Literature DB >> 21968793

Asymmetric versus symmetric pulses for cortical microstimulation.

Andrew S Koivuniemi1, Kevin J Otto.   

Abstract

Intracortical microstimulation (ICMS), which has shown promise in the visual, auditory and somatosensory systems as a platform for sensory prostheses, typically relies on charged balanced, symmetric, biphasic stimulation. However, neural stimulation models as well as experiments conducted in cochlear implant users have suggested that charge balanced asymmetric pulses could generate lower detection thresholds for stimulation in terms of charge per phase. For this study, rats were chronically implanted with microelectrode arrays unilaterally in their right auditory cortex and then trained to detect ICMS delivered through a single electrode site in order to determine their behavioral threshold. This model was used in two experiments. The first experiment addressed the effect of lead phase direction, asymmetry, and phase duration on detection threshold. The second experiment fixed the cathode phase duration at 123 μs and varied only the phase asymmetry and lead phase direction. Taken together, the results of these experiments suggest that, for ICMS, the primary determinant of threshold level is cathode phase duration, and that asymmetry provides no significant advantage when compared to symmetric, cathode leading pulses. However, symmetric anode leading pulses of less than or equal to 205 μs per phase consistently showed higher thresholds when compared to all other pulses of equal cathode phase duration.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21968793      PMCID: PMC8129588          DOI: 10.1109/TNSRE.2011.2166563

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  IEEE Trans Neural Syst Rehabil Eng        ISSN: 1534-4320            Impact factor:   3.802


  42 in total

1.  Chronic intracortical microstimulation (ICMS) of cat sensory cortex using the Utah Intracortical Electrode Array.

Authors:  P J Rousche; R A Normann
Journal:  IEEE Trans Rehabil Eng       Date:  1999-03

2.  Over-pulsing degrades activated iridium oxide films used for intracortical neural stimulation.

Authors:  Stuart F Cogan; Andrew A Guzelian; William F Agnew; Ted G H Yuen; Douglas B McCreery
Journal:  J Neurosci Methods       Date:  2004-08-30       Impact factor: 2.390

3.  Psychophysics of electrical stimulation of striate cortex in macaques.

Authors:  John R Bartlett; Edgar A DeYoe; Robert W Doty; Barry B Lee; Jeffrey D Lewine; Nubio Negrão; William H Overman
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2005-08-03       Impact factor: 2.714

4.  Feasibility of a visual prosthesis for the blind based on intracortical microstimulation of the visual cortex.

Authors:  E M Schmidt; M J Bak; F T Hambrecht; C V Kufta; D K O'Rourke; P Vallabhanath
Journal:  Brain       Date:  1996-04       Impact factor: 13.501

5.  Electrical stimulation with Pt electrodes: I-a method for determination of "real" electrode areas.

Authors:  S B Brummer; M J Turner
Journal:  IEEE Trans Biomed Eng       Date:  1977-09       Impact factor: 4.538

6.  Organization of auditory cortex in the albino rat: sound frequency.

Authors:  S L Sally; J B Kelly
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  1988-05       Impact factor: 2.714

7.  Excitation of pyramidal tract cells by intracortical microstimulation: effective extent of stimulating current.

Authors:  S D Stoney; W D Thompson; H Asanuma
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  1968-09       Impact factor: 2.714

8.  Neuronal loss due to prolonged controlled-current stimulation with chronically implanted microelectrodes in the cat cerebral cortex.

Authors:  Douglas McCreery; Victor Pikov; Philip R Troyk
Journal:  J Neural Eng       Date:  2010-05-11       Impact factor: 5.379

9.  Behavioral limits of auditory temporal resolution in the rat: amplitude modulation and duration discrimination.

Authors:  Jack B Kelly; James E Cooke; Patrick C Gilbride; Craig Mitchell; Huiming Zhang
Journal:  J Comp Psychol       Date:  2006-05       Impact factor: 2.231

10.  Asymmetric pulses in cochlear implants: effects of pulse shape, polarity, and rate.

Authors:  Olivier Macherey; Astrid van Wieringen; Robert P Carlyon; John M Deeks; Jan Wouters
Journal:  J Assoc Res Otolaryngol       Date:  2006-05-20
View more
  16 in total

1.  In vivo microstimulation with cathodic and anodic asymmetric waveforms modulates spatiotemporal calcium dynamics in cortical neuropil and pyramidal neurons of male mice.

Authors:  Kevin C Stieger; James R Eles; Kip A Ludwig; Takashi D Y Kozai
Journal:  J Neurosci Res       Date:  2020-06-26       Impact factor: 4.164

2.  Restoring the sense of touch with a prosthetic hand through a brain interface.

Authors:  Gregg A Tabot; John F Dammann; Joshua A Berg; Francesco V Tenore; Jessica L Boback; R Jacob Vogelstein; Sliman J Bensmaia
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2013-10-14       Impact factor: 11.205

3.  Comparing temporal aspects of visual, tactile, and microstimulation feedback for motor control.

Authors:  Jason M Godlove; Erin O Whaite; Aaron P Batista
Journal:  J Neural Eng       Date:  2014-07-16       Impact factor: 5.379

4.  Constant RMS versus constant peak modulation for the perceptual equivalence of sinusoidal amplitude modulated signals.

Authors:  Oliver B Regele; Andrew S Koivuniemi; Kevin J Otto
Journal:  Conf Proc IEEE Eng Med Biol Soc       Date:  2013

5.  ERD-based online brain-machine interfaces (BMI) in the context of neurorehabilitation: optimizing BMI learning and performance.

Authors:  Surjo R Soekadar; Matthias Witkowski; Jürgen Mellinger; Ander Ramos; Niels Birbaumer; Leonardo G Cohen
Journal:  IEEE Trans Neural Syst Rehabil Eng       Date:  2011-10       Impact factor: 3.802

6.  The effect of chronic intracortical microstimulation on the electrode-tissue interface.

Authors:  Kevin H Chen; John F Dammann; Jessica L Boback; Francesco V Tenore; Kevin J Otto; Robert A Gaunt; Sliman J Bensmaia
Journal:  J Neural Eng       Date:  2014-02-06       Impact factor: 5.379

7.  Short reaction times in response to multi-electrode intracortical microstimulation may provide a basis for rapid movement-related feedback.

Authors:  Joseph T Sombeck; Lee E Miller
Journal:  J Neural Eng       Date:  2019-12-17       Impact factor: 5.379

8.  A computational model that predicts behavioral sensitivity to intracortical microstimulation.

Authors:  Sungshin Kim; Thierri Callier; Sliman J Bensmaia
Journal:  J Neural Eng       Date:  2016-12-15       Impact factor: 5.379

9.  Voltage-sensitive dye imaging reveals improved topographic activation of cortex in response to manipulation of thalamic microstimulation parameters.

Authors:  Qi Wang; Daniel C Millard; He J V Zheng; Garrett B Stanley
Journal:  J Neural Eng       Date:  2012-02-13       Impact factor: 5.379

10.  The effects of chronic intracortical microstimulation on neural tissue and fine motor behavior.

Authors:  Alexander T Rajan; Jessica L Boback; John F Dammann; Francesco V Tenore; Brock A Wester; Kevin J Otto; Robert A Gaunt; Sliman J Bensmaia
Journal:  J Neural Eng       Date:  2015-10-19       Impact factor: 5.379

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.