Literature DB >> 18564378

Experimental evolution of the genetic load and its implications for the genetic basis of inbreeding depression.

Charles W Fox1, Kristy L Scheibly, David H Reed.   

Abstract

The degree to which, and rapidity with which, inbreeding depression can be purged from a population has important implications for conservation biology, captive breeding practices, and invasive species biology. The degree and rate of purging also informs us regarding the genetic mechanisms underlying inbreeding depression. We examine the evolution of mean survival and inbreeding depression in survival following serial inbreeding in a seed-feeding beetle, Stator limbatus, which shows substantial inbreeding depression at all stages of development. We created two replicate serially inbred populations perpetuated by full-sib matings and paired with outbred controls. The genetic load for the probability that an egg produces an adult was purged at approximately 0.45-0.50 lethal equivalents/generation, a reduction of more than half after only three generations of sib-mating. After serial inbreeding we outcrossed all beetles then measured (1) larval survival of outcrossed beetles and (2) inbreeding depression. Survival of outcrossed beetles evolved to be higher in the serially inbred populations for all periods of development. Inbreeding depression and the genetic load were significantly lower in the serially inbred than control populations. Inbreeding depression affecting larval survival of S. limbatus is largely due to recessive deleterious alleles of large effect that can be rapidly purged from a population by serial sib-mating. However, the effectiveness of purging varied among the periods of egg/larval survival and likely varies among other unstudied fitness components. This study presents novel results showing rapid and extensive purging of the genetic load, specifically a reduction of as much as 72% in only three generations of sib-mating. However, the high rate of extinction of inbred lines, despite the lines being reared in a benign laboratory environment, indicates that intentional purging of the genetic load of captive endangered species will not be practical due to high rates of subpopulation extinction.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18564378     DOI: 10.1111/j.1558-5646.2008.00441.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Evolution        ISSN: 0014-3820            Impact factor:   3.694


  14 in total

1.  Among-individual variation in pollen limitation and inbreeding depression in a mixed-mating shrub.

Authors:  Juan P González-Varo; Anna Traveset
Journal:  Ann Bot       Date:  2010-10-05       Impact factor: 4.357

Review 2.  The genetics of inbreeding depression.

Authors:  Deborah Charlesworth; John H Willis
Journal:  Nat Rev Genet       Date:  2009-11       Impact factor: 53.242

3.  Slow inbred lines of Drosophila melanogaster express as much inbreeding depression as fast inbred lines under semi-natural conditions.

Authors:  Torsten Nygaard Kristensen; Morten Ravn Knudsen; Volker Loeschcke
Journal:  Genetica       Date:  2011-03-18       Impact factor: 1.082

4.  Inbreeding depression and purging in a haplodiploid: gender-related effects.

Authors:  N S H Tien; M W Sabelis; M Egas
Journal:  Heredity (Edinb)       Date:  2014-11-19       Impact factor: 3.821

5.  Inbreeding load and purging: implications for the short-term survival and the conservation management of small populations.

Authors:  A Caballero; I Bravo; J Wang
Journal:  Heredity (Edinb)       Date:  2016-09-14       Impact factor: 3.821

6.  Patterns of Genetic Coding Variation in a Native American Population before and after European Contact.

Authors:  John Lindo; Mary Rogers; Elizabeth K Mallott; Barbara Petzelt; Joycelynn Mitchell; David Archer; Jerome S Cybulski; Ripan S Malhi; Michael DeGiorgio
Journal:  Am J Hum Genet       Date:  2018-04-26       Impact factor: 11.025

7.  Microsatellite support for active inbreeding in a cichlid fish.

Authors:  Kathrin Langen; Julia Schwarzer; Harald Kullmann; Theo C M Bakker; Timo Thünken
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2011-09-30       Impact factor: 3.240

8.  Inbreeding alters intersexual fitness correlations in Drosophila simulans.

Authors:  Eoin Duffy; Richa Joag; Jacek Radwan; Nina Wedell; David J Hosken
Journal:  Ecol Evol       Date:  2014-08-05       Impact factor: 2.912

9.  Outbreeding effects in an inbreeding insect, Cimex lectularius.

Authors:  Toby Fountain; Roger K Butlin; Klaus Reinhardt; Oliver Otti
Journal:  Ecol Evol       Date:  2014-12-28       Impact factor: 2.912

10.  Generation-based life table analysis reveals manifold effects of inbreeding on the population fitness in Plutella xylostella.

Authors:  Lu Peng; Mingmin Zou; Nana Ren; Miao Xie; Liette Vasseur; Yifan Yang; Weiyi He; Guang Yang; Geoff M Gurr; Youming Hou; Shijun You; Minsheng You
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2015-07-31       Impact factor: 4.379

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.