Literature DB >> 24110387

Constant RMS versus constant peak modulation for the perceptual equivalence of sinusoidal amplitude modulated signals.

Oliver B Regele, Andrew S Koivuniemi, Kevin J Otto.   

Abstract

Neuroprosthetics using intracortical microstimulation can potentially alleviate sensory deprivation due to injury or disease. However the information bandwidth of a single microstimulation channel remains largely unanswered. This paper presents three experiments that examine the importance of Peak Power/Charge and RMS Power/Charge for detection of acoustic and electrical Sinusoidal Amplitude Modulated stimuli by the auditory system. While the peripheral auditory system is sensitive to RMS power cues for the detection of acoustic stimuli, here we provide results that suggest that the auditory cortex is sensitive to peak charge cues for electrical stimuli. Varying the modulation frequency and depth do not change this effect for detection of modulated electrical stimuli.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 24110387      PMCID: PMC4082400          DOI: 10.1109/EMBC.2013.6610200

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Conf Proc IEEE Eng Med Biol Soc        ISSN: 1557-170X


  22 in total

1.  Sensing without touching: psychophysical performance based on cortical microstimulation.

Authors:  R Romo; A Hernández; A Zainos; C D Brody; L Lemus
Journal:  Neuron       Date:  2000-04       Impact factor: 17.173

2.  Artificial vision for the blind by connecting a television camera to the visual cortex.

Authors:  W H Dobelle
Journal:  ASAIO J       Date:  2000 Jan-Feb       Impact factor: 2.872

3.  An animal model of auditory cortex prostheses.

Authors:  Henning Scheich; Anette Breindl
Journal:  Audiol Neurootol       Date:  2002 May-Jun       Impact factor: 1.854

4.  Extracellular stimulation of central neurons: influence of stimulus waveform and frequency on neuronal output.

Authors:  Cameron C McIntyre; Warren M Grill
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2002-10       Impact factor: 2.714

5.  Chronic neural recording using silicon-substrate microelectrode arrays implanted in cerebral cortex.

Authors:  Rio J Vetter; Justin C Williams; Jamille F Hetke; Elizabeth A Nunamaker; Daryl R Kipke
Journal:  IEEE Trans Biomed Eng       Date:  2004-06       Impact factor: 4.538

6.  The depth, waveform and pulse rate for electrical microstimulation of the auditory cortex.

Authors:  Andrew S Koivuniemi; Kevin J Otto
Journal:  Conf Proc IEEE Eng Med Biol Soc       Date:  2012

7.  Entrainment to video displays in primary visual cortex of macaque and humans.

Authors:  Patrick E Williams; Ferenc Mechler; James Gordon; Robert Shapley; Michael J Hawken
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2004-09-22       Impact factor: 6.167

8.  Single electrode micro-stimulation of rat auditory cortex: an evaluation of behavioral performance.

Authors:  Patrick J Rousche; Kevin J Otto; Mark P Reilly; Daryl R Kipke
Journal:  Hear Res       Date:  2003-05       Impact factor: 3.208

9.  Temporal processing and speech recognition in cochlear implant users.

Authors:  Qian-Jie Fu
Journal:  Neuroreport       Date:  2002-09-16       Impact factor: 1.837

10.  Intracellular responses of neurons in the mouse inferior colliculus to sinusoidal amplitude-modulated tones.

Authors:  H-R Geis; J G G Borst
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2009-02-04       Impact factor: 2.714

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.