Literature DB >> 18173505

Role of inbreeding depression and purging in captive breeding and restoration programmes.

Paul L Leberg1, Brigette D Firmin.   

Abstract

Inbreeding depression is a major force affecting the evolution and viability of small populations in captive breeding and restoration programmes. Populations that experience small sizes may be less susceptible to future inbreeding depression because they have been purged of deleterious recessive alleles. We review issues related to purging, as they apply to the management of small populations, and discuss an experiment we conducted examining purging in populations of mosquitofish (Gambusia affinis). Purging is an important process in many small populations, but the literature contains a diversity of responses to purging both within and among studies. With the exception that slow inbreeding results in more purging and less threat to population viability, there seem to be few consistent trends that aid in prediction of how a purging event will affect a population. In our examination of purging on population viability in mosquitofish, single or multiple bottlenecks do not appear to have resulted in any purging of the influence of genetic load on population growth. Rather, serial bottlenecks resulted in a marked decline in population growth and an increase in extinction. Our results, taken together with those of reviewed studies, suggest that in small populations there is great uncertainty regarding the success of any single purging event in eliminating inbreeding depression, together with the high likelihood that purging will depress population viability through the fixation of deleterious alleles. In management of captive breeding and restoration programmes, the common practice of avoiding inbreeding and small population sizes should be followed whenever possible.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18173505     DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-294X.2007.03433.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Mol Ecol        ISSN: 0962-1083            Impact factor:   6.185


  30 in total

1.  Understanding and predicting the fitness decline of shrunk populations: inbreeding, purging, mutation, and standard selection.

Authors:  Aurora García-Dorado
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2012-01-31       Impact factor: 4.562

2.  Reduction in the cumulative effect of stress-induced inbreeding depression due to intragenerational purging in Drosophila melanogaster.

Authors:  L S Enders; L Nunney
Journal:  Heredity (Edinb)       Date:  2015-11-25       Impact factor: 3.821

3.  On the consequences of ignoring purging on genetic recommendations for minimum viable population rules.

Authors:  A García-Dorado
Journal:  Heredity (Edinb)       Date:  2015-04-15       Impact factor: 3.821

4.  How well can captive breeding programs conserve biodiversity? A review of salmonids.

Authors:  Dylan J Fraser
Journal:  Evol Appl       Date:  2008-06-02       Impact factor: 5.183

5.  Drift load in populations of small size and low density.

Authors:  Y Willi; P Griffin; J Van Buskirk
Journal:  Heredity (Edinb)       Date:  2012-12-05       Impact factor: 3.821

6.  Purging deleterious mutations in conservation programmes: combining optimal contributions with inbred matings.

Authors:  M Á R de Cara; B Villanueva; M Á Toro; J Fernández
Journal:  Heredity (Edinb)       Date:  2013-01-16       Impact factor: 3.821

7.  Inbreeding load and purging: implications for the short-term survival and the conservation management of small populations.

Authors:  A Caballero; I Bravo; J Wang
Journal:  Heredity (Edinb)       Date:  2016-09-14       Impact factor: 3.821

8.  Demographic costs of inbreeding revealed by sex-specific genetic rescue effects.

Authors:  Susanne R K Zajitschek; Felix Zajitschek; Robert C Brooks
Journal:  BMC Evol Biol       Date:  2009-12-10       Impact factor: 3.260

9.  High genetic load in an old isolated butterfly population.

Authors:  Anniina L K Mattila; Anne Duplouy; Malla Kirjokangas; Rainer Lehtonen; Pasi Rastas; Ilkka Hanski
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2012-08-20       Impact factor: 11.205

10.  Genetic diversity and conservation status of managed vicuña (Vicugna vicugna) populations in Argentina.

Authors:  M Anello; M S Daverio; S R Romero; F Rigalt; M B Silbestro; L Vidal-Rioja; F Di Rocco
Journal:  Genetica       Date:  2016-02-03       Impact factor: 1.082

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.