probability test for deviation from expected Hardy-Weinberg proportions (PHWE), mean inbreeding coefficient (Fis).
FST values, Dest values and distances between the five sampling sites of the Moliwe population.
| Sampling site | A | B | C | D | F |
| A | - | 2.201 | 1.797 | 0.367 | 1.240 |
| B |
| - | 0.405 | 1.834 | 0.961 |
| C |
| 0.015 | - | 1.430 | 0.557 |
| D |
| 0.008/0.0004 | 0.014 | - | 0.873 |
| F |
| -0.002/0 | 0.012 | 0.010/0.0001 | - |
The upper matrix gives the distances between sampling points in kilometers. The lower matrix shows the estimated pairwise FST values (left) and Dest values (right) between the five sampling sites of the Moliwe population.
***indicates p≤0.001, and.
*p<0.05.
Results that remain statistically significant after Bonferroni correction are marked in bold.
Figure 3Population structure.
Structure bar plot of the estimated membership coefficients Q for each individual in each cluster. Two subpopulations (K = 2) were estimated in the Moliwe population: Mile 4 stream (A) and Moliwe River (B, C, D, F). Each bar represents one individual (x-axis) of the Moliwe population and is broken in K colored segments, with the length proportional to each of the K inferred clusters (y-axis).
Microsatellite diversity indices at the Mile 4 (sampling site A) and the Moliwe (sampling sites B, C, D and F) subpopulation.
| Subpopulation | N | Loci | A | Amedian | He | Ho | PHWE | Fis |
| Mile 4 river | 40 | 17 | 1.47 | 1 | 0.0785 | 0.0809 | 0.3429 | −0.031 |
| Moliwe river | 154 | 17 | 2.94 | 1.5 | 0.2120 | 0.1948 | <0.001 | 0.081 |
Sample size (N), number of loci typed in the sample (Loci), mean number of alleles per locus (A), median of number of alleles per locus (Amedian), mean expected (He) and observed heterozygosity (Ho), results of Hardy-Weinberg probability test for deviation from expected Hardy-Weinberg proportions (PHWE), inbreeding coefficient Fis.