Literature DB >> 1865906

Effects of a change in the level of inbreeding on the genetic load.

S C Barrett1, D Charlesworth.   

Abstract

"The effects of inbreeding may not be as noticeable in the first generation as the invigoration immediately apparent after crossing". This statement, published in 1919, has received little attention, and has apparently never been tested empirically, although the reduction of the genetic load of populations by inbreeding is well known in theoretical terms. Because inbreeding increases homozygosity, and hence the effectiveness of selection against recessive or partially recessive detrimental alleles, changes in levels of inbreeding can lead to a reduction in the frequencies of such mutant alleles. This results in equilibration at higher population mean fitness and is referred to as 'purging' populations of their genetic load. Severe inbreeding can also reduce genetic load due to overdominant alleles, provided selection coefficients are not symmetrical at all loci, because alleles giving lower fitness will be reduced in frequency at equilibrium. With either fitness model, however, reduction in genetic load takes time, and the initial effect of an increase in inbreeding is reduced fitness due to homozygosity. There are few data relating to the extent to which fitness is reduced during inbreeding in a set of lines and to how long the reduction lasts before increasing again to the initial level, or higher. Inbreeding experiments involving sib mating in mice and Drosophila subobscura, and successive bottlenecks in house flies have yielded some evidence consistent with the purging hypothesis. Here, we report results of an experiment demonstrating a prolonged time-course of recovery of mean fitness under self-fertilization of a naturally outcrossing plant, and also compare our results with expectations derived by computer calculations. Our results show that the genetic load present in an outcrossing population can be explained only with a high mutation rate to partially recessive deleterious alleles, and that inbreeding purges the population of mutant alleles.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1991        PMID: 1865906     DOI: 10.1038/352522a0

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Nature        ISSN: 0028-0836            Impact factor:   49.962


  62 in total

Review 1.  Recent approaches into the genetic basis of inbreeding depression in plants.

Authors:  David E Carr; Michele R Dudash
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  2003-06-29       Impact factor: 6.237

Review 2.  Population genetics of transposable DNA elements. A Drosophila point of view.

Authors:  C Biémont
Journal:  Genetica       Date:  1992       Impact factor: 1.082

3.  Mating system shifts on the trailing edge.

Authors:  Donald A Levin
Journal:  Ann Bot       Date:  2011-10-06       Impact factor: 4.357

4.  Range expansion of a selfing polyploid plant despite widespread genetic uniformity.

Authors:  Nicole Voss; R Lutz Eckstein; Walter Durka
Journal:  Ann Bot       Date:  2012-06-22       Impact factor: 4.357

5.  Variability of individual genetic load: consequences for the detection of inbreeding depression.

Authors:  Gwendal Restoux; Priscille Huot de Longchamp; Bruno Fady; Etienne K Klein
Journal:  Genetica       Date:  2012-05-26       Impact factor: 1.082

6.  Differences in pollen viability in relation to different deceptive pollination strategies in Mediterranean orchids.

Authors:  Francesca Bellusci; Aldo Musacchio; Rossella Stabile; Giuseppe Pellegrino
Journal:  Ann Bot       Date:  2010-08-17       Impact factor: 4.357

7.  Inbreeding depresses sperm competitiveness, but not fertilization or mating success in male Tribolium castaneum.

Authors:  Lukasz Michalczyk; Oliver Y Martin; Anna L Millard; Brent C Emerson; Matthew J G Gage
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2010-06-16       Impact factor: 5.349

Review 8.  Genetics and biology of primary ciliary dyskinesia.

Authors:  Amjad Horani; Thomas W Ferkol; Susan K Dutcher; Steven L Brody
Journal:  Paediatr Respir Rev       Date:  2015-09-11       Impact factor: 2.726

9.  Epigenetic silencing of transposable elements: a trade-off between reduced transposition and deleterious effects on neighboring gene expression.

Authors:  Jesse D Hollister; Brandon S Gaut
Journal:  Genome Res       Date:  2009-05-28       Impact factor: 9.043

10.  Demographic costs of inbreeding revealed by sex-specific genetic rescue effects.

Authors:  Susanne R K Zajitschek; Felix Zajitschek; Robert C Brooks
Journal:  BMC Evol Biol       Date:  2009-12-10       Impact factor: 3.260

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.