Literature DB >> 20685700

Population admixture, biological invasions and the balance between local adaptation and inbreeding depression.

Koen J F Verhoeven1, Mirka Macel, Lorne M Wolfe, Arjen Biere.   

Abstract

When previously isolated populations meet and mix, the resulting admixed population can benefit from several genetic advantages, including increased genetic variation, the creation of novel genotypes and the masking of deleterious mutations. These admixture benefits are thought to play an important role in biological invasions. In contrast, populations in their native range often remain differentiated and frequently suffer from inbreeding depression owing to isolation. While the advantages of admixture are evident for introduced populations that experienced recent bottlenecks or that face novel selection pressures, it is less obvious why native range populations do not similarly benefit from admixture. Here we argue that a temporary loss of local adaptation in recent invaders fundamentally alters the fitness consequences of admixture. In native populations, selection against dilution of the locally adapted gene pool inhibits unconstrained admixture and reinforces population isolation, with some level of inbreeding depression as an expected consequence. We show that admixture is selected against despite significant inbreeding depression because the benefits of local adaptation are greater than the cost of inbreeding. In contrast, introduced populations that have not yet established a pattern of local adaptation can freely reap the benefits of admixture. There can be strong selection for admixture because it instantly lifts the inbreeding depression that had built up in isolated parental populations. Recent work in Silene suggests that reduced inbreeding depression associated with post-introduction admixture may contribute to enhanced fitness of invasive populations. We hypothesize that in locally adapted populations, the benefits of local adaptation are balanced against an inbreeding cost that could develop in part owing to the isolating effect of local adaptation itself. The inbreeding cost can be revealed in admixing populations during recent invasions.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20685700      PMCID: PMC2992731          DOI: 10.1098/rspb.2010.1272

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Proc Biol Sci        ISSN: 0962-8452            Impact factor:   5.349


  24 in total

1.  Hybridization as a stimulus for the evolution of invasiveness in plants?

Authors:  N C Ellstrand; K A Schierenbeck
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2000-06-20       Impact factor: 11.205

Review 2.  Perspective: Reproductive isolation caused by natural selection against immigrants from divergent habitats.

Authors:  Patrik Nosil; Timothy H Vines; Daniel J Funk
Journal:  Evolution       Date:  2005-04       Impact factor: 3.694

3.  Heterosis, the catapult effect and establishment success of a colonizing bird.

Authors:  John M Drake
Journal:  Biol Lett       Date:  2006-06-22       Impact factor: 3.703

4.  Increased plant size in exotic populations: a common-garden test with 14 invasive species.

Authors:  Dana M Blumenthal; Ruth A Hufbauer
Journal:  Ecology       Date:  2007-11       Impact factor: 5.499

5.  Heterogeneous genomic differentiation between walking-stick ecotypes: "isolation by adaptation" and multiple roles for divergent selection.

Authors:  Patrik Nosil; Scott P Egan; Daniel J Funk
Journal:  Evolution       Date:  2007-11-12       Impact factor: 3.694

6.  Increased genetic variation and evolutionary potential drive the success of an invasive grass.

Authors:  Sébastien Lavergne; Jane Molofsky
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2007-02-28       Impact factor: 11.205

7.  Adaptation and colonization history affect the evolution of clines in two introduced species.

Authors:  Stephen R Keller; Dexter R Sowell; Maurine Neiman; Lorne M Wolfe; Douglas R Taylor
Journal:  New Phytol       Date:  2009-06-15       Impact factor: 10.151

Review 8.  The genetics of inbreeding depression.

Authors:  Deborah Charlesworth; John H Willis
Journal:  Nat Rev Genet       Date:  2009-11       Impact factor: 53.242

9.  Molecular and quantitative genetic differentiation in European populations of Silene latifolia (Caryophyllaceae).

Authors:  Céline Jolivet; Giorgina Bernasconi
Journal:  Ann Bot       Date:  2007-06-12       Impact factor: 4.357

10.  The genetic basis of adaptive population differentiation: a quantitative trait locus analysis of fitness traits in two wild barley populations from contrasting habitats.

Authors:  Koen J F Verhoeven; Tytti K Vanhala; Arjen Biere; Eviatar Nevo; Jos M M van Damme
Journal:  Evolution       Date:  2004-02       Impact factor: 3.694

View more
  64 in total

1.  Variation in founder groups promotes establishment success in the wild.

Authors:  Anders Forsman; Lena Wennersten; Magnus Karlsson; Sofia Caesar
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2012-03-28       Impact factor: 5.349

2.  Association of population mixing and acute lymphocytic leukemia in children and young adults.

Authors:  Joseph Lubega; M David Hallman; Philip J Lupo; Yunxin Fu; Leif Peterson; Michael E Scheurer
Journal:  Cancer Epidemiol       Date:  2020-04-28       Impact factor: 2.984

Review 3.  Effects of genotypic and phenotypic variation on establishment are important for conservation, invasion, and infection biology.

Authors:  Anders Forsman
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2013-12-23       Impact factor: 11.205

4.  Dispersal and selection mediate hybridization between a native and invasive species.

Authors:  Ryan P Kovach; Clint C Muhlfeld; Matthew C Boyer; Winsor H Lowe; Fred W Allendorf; Gordon Luikart
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2015-01-22       Impact factor: 5.349

Review 5.  Population-level genetic variation and climate change in a biodiversity hotspot.

Authors:  Kristina A Schierenbeck
Journal:  Ann Bot       Date:  2017-01-09       Impact factor: 4.357

Review 6.  Invasions and extinctions through the looking glass of evolutionary ecology.

Authors:  Robert I Colautti; Jake M Alexander; Katrina M Dlugosch; Stephen R Keller; Sonia E Sultan
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  2017-01-19       Impact factor: 6.237

7.  Natural selection and outbreeding depression suggest adaptive differentiation in the invasive range of a clonal plant.

Authors:  Pauline O Pantoja; C E Timothy Paine; Mario Vallejo-Marín
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2018-07-11       Impact factor: 5.349

8.  Reticulate evolution is favored in influenza niche switching.

Authors:  Eric J Ma; Nichola J Hill; Justin Zabilansky; Kyle Yuan; Jonathan A Runstadler
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2016-04-25       Impact factor: 11.205

9.  Extensive genetic diversity and substructuring among zebrafish strains revealed through copy number variant analysis.

Authors:  Kim H Brown; Kimberly P Dobrinski; Arthur S Lee; Omer Gokcumen; Ryan E Mills; Xinghua Shi; Wilson W S Chong; Jin Yun Helen Chen; Paulo Yoo; Sthuthi David; Samuel M Peterson; Towfique Raj; Kwong Wai Choy; Barbara E Stranger; Robin E Williamson; Leonard I Zon; Jennifer L Freeman; Charles Lee
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2011-12-27       Impact factor: 11.205

10.  Potential limits to the benefits of admixture during biological invasion.

Authors:  Brittany S Barker; Janelle E Cocio; Samantha R Anderson; Joseph E Braasch; Feng A Cang; Heather D Gillette; Katrina M Dlugosch
Journal:  Mol Ecol       Date:  2018-12-21       Impact factor: 6.185

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.