Literature DB >> 9533122

Factors affecting levels of genetic diversity in natural populations.

W Amos1, J Harwood.   

Abstract

Genetic variability is the clay of evolution, providing the base material on which adaptation and speciation depend. It is often assumed that most interspecific differences in variability are due primarily to population size effects, with bottlenecked populations carrying less variability than those of stable size. However, we show that population bottlenecks are unlikely to be the only factor, even in classic case studies such as the northern elephant seal and the cheetah, where genetic polymorphism is virtually absent. Instead, we suggest that the low levels of variability observed in endangered populations are more likely to result from a combination of publication biases, which tend to inflate the level of variability which is considered 'normal', and inbreeding effects, which may hasten loss of variability due to drift. To account for species with large population sizes but low variability we advance three hypotheses. First, it is known that certain metapopulation structures can result in effective population sizes far below the census size. Second, there is increasing evidence that heterozygous sites mutate more frequently than equivalent homozygous sites, plausibly because mismatch repair between homologous chromosomes during meiosis provides extra opportunities to mutate. Such a mechanism would undermine the simple relationship between heterozygosity and effective population size. Third, the fact that related species that differ greatly in variability implies that large amounts of variability can be gained or lost rapidly. We argue that such cases are best explained by rapid loss through a genome-wide selective sweep, and suggest a mechanism by which this could come about, based on forced changes to a control gene inducing coevolution in the genes it controls. Our model, based on meiotic drive in mammals, but easily extended to other systems, would tend to facilitate population isolation by generating molecular incompatabilities. Circumstances can even be envisioned in which the process could provide intrinsic impetus to speciation.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1998        PMID: 9533122      PMCID: PMC1692205          DOI: 10.1098/rstb.1998.0200

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci        ISSN: 0962-8436            Impact factor:   6.237


  66 in total

1.  Genes that violate Mendel's rules.

Authors:  J F Crow
Journal:  Sci Am       Date:  1979-02       Impact factor: 2.142

2.  Microsatellite evolution--a reciprocal study of repeat lengths at homologous loci in cattle and sheep.

Authors:  H Ellegren; S Moore; N Robinson; K Byrne; W Ward; B C Sheldon
Journal:  Mol Biol Evol       Date:  1997-08       Impact factor: 16.240

3.  Mismatch repair-induced meiotic recombination requires the pms1 gene product.

Authors:  R H Borts; W Y Leung; W Kramer; B Kramer; M Williamson; S Fogel; J E Haber
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  1990-03       Impact factor: 4.562

4.  Repeat expansion--all in a flap?

Authors:  D A Gordenin; T A Kunkel; M A Resnick
Journal:  Nat Genet       Date:  1997-06       Impact factor: 38.330

5.  DNA fingerprints from hypervariable mitochondrial genotypes.

Authors:  J C Avise; B W Bowen; T Lamb
Journal:  Mol Biol Evol       Date:  1989-05       Impact factor: 16.240

6.  A generalized approach for estimating effective population size from temporal changes in allele frequency.

Authors:  R S Waples
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  1989-02       Impact factor: 4.562

7.  Evolution of high mutation rates in experimental populations of E. coli.

Authors:  P D Sniegowski; P J Gerrish; R E Lenski
Journal:  Nature       Date:  1997-06-12       Impact factor: 49.962

8.  Comparative nuclear and mitochondrial genome diversity in humans and chimpanzees.

Authors:  C A Wise; M Sraml; D C Rubinsztein; S Easteal
Journal:  Mol Biol Evol       Date:  1997-07       Impact factor: 16.240

Review 9.  The double-strand-break repair model for recombination.

Authors:  J W Szostak; T L Orr-Weaver; R J Rothstein; F W Stahl
Journal:  Cell       Date:  1983-05       Impact factor: 41.582

10.  Length and distribution of meiotic gene conversion tracts and crossovers in Saccharomyces cerevisiae.

Authors:  R H Borts; J E Haber
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  1989-09       Impact factor: 4.562

View more
  63 in total

Review 1.  Microsatellite and trinucleotide-repeat evolution: evidence for mutational bias and different rates of evolution in different lineages.

Authors:  D C Rubinsztein; B Amos; G Cooper
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  1999-06-29       Impact factor: 6.237

2.  Genetic bottlenecks reduce population variation in an experimental RNA virus population.

Authors:  Hongye Li; Marilyn J Roossinck
Journal:  J Virol       Date:  2004-10       Impact factor: 5.103

3.  Does population size affect genetic diversity? A test with sympatric lizard species.

Authors:  M T J Hague; E J Routman
Journal:  Heredity (Edinb)       Date:  2015-08-26       Impact factor: 3.821

4.  High levels of sequence polymorphism and linkage disequilibrium at the telomere of 12q: implications for telomere biology and human evolution.

Authors:  D M Baird; J Coleman; Z H Rosser; N J Royle
Journal:  Am J Hum Genet       Date:  2000-01       Impact factor: 11.025

5.  Microsatellite length differences between humans and chimpanzees at autosomal Loci are not found at equivalent haploid Y chromosomal Loci.

Authors:  Manfred Kayser; Edward J Vowles; Dennis Kappei; William Amos
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2006-06-18       Impact factor: 4.562

6.  Ancient DNA reveals Holocene loss of genetic diversity in a South American rodent.

Authors:  Yvonne L Chan; Eileen A Lacey; Oliver P Pearson; Elizabeth A Hadly
Journal:  Biol Lett       Date:  2005-12-22       Impact factor: 3.703

7.  How does resource supply affect evolutionary diversification?

Authors:  Alex R Hall; Nick Colegrave
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2007-01-07       Impact factor: 5.349

8.  Surviving with low genetic diversity: the case of albatrosses.

Authors:  Emmanuel Milot; Henri Weimerskirch; Pierre Duchesne; Louis Bernatchez
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2007-03-22       Impact factor: 5.349

9.  Evidence of rapid change in genetic structure and diversity during range expansion in a recovering large terrestrial carnivore.

Authors:  Snorre B Hagen; Alexander Kopatz; Jouni Aspi; Ilpo Kojola; Hans Geir Eiken
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2015-05-22       Impact factor: 5.349

Review 10.  Extreme events as shaping physiology, ecology, and evolution of plants: toward a unified definition and evaluation of their consequences.

Authors:  Vincent P Gutschick; Hormoz BassiriRad
Journal:  New Phytol       Date:  2003-10       Impact factor: 10.151

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.