Literature DB >> 17148214

Extrapair mating between relatives in the barn swallow: a role for kin selection?

Oddmund Kleven1, Frode Jacobsen, Raleigh J Robertson, Jan T Lifjeld.   

Abstract

Why do females of many species mate with more than one male? One of the main hypotheses suggests that female promiscuity is an insurance mechanism against the potential detrimental effects of inbreeding. Accordingly, females should preferably mate with less related males in multiple or extrapair mating. Here we analyse paternity, relatedness among mating partners, and relatedness between parents and offspring, in the socially monogamous North American barn swallow (Hirundo rustica erythrogaster). In contrast to the inbreeding avoidance hypothesis, we found that extrapair mating partners were more related than expected by random choice, and tended to be more related than social partners. Furthermore, extrapair mating resulted in genetic parents being more related to their extrapair young than to their withinpair young. We propose a new hypothesis for extrapair mating based on kin selection theory as a possible explanation to these findings.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2005        PMID: 17148214      PMCID: PMC1626374          DOI: 10.1098/rsbl.2005.0376

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Biol Lett        ISSN: 1744-9561            Impact factor:   3.703


  11 in total

Review 1.  Why do females mate multiply? A review of the genetic benefits.

Authors:  M D Jennions; M Petrie
Journal:  Biol Rev Camb Philos Soc       Date:  2000-02

Review 2.  Genetic compatibility, mate choice and patterns of parentage: invited review.

Authors:  T Tregenza; N Wedell
Journal:  Mol Ecol       Date:  2000-08       Impact factor: 6.185

3.  Genetic similarity between mates and extra-pair parentage in three species of shorebirds.

Authors:  Donald Blomqvist; Malte Andersson; Clemens Küpper; Innes C Cuthill; János Kis; Richard B Lanctot; Brett K Sandercock; Tamás Székely; Johan Wallander; Bart Kempenaers
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2002-10-10       Impact factor: 49.962

4.  Inbreeding avoidance through kin recognition: choosy females boost male dispersal.

Authors:  Laurent Lehmann; Nicolas Perrin
Journal:  Am Nat       Date:  2003-11-06       Impact factor: 3.926

5.  Measuring inbreeding depression in the wild: the old ways are the best.

Authors:  Josephine Pemberton
Journal:  Trends Ecol Evol       Date:  2004-12       Impact factor: 17.712

6.  A DNA test to sex most birds.

Authors:  R Griffiths; M C Double; K Orr; R J Dawson
Journal:  Mol Ecol       Date:  1998-08       Impact factor: 6.185

7.  Extra-pair paternity in birds: explaining variation between species and populations.

Authors:  M Petrie; B Kempenaers
Journal:  Trends Ecol Evol       Date:  1998-02-01       Impact factor: 17.712

8.  The genetical evolution of social behaviour. I.

Authors:  W D Hamilton
Journal:  J Theor Biol       Date:  1964-07       Impact factor: 2.691

9.  Do sibling tits (Parus major, P. caeruleus) disperse over similar distances and in similar directions?

Authors:  E Matthysen; T Van de Casteele; F Adriaensen
Journal:  Oecologia       Date:  2004-12-01       Impact factor: 3.225

10.  Females increase offspring heterozygosity and fitness through extra-pair matings.

Authors:  Katharina Foerster; Kaspar Delhey; Arild Johnsen; Jan T Lifjeld; Bart Kempenaers
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2003-10-16       Impact factor: 49.962

View more
  18 in total

Review 1.  Female choice for genetic complementarity in birds: a review.

Authors:  Herman L Mays; Tomas Albrecht; Mark Liu; Geoffrey E Hill
Journal:  Genetica       Date:  2007-11-02       Impact factor: 1.082

2.  Female extrapair mate choice in a cooperative breeder: trading sex for help and increasing offspring heterozygosity.

Authors:  Dustin R Rubenstein
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2007-08-07       Impact factor: 5.349

3.  Cryptic female preference for genetically unrelated males is mediated by ovarian fluid in the guppy.

Authors:  Clelia Gasparini; Andrea Pilastro
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2011-01-12       Impact factor: 5.349

4.  Why inclusive fitness can make it adaptive to produce less fit extra-pair offspring.

Authors:  Jussi Lehtonen; Hanna Kokko
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2015-02-22       Impact factor: 5.349

5.  Age before beauty? Relationships between fertilization success and age-dependent ornaments in barn swallows.

Authors:  Jan T Lifjeld; Oddmund Kleven; Frode Jacobsen; Kevin J McGraw; Rebecca J Safran; Raleigh J Robertson
Journal:  Behav Ecol Sociobiol       Date:  2011-03-22       Impact factor: 2.980

6.  Microsatellite support for active inbreeding in a cichlid fish.

Authors:  Kathrin Langen; Julia Schwarzer; Harald Kullmann; Theo C M Bakker; Timo Thünken
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2011-09-30       Impact factor: 3.240

7.  What happens after inbreeding avoidance? Inbreeding by rejected relatives and the inclusive fitness benefit of inbreeding avoidance.

Authors:  A Bradley Duthie; Jane M Reid
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2015-04-24       Impact factor: 3.240

8.  Genetic and potential non-genetic benefits increase offspring fitness of polyandrous females in non-resource based mating system.

Authors:  Jukka Kekäläinen; Geir Rudolfsen; Matti Janhunen; Lars Figenschou; Nina Peuhkuri; Niina Tamper; Raine Kortet
Journal:  BMC Evol Biol       Date:  2010-01-22       Impact factor: 3.260

9.  Re-mating across years and intralineage polygyny are associated with greater than expected levels of inbreeding in wild red deer.

Authors:  K V Stopher; D H Nussey; T H Clutton-Brock; F Guinness; A Morris; J M Pemberton
Journal:  J Evol Biol       Date:  2012-10-05       Impact factor: 2.411

10.  Microsatellite evolution: Mutations, sequence variation, and homoplasy in the hypervariable avian microsatellite locus HrU10.

Authors:  Jarl A Anmarkrud; Oddmund Kleven; Lutz Bachmann; Jan T Lifjeld
Journal:  BMC Evol Biol       Date:  2008-05-09       Impact factor: 3.260

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.